Loss of salvation???

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Musicmaster

Well-known member
Feb 8, 2021
1,600
334
83
To be honest, there is still a dilemma.

I believe salvation has always been the same. And only one way........ Faith alone in Christ alone.

It was in the "shadows and types" with Israel. And Paul brought it into the LIGHT for all to see.
Ok, let's look directly at the teaching of Peter, paying close attention to the wording, and the dilemma should disappear:

Acts 2:37-38
37 Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men and brethren, what shall we do?
38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

Now, we today know...or at least, many of us know...that we don't have to do any work to be saved nor to receive Holy Spirit. If any work were involved, then it is no more of grace, but of works, just as Paul argued.

So, can we agree that the remission of sins for Israel was a critical element for them to be saved? They could not possibly be saved if their sins were still upon them. I'm sure we can agree with that.

Is it because Israel was under a different set of requirements for salvation that bothers your train of thought about all this? Israel had a special purpose in God's plans. They alone were the kings and priests unto the Most High God, not Gentiles. They were under the Law, Gentiles were not...except the proselytes into Judaism who became Jews and were therefore beholden to follow the Law of Moses.

Gentiles, however, after the "wall of partition" was taken down when Israel fell, were blessed greatly when salvation came unto them directly without their having to convert to Judaism.

Some out there are bound to have a brain aneurism when reading things that go against their adoption of replacement theology corruptions that are so prolific throughout Evangelical teachings and beliefs. The followers of that garbage may as well join with Obama, Michael and their affiliations with the Muslim Brotherhood with that kind of thinking, for they are all kindred spirits in this regard.

If there's still problems with what's actually written in the scriptures, then please do share so that we can all consider it compared to what's written.

Ephesians 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:

Baptism is of ourselves, for one has to prepare and then walk down into the water and then walk out of the water. What does that water do besides getting one wet? Nothing. Nothing at all for we who are under grace.

MM
 

Musicmaster

Well-known member
Feb 8, 2021
1,600
334
83
Loves them enough for what? To tease them with something He knew they'd reject. Sorry man this makes no sense at all on ANY level. This would make God unsure, inept, weak, pointless, and a liar. This brings us to the fact His word completely contradicts that Jesus loses ANY the Father gives Him. Doesn't it?
I realize it's likely a useless exercise toward some for me to quote scripture that speaks contrary to popular beliefs, but it needs to be shown from scripture, and those willing to accept it, then great. Those who won't, oh well:

Matthew 10:5-7
5 These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not:
6 But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
7 And as ye go, preach, saying, The kingdom of heaven is at hand.

Who are some of the lost sheep to whom the twelve were assigned to preach? It wasn't to Gentiles, but to Jews, and here's just a small listing of the Jews from many different (Greek - ethnos):

Acts 2:9-11
9 Parthians, and Medes, and Elamites, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia, and in Judaea, and Cappadocia, in Pontus, and Asia,
10 Phrygia, and Pamphylia, in Egypt, and in the parts of Libya about Cyrene, and strangers of Rome, Jews and proselytes,
11 Cretes and Arabians, we do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works of God.

Paul stated with very clear language that he was the apostle to the Gentiles, with the twelve being the apostles to the "circumcized."

Like I said, some people are going to stick with that they have always believed and been taught by their false teaching pastors and Sunday school teachers and parents and grandparents or whomever they heard it from. Heck, even the homosexual friendly NIV may teach the same thing. For many, it doesn't matter what the scriptures actually say in the Greek, it's all about what one believes and to boot with the truth.

How about you, Jim? Do you believe what scripture says? I hope you're a man of the Word rather than one unwilling to explore and study it all out for what it says in the place of all the allegory trash out there that is used to make scripture say what others want it to say.

Blessings.

MM
 

Kroogz

Well-known member
Dec 5, 2023
1,780
866
113
Ok, let's look directly at the teaching of Peter, paying close attention to the wording, and the dilemma should disappear:

Acts 2:37-38
37 Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men and brethren, what shall we do?
38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

Now, we today know...or at least, many of us know...that we don't have to do any work to be saved nor to receive Holy Spirit. If any work were involved, then it is no more of grace, but of works, just as Paul argued.

So, can we agree that the remission of sins for Israel was a critical element for them to be saved? They could not possibly be saved if their sins were still upon them. I'm sure we can agree with that.

Is it because Israel was under a different set of requirements for salvation that bothers your train of thought about all this? Israel had a special purpose in God's plans. They alone were the kings and priests unto the Most High God, not Gentiles. They were under the Law, Gentiles were not...except the proselytes into Judaism who became Jews and were therefore beholden to follow the Law of Moses.

Gentiles, however, after the "wall of partition" was taken down when Israel fell, were blessed greatly when salvation came unto them directly without their having to convert to Judaism.

Some out there are bound to have a brain aneurism when reading things that go against their adoption of replacement theology corruptions that are so prolific throughout Evangelical teachings and beliefs. The followers of that garbage may as well join with Obama, Michael and their affiliations with the Muslim Brotherhood with that kind of thinking, for they are all kindred spirits in this regard.

If there's still problems with what's actually written in the scriptures, then please do share so that we can all consider it compared to what's written.

Ephesians 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:

Baptism is of ourselves, for one has to prepare and then walk down into the water and then walk out of the water. What does that water do besides getting one wet? Nothing. Nothing at all for we who are under grace.

MM
Thank you sir. This is a well written and thoughtful response. And replacement theology of any kind is abhorrent IMO. But you know there is a "but" coming.

The Jew should have KNOWN what their tradition of baptism was about and what it pointed to...."Have you not heard?"

Acts 5:31
31 “He is the one whom God exalted to His right hand as a Prince and a Savior, to grant repentance to Israel, and forgiveness of sins.

Acts 10:43
43 “Of Him all the prophets bear witness that through His name everyone who believes in Him receives forgiveness of sins.”
 

Genez

Junior Member
Oct 12, 2017
4,605
793
113
Ok, let's look directly at the teaching of Peter, paying close attention to the wording, and the dilemma should disappear:

Acts 2:37-38
37 Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men and brethren, what shall we do?
38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
Peter's audience were Jews.
Not gentiles.

The Jews he witnessed to had been habitually going to the Temple to offer animal sacrifices for the remission of their sins.

38~~ Then Peter said face to face unto them, for their benefit, all of you repent {change your mind about Christ}. And receive baptism every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ because of the remission {payment for} of sins, and you shall receive the Holy Spirit.

Peter was not only telling these Jews about salvation in Christ, but that the Cross was also the permanent remission for their sins.
It was a salvation message that was law-abiding Jew, specific!

In Christ......
 

Kroogz

Well-known member
Dec 5, 2023
1,780
866
113
@Musicmaster

If I may, Paul uses the same technique in Romans when talking with the Jews.

"confess with your mouth" is used by most believers today for salvation. But it has everything to do with the Shema prayer and the Jews.

Paul was using their traditions of their daily chant Of "believing in the one true God"


Paul was not saying that we need to confess with our mouths to be saved. He was pointing out their traditions pointed to faith alone in Christ alone.
 

Genez

Junior Member
Oct 12, 2017
4,605
793
113
So, can we agree that the remission of sins for Israel was a critical element for them to be saved? They could not possibly be saved if their sins were still upon them. I'm sure we can agree with that.
The Jews Peter witnessed to had been habitually going to the Temple to offer animal sacrifices for the remission of their sins.
Peter was not only telling these Jews about salvation in Christ.
But, that the Cross was also the permanent solution for the post salvation remission for their sins.

It was a salvation message that was also dealing with law-abiding-Jews.


If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. 1 John 1:9​


Because of the Cross?
No more need for blood sacrifices at the Temple!
That was good news for those Jews that had to keep on having messy animal sacrifices for their sins.

Even today, after we are saved, we will still need purification from our sins!

Purification of our sins is what keeps us walking and being filled with the Spirit.
And, SAVED believers can grieve and quench the Spirit, and some so!
But, they are saved.

Apples and oranges...




In Christ......
 
Apr 24, 2025
256
118
43
Romans 9-11 emphasizes that God's covenant with Israel remains valid, and He has not rejected His chosen people. God's plan of salvation includes both Jews and Gentiles, and He uses the Gentiles to provoke the Jews to jealousy, ultimately leading them to salvation.



Israel has not fallen, as in being finished forever.
God has simply put Israel on hold.

On hold until the fullness of the Gentiles comes in.
Then?
The Rapture!

After the Rapture God will commence once more using the Jews as His people, having Jerusalem in Israel as the capital of the world under God for the Millennium.
It sounds like they're following the doctrine of Suppressionism.