Search results

Feelings are irrelevant in a discussion about facts. While Post's comments may be considered "ad hominem", his argument is not. He is not saying you are wrong because you are an idiot; that would be an ad hominem argument. Post has requested repeatedly that you provide an explanation for the...

Trying to explain the dual nature of Christ with pagan terminology is bound to fail. It's a category error.

Fixed it for you. You are assuming, on the basis of different interpretation of Scripture, that those who disagree with you are "under the sway of the wicked one". Using your logic, we are completely justified in believing that you are "under the sway of the wicked one". Neither references...

Scripture does not actually say that. In principle, Scripture disagrees with you in the person of Jesus Christ, Who is both fully flesh and fully spirit. ;)

Your argument is entirely based on the assumption that your interpretation of Scripture is the correct one. It's not going to convince me. Calling me a denier of Scripture is not going to win you any points. There isn't even a single verse of relevant Scripture with which I disagree; However, I...

So, if you have your answer from Scripture, why are you asking strangers on this forum?

While I don't disagree with you necessarily, your assertion in the previous post is not supported by either of those passages.

What do people claim? What does Scripture tell you?

The problem here is your insistence that your interpretation is the only correct one. It isn't. Deal with it.

Then don't insult me by calling my views "Unbelief 101". You and I interpret certain passages of Scripture differently. Leave it at that. Right, so stick to the topic, not insults toward those who disagree with your position.

You are new here. I would suggest that you avoid making hasty assumptions about others on the basis of one or two posts.

I will caution you once: expressing your opinion about my faith in Christ is out of line. You can either retract and apologize, or I will consider that to be the way you prefer ME to treat YOU.

Your comments are irrelevant. The truth is that women, in general, are no more sinful than men.

Your comments are overtly misogynistic and completely inconsistent with sound biblical exegesis.

No less than men are.

People rightly reject your misinterpretations of God's word about His creation.

Hey! Sup?

Interesting idea. Where is it in Scripture?

You're avoiding... because you know that you can't make a case "from nature".

You're on the right track but have not traveled far enough. Keep going.