Search results

The dilemma lies with those who support him. Those of who didn't, our conscience is clear.

Posting multiple definitions of a phrase in other languages is not a superstition or fallacy. That's quite a stretch.

Or it could be righteous indignation. Many are of us privy to the potential threats of the incoming administration.

If you did, you wouldn't be asking such pejorative questions.

First Trump's victory wasn't all that massive. Many men always imagine things being bigger than they really are to puff up their ego. Robert deNiro is not only an acting legend, but he obviously can see through the hypocrisy and propaganda of a celebrity that has no business being in politics...

So they are responsible for Trump's bad character and wrongdoings?

What does Biden, Harris or the Democrats have to with who Trump is as a person?

You can look at my posts in the thread, "Could Trump do anything to make you stop supporting him?"

Supporting and believing someone like Trump is not what the Bible meant by having a "servant's heart". https://www.biblestudytools.com/topical-verses/bible-verses-about-the-servants-heart/

Francis Collins seems to be a bit more credible than someone like Ken Ham.

There are a few scientists who are also Christian(i.e. Francis Collins head of the Human Genome Project), that acknowledge the overwhelming evidence for the Theory of Evolution. Acknowledging such a theory is not blasphemy or anti-God.

I g Freemasonry has been in my family for several generations. One of my great grandfathers who was a minister and a Freemason performed a ceremony for an interracial marriage. It was at a time and in a state where it deemed illegal and he was arrested. When he eventually revealed that he was a...

If Trump is anointed, then rhinos must be able to fly.

So facts can be considered an irrational argument?

If the shoe fits....

Trump made plenty of empty promises for his devotees. Yet they still follow him?

And what's the reason for the kink or BDSM reference in regards to the orange fuhrer? That's pretty obscene.

Trump couldn't make Mexico pay for his wall, replace Obamacare or thwart a pandemic. He's gonna keep crashing like Super Dave Osborne again and again.

If you can't keep up, I can't help you there.

So what many of you are saying is that even though Trump will not fulfill most of his promises and not benefit the U.S. economy, that's better than having Kamala Harris as a president? Okay then. :sneaky: