Search results

Do you believe that a person comes to believe in God because the power of the evidences persuade their intellect, or do you believe God's existence is self-evidently true and that unbelievers are suppressing this truth?

Well said

I don't understand why you think that's bad form, but to each their own.

how so?

Do you believe God's existence is self-evidently true? Or do you believe that you have to use evidence and reason to demonstrate God's existence?

What's your approach and why? Evidential or presuppositional apologetics? I lean towards presuppositional, but use evidences as a spotlight on their pre-existing presuppositions they are holding to. Thanks!