Search results

  1. I

    Nature of man --- a different biblical perspective worth considering ( part 1)

    "Infinite_Ark, posted "]Why would God create man to fall? Did God create man to fall? Not my belief.
  2. I

    Nature of man --- a different biblical perspective worth considering ( part 1)

    From the scripture, we come to know 1. the original sin-- which Adam committed that brought death to the world , from Adam to Moses (Romans 5:14) 2. actual sin --- which makes us individually or personally accountable for our deeds. (Ezekiel 18:20; The soul that sins shall die. The...
  3. I

    Nature of man --- a different biblical perspective worth considering ( part 1)

    I am signing off. ' will comment on this post and the rest when next I sign in. Thanks for chatting.
  4. I

    Nature of man --- a different biblical perspective worth considering ( part 1)

    What you call giving a body of dust, I call the separation of the male and female qualities (as explained in my op) which created a void in man. The first man Adam became a living soul (my op says so too) whose life depends on the life giving spirit, the word of God and subject to freedom...
  5. I

    Nature of man --- a different biblical perspective worth considering ( part 1)

    The first man Adam sinned and in turn planted the sinful seed in the human race who continued to nurture and grow this seed that yields the fruits of ungodliness and death. Jesus came, uprooted the sinful seed and planted the seed of righteousness in mankind. In the same way we have nurtured...
  6. I

    Nature of man --- a different biblical perspective worth considering ( part 1)

    I forgot to mention that I did not discuss about the makeup of the soul in my op otherwise, the aspect of the body would have been mentioned. How can we live on earth without earthly body? Man was not made that way as the scripture makes us understand.
  7. I

    Nature of man --- a different biblical perspective worth considering ( part 1)

    I saw where you quoted Gnosticism in one of my posts. You seem to be applying your understanding of their belief system to my op. if what they believe is what you have noted here, then, my belief is different and theirs is not compatible with what I have written in my op.
  8. I

    Nature of man --- a different biblical perspective worth considering ( part 1)

    "ForestGreenCook, posted Doesn't the scriptures say that Jesus was the only man without sin? Yes, the scriptures say so and I believe it. The first man Adam sinned and "planted" the seed of sin in human race. Ever since all have sinned and come short of the glory of God as it is...
  9. I

    Nature of man --- a different biblical perspective worth considering ( part 1)

    "posthuman, posted i hope it's clear that i agree man is not merely dust but a soul, quickened by the breath of the spirit of life. an hallmark of classical gnosticism is the teaching that the body is either (1) of no consequence or (2) evil or (3) some combination of bad & irrelevant. so...
  10. I

    Nature of man --- a different biblical perspective worth considering ( part 1)

    "Magenta, posted Are you saying Adam was incapable of sinning? Sin entered the world through one man: Adam. The Adam that was wholly Spirit - driven is incapable of sinning. If you notice in the garden of Eden, before Eve was made, Adam had a perfect relationship with God. Sin entered when...
  11. I

    Nature of man --- a different biblical perspective worth considering ( part 1)

    posthuman, posted God disagrees with you on this point. see Romans 8. we, and all of creation, eagerly await the final redemption of our bodies. Christ was bodily resurrected. we are bipartite beings, a soul inhabiting a body. though God defines personhood, existence, life & death not in terms...
  12. I

    Nature of man --- a different biblical perspective worth considering ( part 1)

    Adam remains the first man if you read my post well. The op did not say Adam is not the first man in creation.
  13. I

    Nature of man --- a different biblical perspective worth considering ( part 1)

    "infinitekhanol, posted The issue of feminism does not arise here. I did not say in my op that God is not our father. In fact, the Fatherhood of God is not in question, for it runs through the scripture and is quite understandable. The God Almighty is our maker, the creator of all that...
  14. I

    Nature of man --- a different biblical perspective worth considering ( part 1)

    "Nehemiah6, posted This is PATENTLY FALSE. All references to the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are in the MASCULINE gender. The Feminists hate this, but Christians do not. The issue of feminism does not arise here. I did not say in my op that God is not our father. In fact, the...
  15. I

    Nature of man --- a different biblical perspective worth considering ( part 1)

    "lenna, posted: ok well agenda time again goes like this: all you Christians are wrong. I was born already a real Christian and I know God in a way you do not, so I am here to help you all out. drop your Bibles and listen to me instead nope You seem to enjoy making false assumptions...
  16. I

    Nature of man --- a different biblical perspective worth considering ( part 1)

    you came here to do what exactly? you are the some people. you are not being honest and by the way, God is not a spirit God is Spirit. God is male Oh thanks. You are right. God is not a Spirit God is Spirit. as it is written. Typo error. But He remains neither male nor female. The...