Do you agree with this assessment of the Assassination attempt?

It is inexcusable to jump to conclusions concerning an assassination attempt before the facts are in

Are all the facts in yet? .

Sufficient facts are in to conclude there must have been two shooters. The audio file confirms that as well as the direction the bullet was fired from compared to where the 20 year old man on the roof was. We can conclude the direction the bullet came from photographs of where Trump was when hit as well as where the bullets behind Trump hit. All you need is two points to give you a straight line. This evidence eliminates the theory that the 20 year old was a lone wolf.

We have quite a few facts that support the idea of a conspiracy. Generally you need two or three witnesses and we have much more than that.

We also have more that enough facts to question everyone involved in the security including the director of the Secret Service and prosecute them.

We also have enough evidence for a grand jury concerning Blackrock and all those involved in shorting Trump's company 24 hours before the assassination attempt.

Do you agree or disagree.

The police that saw him on the roof were told to leave the rally by the director of Secret Service. The police that were in the command center were told to go to McDonalds during the rally. The SS sniper had the 20 years old in his sights for three minutes but was not given the go ahead to shoot. There was an open window in the zone that the Secret Service was responsible for with a clear line of sight to the President. This is a clear violation of their protocol. The ladder that the 20 year old climbed up to get on the roof was not placed there by him. We are now told he was scoping out Trump and Biden for months, therefore he should have popped up on the SS radar. That is six things that this 20 year old didn't do but that had to be done for him to get up on that roof and have a shot at the president. All six were done by the Secret Service or by those supplying the security to the president.

It is obviously not a 20 year old operating on his own, so why is @FollowerofShiloh so insistent that we stop connecting the dots to the Secret Service?

You really seem to have an axe to grind about FollowerofShiloh. To hear you tell it, the dude is at least a government shill, here to spread disinformation. Maybe a government spy too.

Uh... Yeah. I'm sure the Biden admin really cares what a few people in a little Christian forum on the wane in a remote corner of the internet think, and how to influence them. Sure. That's gotta be it.

To assume they even know we exist is a massive leap that requires a LOT of ego.

I do not know that.

What I do know is that we have been discussing this assassination attempt. Everyone has their own perspective and none of us has all the facts. However, for some reason he is very invested in saying that there was a lone shooter, that is all there is to it, and anyone who says otherwise he insults and mocks. These claims were made in all caps, in big bold orange letters, it was as though he was screaming at the rest of us to stop asking questions.

Meanwhile the evidence has come out conclusively that Thomas was not the only shooter and that the Security detail around Trump had 9 failures which allowed this assassination attempt. We had one person say that everyone makes mistakes and that we should assume a 1% error rate. OK, the odds of 9 errors then would be 0.01x0.01x0.01x0.01x0.01x0.01x0.01x0.01x0.01 = 0.000000000000000001 or a 99.999999999999999999% chance that it wasn't an error but rather intentional. I'll take those odds.

I don't claim to know anymore than the facts that have been slowly coming out. However, I will assume that the government officials who have demanded the resignation/firing of the Director of the Secret Service have access to all the facts currently available and they have determined she is fully culpable.

So I have taken issue with his claim that he knows something that no one else seems to know. That he is telling everyone else to stop asking questions when we are only one week into this, and that he is insulting to those of us who do ask questions. I have also noted that the three biggest trolls on this issue have all joined this forum in 2024. We are not ignorant of Biden's devices, we know they employ people to influence people on social media and that would include this forum. I think it is relevant to a discussion that when someone seems very unreasonable and refuses to look at the facts that you understand who you are dealing with.

The other two trolls have been completely reprehensible and despicable in what they have said. So of the three FollowerofShiloh is the only one I even bothered to engage. The other two were reported for gross and despicable comments. There is one other person that I have quoted as a gaslighter. But at least he is not spewing the most vile hatred.