Search results

Lol not even remotely close. Again the Athanasian Creed perfectly describes both the trinity doctrine and the Christian faith, denial of any point of the Athanasian Creed means you don't actually have the Christian faith which you will definitely never be saved. You is used here in impersonal...

Lol whether implicit or explicit, indeed, if one is not a Christian they will definitely perish in the eternal hellfire. Denial of the trinity doctrine is denial of being a Christian and so implicitly the only outcome guaranteed to them is hellfire everlasting. Since the Athanasian Creed...

Where did you post that? Also mindful trying not to stray too far from the trinity doctrine aspect since that is the topic and question of the OP. Apologies to the OP for digressions derived from replies.

Denial of any part of the Athanasian Creed means denial of Christianity and puts one outside of the Christian faith, which faith is the only means to attain salvation. Therefore denial of any contents of the Athanasian Creed will certainly result in eternal damnation guaranteed.

Well the problem you will run into very quickly is that the Athanasian Creed is a complete summary of the scriptures and the Christian faith, so denial of any part of the contents of the Athanasian Creed is definitely going to get one sent to hellfire everlasting.

What makes the Athanasian Creed very special is really if you think about it it is really just a combination of the Apostle's Creed and the Nicene Creed. Though the Nicene Creed is indeed good also for expressing the trinity doctrine, I find that the Athanasian Creed is a little bit more...

No I will not agree to that. Anyone that has read the Bible in fullness and believes what is written is going to find that it is pretty obvious that the Athanasian Creed accurately describes Christianity, and topically, the trinity doctrine and why the trinity doctrine is the true theology of...

Deuteronomy 28:43-52

Should I become a catholic because I refuse to worship my own ego and be cursed with God's ultimate curse to let the alien that destroyed their own home to come and also destroy my home and lay my brothers and my sisters lower than dirt? For a certainty the foolish of the nations for the worship...

Isaiah 5:20-30

Well yea that would work, though really the whole chapter is more applicable since taking the entirety of the chapter gives you the divinity of Jesus as expressed in John 1:1, the eternity of Jesus as in verse 2, the incarnation of Jesus as in verse 14, the display of the persons of the trinity...

Lol why should I be a catholic and fear a nuclear war? Psalm 2 praise Jesus.

Non nobis domine. Psalm 115 praise Jesus.

Lol literally in the post you quote I cite John 1. Pretty confident that John 1 is scripture and is also the primary backbone of the trinity doctrine. If you just want further scriptures, well sure there are very many. The baptism account of Jesus as found in Matthew 3:16-17 destroys the...

Well that's where you're wrong, literally millions of people throughout history understood the trinity and so do I. I have already explained to you through my own words, the scriptures, and the holy doctrines. God is not an occult God, I'd be very wary of any group that tries to manipulate you...

If it be that they are really a Christian then they should marry a Christian man, obey him, beget Christian sons, and fight for their own country and their own people to rid it of Islam and their sick sulture and ideologies that brought them to ruin i nthe first place. it is not right to seek...

Sure. Think they're a female not a male. The Christian thing is not to allow an invasion of aliens that harm your own people just to pretend like you are virtuous to slake your own ego. The results of allowing the invasion of aliens for the sake of the disingenuous ego are already manifest...

I think it is a sister. Also yes, you don't harm your own people and facilitate an invasion to virtue-signal to your ego. The results of that have born themselves out.

No I have pretty thoroughly explained it twice in my own words in posts #35 and especially #38. Post #41 then is if you want it explained in other peoples' words as well as a brief history of the doctrine.

No, I already did, in fact I did it twice. You not liking what I said doesn't mean I didn't say it lol.