I keep seeing this phrase thrown around and the ambiguity of it bothers me. So, I thought it might be good that we discuss what we mean by the phrase, “God’s calling” or “Are you called to do such and such?” I have some concerns about such phrases and thought maybe by writing I could parse it out a bit. But first, let’s look at how “God’s calling” can be understood and then discuss the finer points…
1). God’s invitation to the whole world to salvation.
2). God’s determination of the elect to be saved.
3). God’s invitation to engage in a particular type of work.
4). God’s mandate or declaration that tells/authorizes a person to engage in a particular kind of work (i.e. ministry).
So, what I am interested in discussing in this thread is categories 3 & 4. There are already plenty of threads on here that discuss God’s sovereignty with regards to individual salvation and whether or not God’s call to salvation is an open invitation to all or a specific election of an individual.
My concerns with categories 3 & 4 is often people speak of being “called” to do something as if it is a given that everyone understands what is meant. Even more concerning, is that people will use this language to indicate they have the “right” or even unquestioned authority to do something or that someone does not have the right or authority to do something if their “call” doesn’t meet some obscure standard. In other words, it concerns me that the be-all end-all response to a question about being involved in ministry is “are you called?” What does this mean? Does this mean that in order to be involved in ministry, someone must be “called” like one of the prophets or Apostles? Does this include direct, personal interaction with Jesus? An audible voice of God from a burning bush? An angelic visitation or a vision?
It seems to me that most who refer to such a “call“ is more of a strong, internal push to do a thing and perhaps some affirmation by other Christians that this is, indeed, God’s will. Or maybe an unusual circumstance happened that they took to be a divine invitation. Is such a view Biblical? Does the Bible teach that someone who wants to teach in the local church needs a particular “calling” and if so, how is it defined? I agree that certainly some people were “called” to do various things in the Bible. But does the Bible teach that anyone who wants to preach at a local church or be an elder needs a specific, supernatural calling?
I suppose a follow-up question to that would be, “If you believe this would be required for someone in a ministry role in the local church, why is this not required for any and every vocation?” Does God only care specifically about the occupations of those in ministry and not his children in other fields? Does this mean that being a plumber is less important and not a means of engaging in ministry as a more performative role like preaching on a Sunday? If a call is required for a ministry role, how can those who are placing someone in a teaching/preaching/elder/deacon role in the local church be assured that the person they are accepting is really “called?” Do they need to receive a separate “call,” “vision,” “gut feeling” that the leader has really been called? Should they just be trusted, or do we have to determine the validity of their call by hearing the story of their calling and determining if it is legitimate or not?
My point in starting this thread is not to blast out my own opinion, but to create a dialogue about what people actually mean when they use this language and what their expectations/understanding is when others use the language. Then, once we get an understanding of one another, we can discuss our understanding of the Bible and why we feel our views are scripturally valid.
1). God’s invitation to the whole world to salvation.
2). God’s determination of the elect to be saved.
3). God’s invitation to engage in a particular type of work.
4). God’s mandate or declaration that tells/authorizes a person to engage in a particular kind of work (i.e. ministry).
So, what I am interested in discussing in this thread is categories 3 & 4. There are already plenty of threads on here that discuss God’s sovereignty with regards to individual salvation and whether or not God’s call to salvation is an open invitation to all or a specific election of an individual.
My concerns with categories 3 & 4 is often people speak of being “called” to do something as if it is a given that everyone understands what is meant. Even more concerning, is that people will use this language to indicate they have the “right” or even unquestioned authority to do something or that someone does not have the right or authority to do something if their “call” doesn’t meet some obscure standard. In other words, it concerns me that the be-all end-all response to a question about being involved in ministry is “are you called?” What does this mean? Does this mean that in order to be involved in ministry, someone must be “called” like one of the prophets or Apostles? Does this include direct, personal interaction with Jesus? An audible voice of God from a burning bush? An angelic visitation or a vision?
It seems to me that most who refer to such a “call“ is more of a strong, internal push to do a thing and perhaps some affirmation by other Christians that this is, indeed, God’s will. Or maybe an unusual circumstance happened that they took to be a divine invitation. Is such a view Biblical? Does the Bible teach that someone who wants to teach in the local church needs a particular “calling” and if so, how is it defined? I agree that certainly some people were “called” to do various things in the Bible. But does the Bible teach that anyone who wants to preach at a local church or be an elder needs a specific, supernatural calling?
I suppose a follow-up question to that would be, “If you believe this would be required for someone in a ministry role in the local church, why is this not required for any and every vocation?” Does God only care specifically about the occupations of those in ministry and not his children in other fields? Does this mean that being a plumber is less important and not a means of engaging in ministry as a more performative role like preaching on a Sunday? If a call is required for a ministry role, how can those who are placing someone in a teaching/preaching/elder/deacon role in the local church be assured that the person they are accepting is really “called?” Do they need to receive a separate “call,” “vision,” “gut feeling” that the leader has really been called? Should they just be trusted, or do we have to determine the validity of their call by hearing the story of their calling and determining if it is legitimate or not?
My point in starting this thread is not to blast out my own opinion, but to create a dialogue about what people actually mean when they use this language and what their expectations/understanding is when others use the language. Then, once we get an understanding of one another, we can discuss our understanding of the Bible and why we feel our views are scripturally valid.
- 4
- Show all