5 no-brainers…agree? disagree?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Groovy,
As by now you should know that my fundamental critique of your original post is that it attempts to use a spoonful of scripture to address a mountain of reality. Making eternal life and death declarations based on a few Googled topics is inadequate and misleading. The very nature of God as revealed in the entire corpus of scripture can not and should not be passed off in a couple of lifted bible verses that just happen to prove what you already to be "true" is "true." By declaring who will be and won't be saved using the same snippeture means you are attempting to speak for God where God has remained silent or mining a few rocks from a mountain of data. I attempted to demonstrate that anyone can extract their preferred regality using the same Google me approach. Thus I pointed you to the entire of chapter of Matthew 25 where Jesus is providing an ironclad description of who will be saved and your claims for who will and won't be saved entirely ignored Jesus's specific and detailed description of judgement for all. Jesus reminds us that our primary mission in life is to love God and to love our fellow man as we love ourselves.

Jesus made it clear, there are two crosses for Jesus followers. On one Christ was sacrificed for our sins on the other we are called to take up our cross daily and live sacrificial lives of our own. I don't see that reality in your original post. Jesus also defined another criteria for his true followers. They are those who love one another. They belong to a loving community that all the world can see. Too often the least loving communities in our local communities are the competing, slandering, self-righteous and isolated "Christian churches." If you brought all the "Christians in a town or city together the result would be finger pointing, condemning and defensive posturing.
The number of self identified Christians in our country has dropped from 78% to about 62% just since 2007. People are walking away from a Christianity of rules, creeds, social conventions and politics that describe 21st Century Christianity for millions of people. Over 7,000 ( by some estimates 15,000 Christian churches closed in 2025 alone) Christian churches permanently close their doors in America each year or two. While we rail on and sell our unique "plan of salvation" among the 200-2,000 different denominations. We now sell Christianity cheap. Just nod you head to a 60 second pulpit prayer and heaven is now a guarantee. Did Jesus come, suffer and die to provide heaven for the mear cost of 60 seconds of your life? We have partial phd's in our denominations unique creeds and salvation plans but very few skinned knees for praying with the sick, very few empty pantries from feeding the hungry and nobody prays with those in prison...because they got what they deserve. Has the church panned off to the government all the care and family support the followers of Christ are called by Him to do? Do you know the widows in your congregation? Adoption rates for abandoned children by Christian families is no higher than for "unbelievers." Sad.

Do we live behind a wall of scripture quotations in hopes that our brand of Christianity will survive? Are we know for our "expertise" in understanding the bible or for being America's Good Samaritans. The truth is a people will not believe what we say until they see that we reflect the very nature of the One we claim to worship. By endlessly "perfecting" our theology without actually being born again from self-serving, ego drive, self-righteousness to a life changed by the power of the Holy Spirit into loving servants walking in the image of Christ we should turn our biblical study into changed lives instead of purity of "orthodoxy." If your expertise in the bible does not lead you to understand that to serve God, we must serve those he loves, then we may have missed the entire gospel.

As to the use of the "Bible." The Bible Christians used for the 1st 1,500 years is not the one in the hands of the vast majority of Christians today. The books included in the Bible of Protestants today is not the Bible of the last 1,700 years. There are approximately 900+ complete or partial English translations and in the last 26 years there are 100 new translations. The textural variance in the current library of bible translations are important and significant. Each version requires a relook at our "basic" understanding of key theological concepts. Thus when you post scripture snippets you do so not understanding how they may read differently based on what Bible translation one uses to view your references.

I am always happy to discuss the "bible" but it is never without the priority that I must use it to find continuous rebirth, recommitment to God's mission of love and mercy and to realize that being "right" is not the highest objective of the Christian life.
 
"Not the Bible"?
The Bible is how we know Jesus.
Unless someone is claiming esoteric knowledge.

I was responding to #4 of the OP.
4. The Bible, as wonderful as it is, is not enough. It talks of baptism, and partaking of bread and water and the Bible alone can not do that (Acts 2:41-42, John 6:54 KJV).

Without Jesus, the Bible is just a thick book with a lot of stuff no one will ever live out.

I had the Bible before I got saved and it did not bring me any closer to God. It was only when I wanted to get to know Jesus that it started to make sense because He was guiding me through it. Big difference.

So no, it's not the Bible - it's Jesus!


🕊
 
Groovy,
As by now you should know that my fundamental critique of your original post is that it attempts to use a spoonful of scripture to address a mountain of reality. Making eternal life and death declarations based on a few Googled topics is inadequate and misleading. The very nature of God as revealed in the entire corpus of scripture can not and should not be passed off in a couple of lifted bible verses that just happen to prove what you already to be "true" is "true." ...
Jesus made it clear, there are two crosses for Jesus followers. On one Christ was sacrificed for our sins on the other we are called to take up our cross daily and live sacrificial lives of our own. I don't see that reality in your original post. Jesus also defined another criteria for his true followers. They are those who love one another. They belong to a loving community that all the world can see. Too often the least loving communities in our local communities are the competing, slandering, self-righteous and isolated "Christian churches." If you brought all the "Christians in a town or city together the result would be finger pointing, condemning and defensive posturing.
.....

We have partial phd's in our denominations unique creeds and salvation plans but very few skinned knees for praying with the sick, very few empty pantries from feeding the hungry and nobody prays with those in prison...because they got what they deserve. Has the church panned off to the government all the care and family support the followers of Christ are called by Him to do? Do you know the widows in your congregation? Adoption rates for abandoned children by Christian families is no higher than for "unbelievers." Sad.

Do we live behind a wall of scripture quotations in hopes that our brand of Christianity will survive? ....

As to the use of the "Bible." The Bible Christians used for the 1st 1,500 years is not the one in the hands of the vast majority of Christians today. The books included in the Bible of Protestants today is not the Bible of the last 1,700 years. There are approximately 900+ complete or partial English translations and in the last 26 years there are 100 new translations. The textural variance in the current library of bible translations are important and significant. Each version requires a relook at our "basic" understanding of key theological concepts. Thus when you post scripture snippets you do so not understanding how they may read differently based on what Bible translation one uses to view your references.

I am always happy to discuss the "bible" but it is never without the priority that I must use it to find continuous rebirth, recommitment to God's mission of love and mercy and to realize that being "right" is not the highest objective of the Christian life.

What we have here is a failure to communicate. Again I will number the points.

1. You said "As by now you should know that my fundamental critique of your original post is that it attempts to use a spoonful of scripture to address a mountain of reality."

I already said that if you have an ocean of GW you want to share, go ahead, so please go ahead instead of changing the metaphor to spoonfuls.

2. You - Making eternal life and death declarations based on a few Googled topics is inadequate and misleading.

Me - What googling are you referencing?

3. You - The very nature of God as revealed in the entire corpus of scripture can not and should not be passed off in a couple of lifted bible verses that just happen to prove what you already to be "true" is "true."

Me - Okay, so share what you belief is true about God using hundreds of verses if that floats your boat.

4. You - By declaring who will be and won't be saved using the same snippeture means you are attempting to speak for God where God has remained silent or mining a few rocks from a mountain of data.

Me - Would you prefer I speak for Satan? Who do YOU speak for?

5. You - I attempted to demonstrate that anyone can extract their preferred regality using the same Google me approach. Thus I pointed you to the entire of chapter of Matthew 25 where Jesus is providing an ironclad description of who will be saved and your claims for who will and won't be saved entirely ignored Jesus's specific and detailed description of judgement for all. Jesus reminds us that our primary mission in life is to love God and to love our fellow man as we love ourselves.

Me - Again, how does what I believe contradict what Jesus said in Matthew 25? How does your insight differ?

6. You - Jesus made it clear, there are two crosses for Jesus followers. On one Christ was sacrificed for our sins on the other we are called to take up our cross daily and live sacrificial lives of our own. I don't see that reality in your original post.

Me - I did not want to dump the whole load on you all at once, but if you insist, here is the rest:

  1. There is a/one all-loving and just Lord or Creator God (Deut. 6:4, John 3:16, 2Thes. 1:6), who loves sinful humanity (Rom. 5:6-8, John 3:16) and who is both able (2Tim. 1:12) and willing (1Tim. 2:3-4, Ezek. 33:11) to provide all morally accountable human beings salvation or heaven—a wonderful life full of love, joy and peace forever.
  2. Human beings are selfish or sinful (Rom. 3:23, 2Tim. 3:2-4, Col. 3:5), miserable (Gal. 5:19-21), and hopeless (Eph. 2:12) or hell-bound at the judgment (Matt. 23:33 & 25:46) when they reject God’s salvation (John 3:18, Rom. 2:5-11).
  3. Jesus is God’s Messiah/Christ and incarnate Son, the way that God has chosen (John 3:16, Acts 16:30-31, Phil. 2:9-11) of providing salvation by means of his atoning death on the cross for the payment of the penalty for the sins of humanity (Rom. 3:22-25 & 5:9-11), followed by his resurrection to reign in heaven (1Cor. 15:14-28).
  4. Thus, every person who hears the NT Gospel needs to repent and accept God’s grace or justification in Jesus as Christ/Messiah the Lord or Supreme Commander (Luke 2:11, John 14:6, Acts 16:31), at which moment God’s loving Holy Spirit of Christ indwells/baptizes the believer into the church (Rev. 3:20, Rom. 5:5, 1Cor. 12:13).
  5. Loving Christ Jesus as Lord (Luke 2:11), God the Son (Matt. 16:16) or God in the human dimension (Col. 2:9) means reflecting divine love (DL) as empowered by the Holy Spirit, thereby obeying His command to love one another (Matt. 7:21, 22:37-40, John 13:35, Rom. 13:9)—forever (Matt. 10:22, Psa. 113:2), which will eventually achieve spiritual maturity on earth and heaven after Christ returns at God’s resurrection (John 14:6, 17&26, Rom. 8:6-17, Gal. 6:7-9, Eph. 1:13-14, Phil. 3:12-16, Heb. 10:36, 12:1, Jam. 1:2-4).
7. You - Jesus also defined another criteria for his true followers. They are those who love one another. They belong to a loving community that all the world can see... Has the church panned off to the government all the care and family support the followers of Christ are called by Him to do? Do you know the widows in your congregation?
Me - Not all.

8. You - Do we live behind a wall of scripture quotations in hopes that our brand of Christianity will survive? Are we known for our "expertise" in understanding the bible or for being America's Good Samaritans. The truth is a people will not believe what we say until they see that we reflect the very nature of the One we claim to worship... we may have missed the entire gospel.

Me - True, we should practice what we preach. This is addressed in my point #5.

9. You - As to the use of the "Bible." The Bible Christians used for the 1st 1,500 years is not the one in the hands of the vast majority of Christians today. The books included in the Bible of Protestants today is not the Bible of the last 1,700 years. There are approximately 900+ complete or partial English translations and in the last 26 years there are 100 new translations. The textural variance in the current library of bible translations are important and significant. Each version requires a relook at our "basic" understanding of key theological concepts. Thus when you post scripture snippets you do so not understanding how they may read differently based on what Bible translation one uses to view your references.

Me - So feel free to share what snippets you think need to be posted.

10. You - I am always happy to discuss the "bible" but it is never without the priority that I must use it to find continuous rebirth, recommitment to God's mission of love and mercy and to realize that being "right" is not the highest objective of the Christian life.

Me - Ditto. A major reason many Christians throughout history have not manifested the love and unity of God’s Spirit (Eph. 4:3) as well as they should is because of failure to realize this truth. If they did, it would free them to speak honestly and fellowship without becoming unduly upset about relatively minor issues. They would receive God’s blessing as peacemakers, who draw inclusive circles around people based on the kerygma rather than denominational lines between them due to didachaic differences. Jesus prayed for spiritual unity (cf. John 17:20-23, “May they be one…”). Thus, unity regarding the Gospel is more important than accuracy regarding doctrinal details.

11. I see two remaining points that you have not addressed:

a. Do you want to go first in answering the question about the fate of those who could not and did not ever hear of Jesus?

b. Before answering your question, "Is walking away from "christianity" one definition of "rejecting salvation?", I need to understand what you intend to imply by putting those words in quotation marks.

Over...
 
I was responding to #4 of the OP.


Without Jesus, the Bible is just a thick book with a lot of stuff no one will ever live out.

I had the Bible before I got saved and it did not bring me any closer to God. It was only when I wanted to get to know Jesus that it started to make sense because He was guiding me through it. Big difference.

So no, it's not the Bible - it's Jesus!


🕊
great true answer
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndTimeIsTheCharm