Weather patterns are constantly changing, but that is nothing to be alarmed about. You take things as they come. But what happened a few decades ago is that CO2 -- which is actually beneficial and necessary for plant life -- was made into a bogeyman in order to promote a specific agenda created by the Western elites (China, India, and Russia do not give a hoot about Climate Change).
So the nonsense about "greenhouse gases" and "fossil fuels" (which do not come from fossils) began to be promoted, and bogus studies began to be published (which have all been debunked). Greenhouses are beneficial to produce food when the climate is too severe, so why would greenhouse gases be harmful? Yet no one stopped to ask this simple question.
And CO2 is used by plants which then release oxygen, which is beneficial to humans.
"Photosynthesis, the process by which green plants and certain other organisms transform light energy into chemical energy. During photosynthesis in green plants, light energy is captured and used to convert water, carbon dioxide, and minerals into oxygen and energy-rich organic compounds." -- Britannica This was God's
But the total C02 content of the earth's atmosphere is only 0.04%, (up from 0.02%). And there is no hard data to prove that this increase has harmed anything. Actually vegetation has flourished.
As to so-called "fossil fuels", they cannot be obtained strictly from fossils. But God had placed layers of oil deep down under the surface of the earth, and that is what is being pumped out. With improvements in technology, vehicles are not releasing a lot of harmful gases, and the use of coal has been improved to reduce CO2 emissions.
But how do you control people and take away their freedoms? By fear-mongering. The COVID19 "pandemic" was all about fear-mongering, because had HCQ and Ivermectin been freely available, not one person would have died. So the governments and the medical establishments sabotages these early treatments and substituted lethal mRNA bioweapons instead. All of this ties together.
Less than one degree rises in global temperatures are SIGNIFICANT? That is highly doubtful. Had temperatures increased by 5 to 10 degrees that might have been significant. "On paleoclimate time scales, however,
the cause-effect direction is reversed: temperature changes cause subsequent CO2/CH4 changes."
On the causal structure between CO2 and global temperature | Scientific Reports (nature.com) Paleoclimate means over tens of thousands of years.
Anyway, I need to start a thread on the Net Zero Hoax.