Search results

No I'm staying demonstrably true facts that were brought out in court. There is video footage of Mr Jones framing, slandering and harassing grieving parents who just lost their children. He can burn in hell for all I care

No. This is a lie. What happened was as I already mentioned, he thought he was above the law and thought he could ignore the discovery process of the trial so the judge found him and content and issued a default judgment for the plaintiffs Alex Jones is an evil despicable human being and he...

Yeah except for the part where video evidence was played in court showing Mr Jones defaming the victims of the Sandy Hook shootings

You're just talking about political mudslinging. That's not the same thing. And the defamation case you have to actually prove damages Which is what happened in the Alex Jones case

The shooting victims and their families, he accused them of being crisis actors Due to these allegations, they were threatened and harassed by Alex Jones's insane followers That's where the proof of damages comes in

If a politician were to deliberately defame someone then I imagine he would be subject to being sued also

No. Defamation is a criminal offense not covered under the first amendment. So if you deliberately tell lies on people and these lies you deliberately tell cause them damages like getting harassed in death threats then you will be held accountable in a court of law. James I remember there's a...

If you are found guilty of defamation in a court of law, the first amendment is irrelevant Same reason things like death threats are not covered under the first amendment

.....

I think you need to take off the tin foil hat and come back to reality

Are you following the Alex Jones hearing? He's already been found liable he chose to ignore the discovery process and turn over any pertinent information Turns out judges don't like it when you ignore a court order so she issued a default judgment for the plaintiffs Also the judge keeps having...

By your own admission you know nothing about it and that's why you think science is satanic. Argument from ignorance fallacy

I know he has me on ignore but someone inform him that I haven't talked down to a single person throughout this entire conversation. I'm trying to have a conversation about science and one guy went on a long rant about transgender people which had precisely doo doo to do with the topic. Also I'm...

I'm not

Troll harder

You entirely missed the point

No.. in the scientific method, a theory must be backed up by observable evidence before it's even called a theory

The "you should have used that money to feed people" argument doesn't fly and here's why. How much of my expendable income am morally obligated to give to charity. When I go to the gas station and buy a bag of potato chips that I really didn't need, am I guilty because I didn't give that $2 to...

Okay then don't do it. It's your body and your choice just like other people have the choice to do what they want with their own bodies

. I came across this video and it kind of makes my brain explode The character is having a conversation with an AI that he built himself and they get into some pretty interesting philosophical stuff