Search results

So, where are my free fries?

Jesus often answered questions with questions. Gets you to think and figure it out yourself.

Yes, you don't have to be emotional to serve others and God.

Not anymore

No, the fact that you are *a winner* doesn't change, though your present status does. I am already a winner because I have won multiple times already

This type of thing is fun for me. Unlike others, I love answering, thinking about, and asking my own questions instead of settling for the emotional feel good about it (especially since I don't experience it!). So, for me to explain this, and if you ever want me to explain something else, is fun...

I do not consider my mental conditions as bad things. I am able to stay logical without applying emotional bias to things, but this doesn't mean I don't feel emotions. People say that I "overthink" things as well, or even act like a robot when I was younger! I simply think differently than most...

There is no confusion! Don't worry about that! Now I, myself, when I post this, will have won this game.

Now that's funny!

Great point! I believe that if you post last, but you made a post right before the one you made, you only are winning and here is why: You are still the last to post; that hasn't changed, and those are the requirements to win. Based on your logic, if I make a post now after I made one a year...

I have won, and you all lost because you are not last

I found your thread suggestion humourous.

I don't see any problem with the discussion that we were having about his joke. Well what do you know, I am neurodivergent as well! I have autism and I highly suspect that I have Alexithymia. I am curious about why you do something. I am curious about why you roleplay yourself in third person...

Yes, but it doesn't mean it is wrong that I do emotions differently from you. I don't have to ball my eyes out to God or be irrationally angry at Him. I suppress my emotions without destroying them. Get it?

My motivation was to provide clarity. I analyze everything. I know it was supposed to be seen as a joke. I know he intended it that way. I simply provided clarification on the correct way to say it. Yes, we do all love each other, in Christ. I don't think like everyone else. I am not emotional...

Wasn't intentional if I did.

Did I seem rude?

Ah, but there was! The idiom typically goes something like this, "He has (sometimes the word, "some" is here) beef with me" not, "he has a beef with me". To say the latter phrase is to imply the frustration as a noun/item, though it's not. The first phrase makes more sense.

I know, I simply was correcting your joke.

"They have beef with each other" is correct within the way you are thinking (arguing doesn't necessarily mean anger or having beef with one another depending on definition), not, "they are having a beef?"