The Bible never mentions TWO Gospels only ONE by which, if we believe, ANYONE can be saved. It does not even use the PLURAL form of gospel which it would if there were some another way to be saved for the Jews or Gentiles. Instead, Jesus commanded His disciples:
The fallacy in what you're saying here is revealed nicely in what Paul said about his gospel that he preached, which was NOT the same gospel as that of the eleven:
Ephesians 3:1-7
1 For this cause
I Paul, the prisoner of Jesus Christ
for you Gentiles,
2 If ye have heard of the
dispensation of the grace of God which is
given me to you-ward:
3 How that
by revelation he made known unto me the mystery; (as I wrote afore in few words,
4 Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand
my knowledge in the mystery of Christ)
5 Which
in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as
it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit;
6
That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel:
7 Whereof
I was made a minister, according to the gift of the grace of God given unto me by the effectual working of his power.
Where did the eleven ever preach that Gentiles were fellow heirs? When did even Jesus make such a declaration? Jesus called you Gentiles "dogs." Doesn't that offend you Gentiles? It shouldn't because the gospel Jesus preached and that He taught the twelve to preach was not the same as that which was preached by Paul.
So, given that what was given to Paul was not known until revealed to Paul by the Lord after Acts 9, the belief in some hard fast rule for plural mention, or some other specific and absolute declaration, that makes no sense. Who can say the Lord SHOULD have done this or that if something He revealed through a lengthy set of books and chapters that are only gleaned through study, contrast and comparison? Did not Paul say to STUDY to show thyself approved? The word of God is filled with knowledge that must be dredged up through study and prayer that Holy Spirit may reveal to the follower of His word the many, many things not spelled out like a silver platter falling from the sky into one's lap.
So, if I may, what are you saying?
I hope you will agree with me that the phrase "every creature" is
all inclusive and, as such necessarily includes BOTH Jews AND Gentiles. Jesus said 6
Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they will be filled (Matthew 5:6)
The desire to be cleansed and walk with God is universal. The promise of eternal life is not distributed by race. it is for those who hunger and, while it is not possible for us to be righteous while we are devoid of the, Holy Spirit it is possible for us to be needy and admit it to God.[/QUOTE]
Jesus was talking to the Jewish eleven, not to Gentiles, and I as a Jew who studies the Greek and Hebrew of scripture and am well acquainted with the historic analogies of Jewish language and culture of those times, Jesus was not telling them to go to anyone but Israel...ALL of Israel, including those scattered abroad. That is the nuance of "every creature." He was NOT telling them to go unto the Gentiles as well, given that He forbade the disciples to go unto Gentiles and even to the Samaritans.
Doing so was reserved for Paul and those whom he appointed as apostles as fellow workers. To disagree with that is to cut out from one's Bible this and quite a number of other relevant verses:
Romans 11:13 For I speak to
you Gentiles, inasmuch as
I am the apostle of the Gentiles,
I magnify mine office:
Paul did not at all include the eleven in this office with his specific singular that limits one's attention to him alone...given that you seem to pay particular attention to plural versus singular in the text.
If he were preaching what the eleven were preaching, then Paul was a liar for anyone to claim he was preaching the same gospel as the eleven:
Galatians 1:11-12
11 But I certify you, brethren, that
the gospel which was preached of me is not after man.
12 For
I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.
Paul knew what the eleven were preaching, for he persecuted all the Messianic Jews who converted to the gospel taught by the eleven. He clearly stated that his gospel was not taught to him by any man, but by the Lord only. Church tradition teaches otherwise, which renders all those churches that teach the usual trash that defies this and many other written scripture, they are not of Christ, but rather instruments of the devil for deception.
[/QUOTE]Paul also said: 16
I am not ashamed of THE
gospel, (SINGULAR)
because it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, first to the Jew, then to the Greek. 17For
the gospel reveals the
righteousness of God that comes by faith from start to finish, just as it is written: “The righteous will live by faith.”…(Romans 1:16)
Is Paul insinuating that there is ANOTHER gospel for
Jews which can also make righteous and save but which adds OTHER requirements. Some must have been confused about that but Paul made sure everyone knew that "the righteousness that comes from God comes by faith FROM
START TO FINISH. No, again, from start to finish is another all-inclusive statement. From " does not leave out ANYTHING.
Did Jesus sacrifice Himself on two occasions - once for Jews and another time for Gentiles. How could He by his death make the TWO into one whole body if He did that? There is ONE gospel that us THE power of GOD unto EVERYONE WHO BELIEVES
You should quit listening to the Hyperdispensationist-Bullengerites whose message divides the Body of Christ in two and relegates even the words of Christ to some other mini-dispensation.[/QUOTE]
Trying to force upon a specific text that addresses a particular message in its surroundings at that specific time, and therefore singular, and trying to stretch that out across all of scripture, that's not at all a well rounded practice that any legitimate scholar of scripture would ever foist upon anyone. That is the antics of Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses and other cultic groupings out there seeking to mislead their followers and audience of potential proselytes. We as followers of Christ should stand head and shoulders above such. I'm not saying that you're trying to intentionally mislead anyone, but the lack of care in how you present methods for interpretation such as this, its reckless and unsound.
I hope this speaks to you from the word of God, and excites you with the understanding that there's some things you've missed in all this. It excited me by removing blinders from my eyes, put there by a blind indifference on my part for casting aside what "pastors" had taught me for years without my turning a more critical eye to the scriptures in order to see that so many of them were false teachers.
Also, we are ALL dispensationalists. When we sin, I dare say that none of us runs out and starts offering up burnt sacrifices for our sins. Dispensations are clearly addressed, literally, within scripture, and so yammering in the negative about that concept only lessens the weight of one's words.
Blessings to you and yours.
MM