The Covid CANCER Shot!

I think there will be a LOT more deaths.

However, IMO, Cahill is a little suspect.

If you watch a few of her videos and interviews, she claims everything from inventing Velcro to working on the space shuttle!!

Obviously I’m kidding about those things, but she thinks she’s an expert, or worked on just about everything.

She also has a bizarre story about her or maybe her daughter being abducted, all in an effort to deny her a pension.

I have read that some of the aforementioned "prominent, world class, medical scientists" have been working on ways to reverse or minimize the damaging effects of the mRNA jabs.

Perhaps, there may be hope of a "time extension" for many of those who have been jabbed...

Again - time will tell.

And if a significant percentage of the shots were saline - say 1/3 or 2/3 - it will be even more difficult to prove the extent of their deadliness in 5 years time.

One thing I thought was really strange was that there was a look-up for people taking the shots who were in different areas. Like, I understand that some were turned away if they went to get their dose in an area that they weren't expected at. Why should it matter who someone is or where someone turns up to get it, if it's the same for everyone? Or perhaps those who were more anti-government or more difficult to deal with were given a deadlier dose than others seen as complacent, obedient Commies?

Trust but verify


Let's consider a few examples:


1. "the vaccine is safe and effective" -- How do you know, let's see the evidence that proves that is true.


2. "the pandemic came from a bat cave and did not come from the Wuhan bioweapons lab" -- How do you know, let's see the evidence that proves that is true.


3. "Masks work" -- How do you know, let's see the evidence that proves that is true.


4. "We need to send $140 billion to Ukraine for their defense" -- How do you know, let's see the evidence that proves that is true.


5. "Jan 6th was worse than 911 or Pearl Harbor" -- How do you know, let's see the evidence that proves that is true.


When you make a mistake you will continue to make the same mistake until you figure out why. The problem is not that someone else lied, or deceived you or tricked you. Putting the blame on others will never protect you from being scammed. You have to figure out what you did that left you open to being scammed.


So why were they duped about the vaccine during the pandemic?


1. They watched too much TV. They let MSNBC and NPR and CNN lie to them and they treated them like authorities. Prior to 2020 there was plenty of evidence to not trust them. For 3 years they told you daily "orange man bad" and "where there's smoke there is fire" with regards to the Mueller investigation. But what happened when Mueller submitted his findings, they went silent. If they had spent a few minutes to find out what the Mueller report said then they would have lost trust in CNN, MSNBC, and NPR and would not have allowed them to dupe them about the vaccine.


2. They were willing to let Fauci tell them what to think rather than to think critically. I also had complete trust in Fauci when he first started speaking, but I was listening for an explanation that I could then share with my students. I wanted to be educated about why, the people who were duped did not care about why, "just tell me what to do". That is how you become mindless.


3. People were willing to turn against the people trying to help them. I am the only person in my family who is a scientist. Yet they were willing to believe I was "anti science". As a teacher I had all my shots and yet they were willing to believe I was "anti vaxx". That doesn't make sense. Why are you so willing to listen to someone on TV who is not providing any evidence for their claims, and yet they are telling you to ignore people close to you who are warning you that this was a lie.


These are three major mistakes that each of us should become aware of and learn from.


In this particular case the logic was completely distorted. I was warning people that something was not right and Fauci was not to be trusted. They wanted to know why. How could I possibly know why? Answering that question can take years, it is absurd to respond "it doesn't make sense so I'll go ahead and trust him" even though he was clearly lying. They would also ask for proof that the vaccine was dangerous. Again, faulty logic, the vaccine maker should be the one required to give you proof it is safe, not the other way around. How would I have access to that proof? It took six months after the vaccine mandate before a judge ordered the Pfizer documents released.


Instead what people should have been asking was "why are they violating the law concerning experimental vaccines?" Also, "why are they mandating a vaccine to people with little or no risk from Covid?" Also, "why do you have to mandate a life saving wonder vaccine that will save lives?"


Everyone should have known that something was rotten, it didn't smell right, and they should have refused to take the vaccine. Even if they decided they would take the vaccine they never should have required others to take it if they didn't want it and they most certainly should not have insulted, ridiculed, mocked and shun those who questioned Fauci and the vaccine.


Unless people deal with those issues they will continue to be duped.


Deuteronomy 7:15 The LORD will keep you free from every disease. He will not inflict on you the horrible diseases you knew in Egypt, but he will inflict them on all who hate you.


There was a panic that we saw among people over this "pandemic" that demonstrated a complete lack of faith in the Lord Jesus and the word of God. I am not saying that going to the doctor or taking medicine is due to a lack of faith, what I am saying is that the "panic" was a symptom of a lack of faith.


If you weren't panicked you would say "thank you for this vaccine, now can I see the research on this that shows it is safe and effective?" They refused to show you that. So you then ask "well, by law you can't mandate an Experimental Use vaccine without showing me the research, so it is not an acceptable response to refuse, that is illegal." They would respond that you are anti science and anti vaxx, to which you would then respond "I am neither, but you are clearly a liar, a cheat and a slanderer. I don't trust you, so no, I will not take your vaccine."


Psalm 91:3 Surely he shall deliver thee from the snare of the fowler, and from the noisome pestilence. 4 He shall cover thee with his feathers, and under his wings shalt thou trust: his truth shall be thy shield and buckler. 5 Thou shalt not be afraid for the terror by night; nor for the arrow that flieth by day; 6 Nor for the pestilence that walketh in darkness; nor for the destruction that wasteth at noonday.

U.S. Government ‘Cartel’ Paid CVS, Walgreens Billions to Reject Ivermectin Prescriptions, Push COVID Shots
by John-Michael Dumais | The Defender
May 22nd 2024, 5:37 am

Dr. James Thorp and attorney Maggie Thorp on Monday published an article in America Out Loud News exposing the U.S. government’s scheme to suppress ivermectin and push COVID-19 shots using some of the nearly $200 billion in “provider relief funds” allocated to hospitals and pharmacies during the pandemic.

Investigation ‘likely to be far darker’ than most could imagine.

A “cartel” led by the U.S. government allegedly bribed large pharmacy chains like Walgreens and CVS with billions of dollars in contracts to promote COVID-19 vaccines and not fill prescriptions for ivermectin.
Dr. James Thorp and attorney Maggie Thorp on Monday published an article in America Out Loud News exposing the government’s scheme to suppress the Nobel prize-winning drug using some of the nearly $200 billion in “provider relief funds” allocated to hospitals and pharmacies during the pandemic.
The article highlights the controversy surrounding ivermectin, a drug that was “baselessly maligned” by the government, media and medical establishment despite its demonstrated efficacy against COVID-19.
The authors noted former CNN anchor Chris Cuomo’s recent disclosure that he was taking ivermectin for long COVID — or for his COVID-19 vaccine injury, which he implied but didn’t confirm.
Cuomo admitted, “We were given bad information about ivermectin,” and asked, “The real question is, why?

While Cuomo fell short of taking responsibility for his role in quashing the drug and shaming vaccine refusers, his reversal on ivermectin sparked a new round of debate about the broad conspiracy to suppress effective and inexpensive therapeutics during the pandemic.

The Thorps’ exposé comes as Steve Kirsch shared on X (formerly known as Twitter) today that California healthcare facilities and other organizations received a total of $9.2 billion from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Provider Relief Fund to “push the jabs on everyone.”

Pharmacies ‘brazen in their refusal to fill ivermectin prescriptions’
In their article, the Thorps quoted Dr. Pierre Kory’s book, “The War on Ivermectin: The Medicine that Saved Millions and Could Have Ended the Pandemic,” describing the suppression of therapeutics occurring at the height of the pandemic.
“In the wake of the global horse-dewormer propaganda campaign, hospitals started pulling ivermectin from their pharmacies,” Kory wrote.
Kory, a pulmonologist and co-founder and president emeritus of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, described hospital health systems threatening to fire employees if they prescribed the drug and pharmacies becoming “even more brazen in their refusal to fill ivermectin prescriptions.”
Some of these same pharmacies claim they are still prohibited from filling ivermectin prescriptions as a COVID-19 treatment, according to the Thorps.
According to Kory, the results of over 100 trials show that ivermectin could have effectively treated the virus and saved countless lives.
Paying pharmacies not to fill ivermectin prescriptions was only one element of a multi-prong strategy that included threats against doctors, ranging from shaming to loss of hospital access.
The Thorps cited the case of Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, who had her hospital privileges suspended for speaking out about her success treating patients with ivermectin.
Despite the suppression of ivermectin, credible sources reported U.S. Congress members in 2021 were taking the drug for COVID-19.

‘Trusted’ sources chose ‘profit over people’
CVS and Walgreens are the two largest pharmacies in the U.S., with nearly 18,000 locations between them.
One contract from 2022 shows CVS potentially receiving over $2.1 billion for a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) program called ICATT, or “Increasing Community Access to Testing for COVID-19,” that funded more than 19,000 testing sites targeting the uninsured and underinsured.
Walgreens, another recipient of provider relief funds, in 2022 ran a “public relations propaganda piece” featuring a trusted “Walgreens healthcare supervisor” expressing his “big relief” at finally being able to give his 3-year-old daughter a COVID-19 shot.
The Thorps also cited examples of these pharmacies running propaganda pieces featuring high-profile figures — like then-director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Dr. Anthony Fauci and then-director of the CDC Dr. Rochelle Walensky — receiving their COVID-19 boosters at Walgreens and CVS locations.

The Thorps suggested that if the public became aware of ivermectin’s potential effectiveness against COVID-19, the market for the government’s mRNA vaccines might have collapsed, jeopardizing the prospective profits of the “medical-industrial complex.”
“Why in the world would any supplier want to promote or prescribe a cheap and readily available drug — like Ivermectin — if doing so would throw a wrench into potential billion-dollar cash-cow contracts with the federal government?” they asked.
“The U.S. government targeted and paid off ‘trusted’ sources to purposefully spoon-feed bad and even dangerous information to everyday Americans,” they wrote. “These ‘trusted’ sources chose profits over people.”
The article contains links to government contracting sites and other sources for those who want to do their own research.
Investigation ‘likely to be far darker’ than most could imagine
As more information comes to light about the potential efficacy of ivermectin and the alleged financial incentives that may have influenced the actions of major pharmacies, the Thorps called for accountability and further investigation.
However, they cautioned against half-hearted efforts to take responsibility, citing The New York Times’ recent article about COVID-19 vaccine injuries as an attempt to “admit mistakes were made and play dumb while trying to frame the human carnage as limited.”
However, they warned that what an investigation would uncover is “likely to be far darker and run far deeper than most Americans want to imagine.”

If only - the population-at-large had that much moral conscience and backbone - and, were willing to stand together - to make the difference...

When something like this is proven/shown to be true - the entire population should boycott the company until they go completely out of business...

THAT is how you keep stuff like this from happening. You possess a good moral conscience and a strong backbone - and, do what is necessary when necessary to send the message that you aren't going to put up with that crap...

https://x.com/Idonotconsent6/status/1792990431648551385

this is no surprise for a lot of us, just confirmation of what we already know....

I agree that we should never shop there ever again.

Remember the Target decide-your-own-gender bathroom-access thing?

I have not entered a Target store since I learned the details of it around that time - and - intend to maintain the practice "for life"...

I believe it would take a great deal of "reformation" on Target's part (complete 'repentance' - policy reversal, etc. - active stance against evil for good) for me to change my mind.

https://x.com/Idonotconsent6/status/1792990431648551385

That's powerful information.

2 years ago, i went into target , looking for something for a friend.
from the time i got there, till the time i left, ( about 15 minutes) i felt horrible, everything in me was saying" get the h e double hockey sticks outta here and never come back".

i got what i came for, left, and have not and will not go back..

I agree that we should never shop there ever again.