Here's a question that popped in my mind. Is it a sin to stand up for yourself in a fighting position?
I am thinking that if you are attacked in a way that is unjustified - "certainly not" is the answer.
We should always do our best to follow the Romans 12:18 directive/instruction. If we do so - God knows our heart and intentions - I do not believe that He would consider standing up for yourself in self-defense to be a sin.
But aren't we supposed to b doing our best to b as much like Jesus as we possibly can ? Jesus says we should offer the other cheek , I think this has two meanings , the literal and the metaphorical , both of these meanings still point to a passive response if we r attacked in any way .
I believe this issue must be looked at from two separated perspectives - balanced against each other:
1) "Is it a sin to stand up for yourself?"
2) "Should you stand up for yourself?"
Since the OP literally asked - and was focused on - the first question, my answer was mainly directed and related to the perspective of that question.
Yes - we should all strive to "be like Jesus" as much as we possibly can - with regard to the distinctive qualities of His character and His personality.
With regard to the "other cheek" meaning...
Matthew 5:
38 Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: 39 But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also. 40 And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloke also. 41 And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain. 42 Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away. 43 Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy. 44 But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you; 45 That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust. 46 For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? do not even the publicans the same? 47 And if ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more than others? do not even the publicans so? 48 Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.
Luke 6:
27 But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you, 28 Bless them that curse you, and pray for them which despitefully use you. 29 And unto him that smiteth thee on the one cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloke forbid not to take thy coat also. 30 Give to every man that asketh of thee; and of him that taketh away thy goods ask them not again. 31 And as ye would that men should do to you, do ye also to them likewise. 32 For if ye love them which love you, what thank have ye? for sinners also love those that love them. 33 And if ye do good to them which do good to you, what thank have ye? for sinners also do even the same. 34 And if ye lend to them of whom ye hope to receive, what thank have ye? for sinners also lend to sinners, to receive as much again. 35 But love ye your enemies, and do good, and lend, hoping for nothing again; and your reward shall be great, and ye shall be the children of the Highest: for he is kind unto the unthankful and to the evil. 36 Be ye therefore merciful, as your Father also is merciful.
I believe that the intent of these passages - with regard to what it is trying to teach us - leans more towards us having a temperament that does not give in to being aggressive, argumentative, hateful, vindictive, etc. - being restrained by ingrained character trait and self-discipline to not react/reciprocate to such things directed at us (in the 'active' sense) - rather than taking on a completely acquiescent posture to everything that happens in life (in the 'passive' sense).
It is the
Golden Rule from two different perspectives at the same time - as 'primary' and 'secondary' precepts:
1) Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.
2) Even if/after others do evil/wrong unto you - you
still do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
In other words, do not retaliate; rather, be consistent in loving your fellowman/neighbor/enemy/whoever.
I believe that self-defense and defense of others is a matter of a different perspective.
If I happen upon a man attempting to rape a woman - should I just let it happen?
Of course not - I should defend her from the attack of the man to prevent it.
If a man walks up to a woman and says that he intends to rape and kill her - should she just let it happen according to his will and plan? Or, should she provide resistance in an effort to escape the inevitable conclusion?
I realize that the proper "answer" in this scenario is highly context-and-situation based; however, I am speaking in the general sense whereby there is no worthwhile trade-off (in the woman's mind) to be had in allowing it - i.e. protecting her children, etc. - i.e. there are only two realistic options - which are to just let it happen or to try to escape it.
I know that there may possibly come a time, as a Christian, when you are certain that you have "reached the end" - you submit to allowing yourself to be tortured and killed for the cause of Christ. And, I know that - to a certain degree - this principle also holds true for "lesser" things they may experience in this life - also for the cause of Christ.
However, I also believe that in everything there must be a 'balance' for the "common normal continuance of things" - to maintain that which [simply] needs to proceed and must be allowed...
In general, for the society-level equation, there are things that simply must be allowed to exist if we are to maintain a reasonable and sensible existence. This requires an active measure of resistance to the escalation of evil on earth - as opposed to just letting it operate unbridled.
Common sense is also necessary.
If a stranger comes up to you on the street in the city and asks you to let them borrow $1000 from you...
1) If you have $1000 - will you immediately let them borrow it?
2) If you do not have $1000 - will you scrape to find it so that you can let them borrow it?
(Just because they asked you and the verse says do not turn them away?)
If a stranger comes up to you on the street in the city and asks you to
give them money...
(And, what if they ask for $100 or $1000.)
If you know that they are going to use the money for an evil purpose - will you give it to them?
(Just because they asked you and the verse says do not turn them away?)
If we are to be good stewards of what God has given to us - shall we give it freely to evil-doers?
Or, should we apply a measure of good discernment to passages of scripture so that we may properly determine the true nature of what it is trying to get us to understand?
Even when we talk about taking the Bible literally, there must be a certain measure of common sense applied to it.
The only other thing I might say at this point:
"Let every soul do according to their measure of faith."