Welcome to the Kamala Harris Presidential Campaign

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,471
13,414
113
58
hearing reports of the same thing here in georgia..
Also hearing reports of the same in Kansas City Kansas. In one of those reports, there was a woman who put hers through three times before it came out correct. Afterwards she was wondering if Harris still got those two votes that went through in error. The lady commented, "they are at it again and they are good at it!" Very cunning.
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
36,447
6,672
113
Also hearing reports of the same in Kansas City Kansas. In one of those reports, there was a woman who put hers through three times before it came out correct. Afterwards she was wondering if Harris still got those two votes that went through in error. The lady commented, "they are at it again and they are good at it!" Very cunning.
that won't work, if you count 3 votes for 1 ballot it will be obvious
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
36,447
6,672
113
‘Everyone is telling them they’re a band of idiots’: Harris campaign staff ‘exhausted’


Since she became VP 92% of those she hired have left. Can you imagine the humiliation of being one of these useful idiots who have been supporting her? Generally no one is so stupid to do that openly, rather they simply try to attack Trump and say why you shouldn't vote for him.

"She doesn't want to be advised and she won't read briefing documents"
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
36,447
6,672
113
I think

"We cannot despair"

should be her new unofficial campaign slogan.
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
36,447
6,672
113

gb9

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2011
12,296
6,667
113
Kamala Says Her ‘Team of Experts’ is Prepared if Trump Declares Victory Early, as Election Tabulation Could Drag On for Days, if Not Weeks

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/10/kamala-says-her-team-experts-is-prepared-if/

It could take days or weeks in order for Kamala's "team of experts" to secure the steal!
so, i have asked several liberals this question- how was it back in the '80s and '90s. with far less technology . we had the results the next day.
got a lot of blah blah blah, but no sensible answer..
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
36,447
6,672
113
so, i have asked several liberals this question- how was it back in the '80s and '90s. with far less technology . we had the results the next day.
got a lot of blah blah blah, but no sensible answer..
That is easy to answer. Back then election fraud was simple, you paid people to vote for your candidate and you stuffed ballots.

But now with a hundred million people voting or more it is far more complicated. Anal people want to make sure that only registered voters vote, that the number of people who vote does not exceed the number of registered voters, and they actually have the nerve to check voting records, etc. You can't pay off 10 million people to vote for your candidate without a few of them blabbing to the press. So then the solution is to get the voter rolls after the election and then do mail in ballots using names of those who didn't vote. You need to know how many to fill in so you have to wait until they have counted all the votes and you would be surprised how long it takes to write 100,000 different names on mail in ballots. Also you don't want to hire too many people because of the problem with blabbing to the press. Of course the only way you can do this is if there is no signature verfication. Even with that it is a very complicated and time consuming process.

Also Elon Musk has thrown an entirely new wrench into the process. Suppose 85 million people sign his petition for Trump. You can't claim that 70 million voted for Trump when 85 million signed that. Now suppose 50 million vote for Kamala. Are you really going to fill out 35 million mail in ballots?
 

gb9

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2011
12,296
6,667
113
That is easy to answer. Back then election fraud was simple, you paid people to vote for your candidate and you stuffed ballots.

But now with a hundred million people voting or more it is far more complicated. Anal people want to make sure that only registered voters vote, that the number of people who vote does not exceed the number of registered voters, and they actually have the nerve to check voting records, etc. You can't pay off 10 million people to vote for your candidate without a few of them blabbing to the press. So then the solution is to get the voter rolls after the election and then do mail in ballots using names of those who didn't vote. You need to know how many to fill in so you have to wait until they have counted all the votes and you would be surprised how long it takes to write 100,000 different names on mail in ballots. Also you don't want to hire too many people because of the problem with blabbing to the press. Of course the only way you can do this is if there is no signature verfication. Even with that it is a very complicated and time consuming process.

Also Elon Musk has thrown an entirely new wrench into the process. Suppose 85 million people sign his petition for Trump. You can't claim that 70 million voted for Trump when 85 million signed that. Now suppose 50 million vote for Kamala. Are you really going to fill out 35 million mail in ballots?
very good take.
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
36,447
6,672
113
The more you know...


Kamala Harris is a serial plagiarizer.
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
36,447
6,672
113
One very big debate is whether the word "apostasy" refers to a falling away, or the departure of the raptured saints. I would argue that it refers to winnowing the Barley. When you harvest barley you let it dry out for three weeks and then you can pour the grains back and forth into buckets and the husks will fall away, they will depart as the grains are then taken to the barn.

So yes, the departure of the husks must come first and in our experience that is the apostate pastors and churches revealing just how dried up and far from the Lord they have become until they are completely separated from the grains of barley which are taken to the Father's house.
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
36,447
6,672
113
A few days ago two students at a university where Kamala was holding a rally were kicked out because they said "Jesus is Lord" and "Christ is king".

Yesterday in Michigan people were chanting "We want Trump" at her rally and they weren't kicked out.

Clearly she got reamed behind the scenes by how damaging it was to her campaign to kick out Christians. So now she is afraid to kick people out. This is gonna be a disaster for her. Either they so thoroughly vet crowds coming to her rally that the crowds are tiny or their will be people chanting for Trump at every one of her rallies.

She tried to act tough but she is considered a clown, not to be taken seriously.

She is going to be openly mocked and ridiculed. You reap what you sow.
 
Oct 24, 2024
64
9
8
She's a wack job for sure. Wanting to kill babies and stop reproduction
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
36,447
6,672
113
Question for thought.

Suppose Kamala Harris campaign is a compete disaster and Trump wins in a landslide, a plausible scenario. Do you think the DNC will go back to letting Democrats choose their candidate by voting in the primaries?
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,668
1,098
113
Question for thought.

Suppose Kamala Harris campaign is a compete disaster and Trump wins in a landslide, a plausible scenario. Do you think the DNC will go back to letting Democrats choose their candidate by voting in the primaries?
Suppose monkeys fly out of my butt
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
36,447
6,672
113
Suppose monkeys fly out of my butt
You are probably right, what are the chances of the DNC which is fully demon possessed of doing that, it is absurd.
 

Bob-Carabbio

Well-known member
Jun 24, 2020
1,602
803
113

Sean Spicer hits the nail on the head. If Kamala becomes president prior to the election it will improve her chances of getting elected. However, it can't be by the 25th amendment because that would undermine everything, nor can it be by Biden resigning. Both of those expose the cover up of his mental condition. No, if Biden dies then they will talk about him as a saint and a hero. If this happens prior to the DNC then they can have a period of mourning followed by the DNC heroically going on because Joe would want that. We'll be treated to the inside story of how Joe didn't want to drop out but then on his death bed he handed over the baton to Kamala, etc. etc. etc.

These people will do whatever it takes to stay in power.

Also I think she'll pick Elizabeth Warren to be the VP on the ticket with her. I say this because Trump's biggest problem is with liberal women. They will be able to attack him as a mysogynist, racist (Pocahontas). It will be the perfect DEI hire.
Too late!!! I already voted all RED (not Allred - chuckle).