Could Trump do anything to make you stop supporting him?
- Thread starter ResidentAlien
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
- Status
The shooter had an engineering and science degree. He did not spend any time on social media like many of us do which includes participating in this website [CC]. The guy was brilliant. He just could not shoot to save himself if he had to but he came close.
Personally, after praying, this was a random deal. He is not connected to anyone. He just evidently did not like Trump.
Personally, after praying, this was a random deal. He is not connected to anyone. He just evidently did not like Trump.
-
1
- Show all
I saw that too, when you build a profile of this guy, it does not look good considering his rejections and bullying he received in school.
His school classmate says that he was bullied.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...w-Crooks-rejected-high-school-rifle-team.html
His school classmate says that he was bullied.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...w-Crooks-rejected-high-school-rifle-team.html
-
1
-
1
- Show all
Yes, and they all said he was intelligent. Most of the scientist like Fucci were mistreated and bullied. They went on to do good things in spite of people hating them. I think he doesn't like Old People. Working in a Nursing Home maybe he thought Trump would cut benefits. Who knows, maybe had he succeeded and lived he would have went after the other Geriatric running for Democrat.
He clearly acted alone.
He clearly acted alone.
On a national scale when you attack figures of state, there's usually social turbulence that follows. I have seen this with my own eyes in my birth country.
And, on an age where the internet is basically the fuel for radicalization, this danger can be amplified greatly.
Pray for peace in the nation.
And, on an age where the internet is basically the fuel for radicalization, this danger can be amplified greatly.
Pray for peace in the nation.
-
1
- Show all
Jonathan Turley
@JonathanTurley
...The decision is another example of how Smith misplayed his hand in piling on charges in Flordia. If he had simply gone forward with the obstruction charge, he could have had a trial before the election...
@JonathanTurley
...The decision is another example of how Smith misplayed his hand in piling on charges in Flordia. If he had simply gone forward with the obstruction charge, he could have had a trial before the election...
@PhilHollowayEsq
·
1h
Hi Chris. Just FYI District Court judges are fully authorized and capable of independent legal analysis and are not obligated to follow “precedent” if it isn’t directly applicable or if they believe said precedent was wrongly decided etc. I hope this helps you understand courts
But here's the problem:
1. National Archives officials testify that every administration since Reagan has mishandled classified material | CNN Politics
2. Then they go on to say that the problem extends beyond the Oval Office.
“Testimony from the National Archives and Records Administration officials makes clear that the handling and mishandling of classified documents are a problem that stretches beyond the Oval Office,” Turner said in a statement.
3. Then there is the issue of calling something "classified" in order to hide it from the public.
4. Then there is the issue of REDACTING everything so that the end result is zero.
5. Then there is the issue of traitors leaking the really sensitive information to the press or to the enemies, so that in the end the whole business of "classified" is a big joke.
If some unbiased and knowledgeable person were to sit down and sift through a random sample of so-called "classified" documents, he would find that perhaps only 5-10% of those were sensitive national security documents.
1. National Archives officials testify that every administration since Reagan has mishandled classified material | CNN Politics
2. Then they go on to say that the problem extends beyond the Oval Office.
“Testimony from the National Archives and Records Administration officials makes clear that the handling and mishandling of classified documents are a problem that stretches beyond the Oval Office,” Turner said in a statement.
3. Then there is the issue of calling something "classified" in order to hide it from the public.
4. Then there is the issue of REDACTING everything so that the end result is zero.
5. Then there is the issue of traitors leaking the really sensitive information to the press or to the enemies, so that in the end the whole business of "classified" is a big joke.
If some unbiased and knowledgeable person were to sit down and sift through a random sample of so-called "classified" documents, he would find that perhaps only 5-10% of those were sensitive national security documents.
@DebraRu66150029
Her decision is based on Jack Smith never having been confirmed by the senate nor having a top secret security clearance. He had neither. Furthermore, it will take YEARS to appeal, when/if it is, it will go before the SC, whose justices will NOT go against Justice Thomas’s decision on presidential immunity.
Her decision is based on Jack Smith never having been confirmed by the senate nor having a top secret security clearance. He had neither. Furthermore, it will take YEARS to appeal, when/if it is, it will go before the SC, whose justices will NOT go against Justice Thomas’s decision on presidential immunity.
If we wanted justice, which has disappeared almost altogether, then Biden and Trump would be tried at the same time for the same offence. Then there would be no trial before the election. This was all LAWFARE and nothing else. They wanted to bankrupt Trump, but failed. They wanted to kill him but failed. So what are they going to do now? They all know that they are facing prison time for doing what they have done. Not just to Trump but to the country.
- Status