Climate change -- Existential threat to humanity

What's REALLY Going On... By The NUMBERS

Yeah... saw something about the ice sheets expanding.

Greta needed a purpose. She admitted that she was lost until she found the cause of settled science of global warming / climate change / climate disruption / whatever it is now. And, she's a useful idiot for those who would seize authoritarian power under the ruse of existential crisis.

Yeah... saw something about the ice sheets expanding.

Greta needed a purpose. She admitted that she was lost until she found the cause of settled science of global warming / climate change / climate disruption / whatever it is now. And, she's a useful idiot for those who would seize authoritarian power under the ruse of existential crisis.

Yeah... saw something about the ice sheets expanding.

Greta needed a purpose. She admitted that she was lost until she found the cause of settled science of global warming / climate change / climate disruption / whatever it is now. And, she's a useful idiot for those who would seize authoritarian power under the ruse of existential crisis.

a writer for the NY Post refers to her as Doom Pixie. poor child.

She is going through the stages of humiliation.

Biden torched for claiming climate change is bigger threat than nuclear war


I have a solution to the problem of burning fossil fuel.

1. Burning of fossil fuel is mainly a problem when we are talking about transportation. Airplanes, Ships, Cars and trains.

So I will give you the solution how we can eliminate the burning of all fossil fuel in transportation.

2. There is also the problem of burning fossil fuel to generate electricity. This can easily be replaced with Nuclear, hydro, and some renewables like solar and wind. Therefore I will just focus on solving the problem with transportation.

1. Airplanes and Ships -- All we need to do is replace these with sail boats, problem solved.

2. Cars and Trucks -- Again, just replace these with horse and buggy. You can also use barges and man made canals.

3. Trains -- replace diesel with electric and use nuclear power to generate the power.

There you go, 0 emissions, problem solved.

i feel a great deal of pity for her.

can you explain how she's being humiliated, please? i don't keep up with much of the climate church's doings.

1. She is being used as a meme

2. Terms like "doom pixie" are terms of ridicule

Who is the face of this climate change protests? AOC, Greta, Dicaprio, etc. These are not scientists, these are people easy to mock and ridicule.

Greta's quote "shame on you" is used a thousand times in any and all videos. It has become a joke and punch line. As a result she does not epitomize truth, honesty, insight, etc. Instead she is now epitomizing teenage angst. You know you are "famous" when the whole world knows you by your first name, but her "fame" is very quickly becoming "infamy". This is what the Lord said about building a house on sand. Her entire thesis is built on sand and as it crumbles beneath her the "edifice" she has built will fall and because her worldwide fame is so great the fall of that edifice will be equally great.

Consider this, when Al Gore made his movie he quoted his college professor. By 2006 you had scientists being referenced and even discussing their research, showing them examining ice cores, making climate models, monitoring CO2 in the atmosphere, etc. But have you seen any of them coming forward to sound an alarm? You hear this repeated ad nauseum by the MSM, and by NPR, and you hear of "letters written" with a whole bunch of signatories, but where are the scientists willing to put their face and their reputation on the line? Instead you get Greta, AOC, and Dicaprio. Three drama queens.

That would simply be unfortunate but they are pushing a "Green New Deal" that involves spending $5 trillion, they fly around the earth in private planes, and people buy into this by making the power grid less reliable, shooting their farmers in the foot, and buying expensive cars that don't work. When you misuse people's trust like this they will go from cheering for you to getting pitchforks and torches. They will ultimately be seen as snake oil salesmen and tarred and feathered.

Read on and become enlightened.

https://vigilantcitizen.com/vigilantreport/the-elite-machine-behind-greta-thunberg/

it is sad what was done to her, being used the way she is.

sad.

She is going through the stages of humiliation.

They will ultimately be seen as snake oil salesmen and tarred and feathered.

1. She is being used as a meme

2. Terms like "doom pixie" are terms of ridicule

Who is the face of this climate change protests? AOC, Greta, Dicaprio, etc. These are not scientists, these are people easy to mock and ridicule.

Greta's quote "shame on you" is used a thousand times in any and all videos. It has become a joke and punch line. As a result she does not epitomize truth, honesty, insight, etc. Instead she is now epitomizing teenage angst. You know you are "famous" when the whole world knows you by your first name, but her "fame" is very quickly becoming "infamy". This is what the Lord said about building a house on sand. Her entire thesis is built on sand and as it crumbles beneath her the "edifice" she has built will fall and because her worldwide fame is so great the fall of that edifice will be equally great.

Consider this, when Al Gore made his movie he quoted his college professor. By 2006 you had scientists being referenced and even discussing their research, showing them examining ice cores, making climate models, monitoring CO2 in the atmosphere, etc. But have you seen any of them coming forward to sound an alarm? You hear this repeated ad nauseum by the MSM, and by NPR, and you hear of "letters written" with a whole bunch of signatories, but where are the scientists willing to put their face and their reputation on the line? Instead you get Greta, AOC, and Dicaprio. Three drama queens.

That would simply be unfortunate but they are pushing a "Green New Deal" that involves spending $5 trillion, they fly around the earth in private planes, and people buy into this by making the power grid less reliable, shooting their farmers in the foot, and buying expensive cars that don't work. When you misuse people's trust like this they will go from cheering for you to getting pitchforks and torches. They will ultimately be seen as snake oil salesmen and tarred and feathered.

I think what will ultimately happen is those saying "drill baby drill" in this election will eventually have to acknowledge that the Generation Z,Millennial ect. voters(Republican's) are not near convinced and that they want the world they will live in much,much cleaner than the older folks that wont be around in the future. I say that because in several different polls the younger voters pretty much are saying that they don't agree with them on the climate issue,,,(younger voters from both parties want to shift to cleaner fuels). https://www.pewresearch.org/short-r...licans-view-climate-change-and-energy-issues/

I think the term "cleaner fuels" is misunderstood much like the term "germs" is misunderstood. 99% of the germs do not harm you and for the most part might even be beneficial. However, when you kill 99% of germs you leave an environment for the 1% you aren't killing to move in and take over. It is like a city where 1% of the residents are criminals so they gas the entire city killing everyone. It is now Mad Max land and it will be taken over by roving gangs of killers. Killing germs doesn't make you safer, in fact those 99% who weren't criminals, they were making you safer.

Likewise with fossil fuel. Pure hydrocarbons are not dirty, it is a simple c.hemical process. Bonds are broken and can be reformed. Yes, there may be some impurities in there that are toxic and should be filtered out in the refining process. By that measure gasoline refined in the US is the cleanest in the world. When the US stops refining gas we don't cut down on gas, instead we simply buy dirty gas from China or some other country.

Second, calling them "fossil fuel" is based on an erroneous theory that has been debunked. There is a carbon cycle, some carbon forms precipitates like methane hydrates and is at the bottom of the ocean. As a result of Plate tectonics this methane is recycled into oil and gas. The more hydrocarbons we burn the more CO2 in the atmosphere the more methane hydrates form in the ocean and the cycle continues.

Past that a person really doesn't need to be an actual climate scientist to figure out that man has a huge impact on the environment all they need to do is look at the grey fog hovering over all the cities.

This is true but the "Climate Emergency" or "Climate Crisis" is totally BOGUS. A very large number of scientists and professionals have published a paper saying exactly that.

Cleaning up the environment is one thing, but destroying everything and everyone because of a perceived "Climate Crisis" is a conspiracy to destroy lives and depopulate the planet.

This is while the globalist "climate" elites fly around the world in their private planes to celebrate the fact that they have fooled just about everyone. And they are also behind the sabotage and destruction of food plants, farms, oil refineries, natural gas manufacturing, etc. Farmers have been put on notice that their livelihoods are gone, and now they are protesting all over the world at this stupidity.

This stupidity is actually the pagan worship of Mother Earth, and they are calling for the destruction of people to "save" Mother Earth. They are ignorant of the fact that this earth will be supernaturally burned up by God and replaced with a New Heavens and a New Earth.