I have a few thoughts on the identities of the two beasts of the apocalypse. Enclosed find a paper I wrote a few years back. Please forgive the condition of the text, it is a bit marked up.
Grr. OK, here is the URL in plain text. https://www.scribd.com/document/421495943/The-two-beasts-of-Revelation-Identified
Note that despite my efforts to the contrary this keeps resolving as a link. If the Webmaster objects to this it may not remain up.

Grr. OK, here is the URL in plain text. https://www.scribd.com/document/421495943/The-two-beasts-of-Revelation-Identified
Note that despite my efforts to the contrary this keeps resolving as a link. If the Webmaster objects to this it may not remain up.
I got a question: Can the pope be an antichrist if he claims to believe Jesus came in the flesh and is the son of God?I can tell you this though, garnered from the responses that I have read, the first beast/antichrist and the second beast/false prophet, are yet future and will be working together. When Jesus returns to the earth to end the age, both the beast and the false prophet will be captured and thrown alive into the lake of fire. This, without a doubt, would put these two beasts as being in the same time period.
Regarding what dhchristian said "In a sense we have had that Kingdom of Iron Mixed with clay up to this day" I do not agree with that, because that ten-toed kingdom of partly iron and partly baked clay will be the last kingdom, of which the first beast will rule over. The second beast, which is later referred to as the false prophet, will be the head of the one-world religious system. My bet is that the false prophet will be played by a future pope.
Roman Catholicism believes that every human being should come under the authority of the pope and Roman Catholicism (RC). For many years in times past, those who resisted that counterfeit church were imprisonment, confiscation of property, tortured and being burned at the stake. The popes of old controlled kings and their armies under the threat of excommunication. Since then the popes and its church have desired to get back the power she once had. It is the first beast who will put back into power the seat of the pope and Roman Catholicism as the one-world false religious system, with the pope playing the part of the false prophet.
There are already over 1.2 billion Roman Catholics. What do you think is going to happen when that future pope begins to perform those miracles, signs and wonders, even causing fire to come down out of heaven? The devout will be even more so and will draw all of the false Christian sects to it, coming under the woman who rides the beasts authority, which is Roman Catholicism. She's that great city that ruled over the kings of the earth and who sits on seven hills/mountains. She is that woman clothed in purple and scarlet, which are the exact colors worn by the bishops and cardinals of Roman Catholicism.
And I also agree with and teach the same that Dennis1209 mentioned in his post in that, John was told to write:
What you have seen = Everything written from Rev.1:1 to Rev.1:19
What is now = Represented by the seven letters to the churches and in fact represents the entire church period
What will take place later = everything that takes place after the "what is now," i.e. everything that takes place after the church period
That said, we are currently still in the "what is now" part of what John was told to write. When the Lord comes to gather His church, then the "what will take place later" will begin.
I got a question: Can the pope be an antichrist if he claims to believe Jesus came in the flesh and is the son of God?
Maybe if they lie? I dont know.
I have a few thoughts on the identities of the two beasts of the apocalypse. Enclosed find a paper I wrote a few years back. Please forgive the condition of the text, it is a bit marked up.
I got a question: Can the pope be an antichrist if he claims to believe Jesus came in the flesh and is the son of God?
Maybe if they lie? I dont know.
I have a few thoughts on the identities of the two beasts of the apocalypse. Enclosed find a paper I wrote a few years back. Please forgive the condition of the text, it is a bit marked up.
How can they be one and the same when the Bible says that they are not? You should not be inventing your own theology. The Bible presents an UNHOLY TRINITY as well as the Holy Trinity. And the Unholy Trinity consists of (1) Satan, (2) the Beast the Antichrist, and (3) the False Prophet (Rev 20:10).The 2 beasts, the antichrists and the false prophet are one and the same. . . the father of lies working in the hard heart of unbelief.
I got a question: Can the pope be an antichrist if he claims to believe Jesus came in the flesh and is the son of God?
Maybe if they lie? I dont know.
How can they be one and the same when the Bible says that they are not? You should not be inventing your own theology. The Bible presents an UNHOLY TRINITY as well as the Holy Trinity. And the Unholy Trinity consists of (1) Satan, (2) the Beast the Antichrist, and (3) the False Prophet (Rev 20:10).
And [1] the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where [2] the beast and [3] the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.