As in the days of Noah... ALL flesh had CORRUPTED itself

Another devastating proof:

Adam had dominion over......EVERYTHING. The entire earth and ever creature upon it.

Adam was the federal head....of the ENTIRE WORLD, including all humankind, but not limited to this only.

And THAT is why:
Rom 5:12
Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world

Matthew 24: 37 But as the days of Noah were, so also will the coming of the Son of Man be.

Why did God utterly destroy, and wipe clean the entire world He created, and everything in it, save Noah, his family, and the selected animals aboard the Ark?

To answer this question we have to closely examine Genesis 6, the fallen angels that mated with human women, their progeny the Nephilim, and the proclamation 4 There were giants (Nephilim) on the earth in those days, AND ALSO AFTERWARD,..

So why do I believe this issue is so important? Because Jesus said in the end days things would be like in the days of Noah. I contend that we are living in the end days, and are doing the same things that that led God to destroy the world.

Matthew 24: 22 And unless those days were shortened, no flesh would be saved;

So first I'll lay out SOME of the vast Biblical proof that fallen angels DID mate with human women producing the Nephillim, hybrid race, the ALSO AFTERWARD, and the CORRUPTED flesh.
Then talk about how we are committing the same sin that they did.

But I will NOT be doing much, if any, debating with those that either can't, or won't accept the plain Biblical truth about fallen angels. That is not speculative. I will be doing some speculation, but that fact is not. If there are honest, skeptical questions fine. But otherwise I'd recommend just scrolling on by.

Not much of an upgrade to be totally evil, non-human and beyond redemption.

Some have opined that Satan's game plan was to create a race of utterly unredeemable souls, thereby ruining God's plan of salvation.

It's the same kind of manipulation advertised as an upgrade that transhumanism is offering using nanobots to splice and dice our genetic code.

Possibly, but Scripture says several times the sins of the FATHER, not the mother are passed down.

No - all sons and daughters receive the same from their father and mother.

Jesus is the only person ever to be conceived not-from-a-human-male-father.

All women have been conceived from a human father.

OK, so then "12 Therefore, just as through one man sin entered the world, and death through sin, and thus death spread to all men, because all sinned"

Does this "one man" refer to Adam? Why wouldn't it refer to Adam and Eve? After all "death spread to all men, because all sinned" refers to both men and women.

No Bible verse is of its own interpretation. We need 3 different Bible verses that go together and say that sin is transferred from one generation to another via the man, otherwise this is a bunch of hokum. Remember, the source of this weird doctrine is the Catholic church trying to say that Mary is sinless or something to that effect. The root is corrupt, you can't make the tree good if the root is corrupt.

No it doesn’t. Women receive that sin nature from their fathers. They do not pass it to their children. Their husbands do.

In the most general sense, this has to be the case. Otherwise, it somehow rests in a combination of [human] DNA from father and mother - whereby, Jesus is the only one not having that combination.

Possibly, but Scripture says several times the sins of the FATHER, not the mother are passed down.

I agree that it is somehow intrinsically linked to human male DNA.

Catholicism is wrong - Mary was a sinner.

Which, of course, is why we need a New Federal Head.
The last one (and all others subsequently) are helpless in remedying the hopeless situation.

Then comes Genesis 15.......the solution. With the attendant sign of.....circumcision.

Yes she was. But she is "inherently" a sinner because she inherited it from the father.

Nowhere in all the Bible, no passage, verse, type, metaphor or parable declares or insinuates in any way
that sin is inherited from the woman.

Only men are commanded to be circumcised. A sign. Of something that only applies to the man.

Sorry....Genesis 17.

Gen 17:11
And ye shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin; and it shall be a token of the covenant betwixt me and you.

The rainbow is also a token of the covenant that we have with God.

Gal 5:6 For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love.

circumcision did not in any way deal with sin or the flesh, it was a token that Abraham had dealt with it by faith.

The rainbow is also a token of the covenant that we have with God.

Gal 5:6 For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love.

circumcision did not in any way deal with sin or the flesh, it was a token that Abraham had dealt with it by faith.

But yet only for males.

That is right, it is a token, a sign that Jesus would be crucified.

Faith in Jesus working through love is what saves us from sin.

The rainbow is also a token of the covenant that we have with God.

Gal 5:6 For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love.

circumcision did not in any way deal with sin or the flesh, it was a token that Abraham had dealt with it by faith.

The rainbow is also a token of the covenant that we have with God.

Gal 5:6 For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love.

circumcision did not in any way deal with sin or the flesh, it was a token that Abraham had dealt with it by faith.

This lecture will certainly answer your immediate questions. And more than that, answer questions that you have not (nor will likely ever) begun to so much as ask.

https://www.sermonaudio.com/solo/cliffside/sermons/21611322382/

I am auditioning this lecture as of today. And believe me.....it is EPIC in scope and devastating in terms of impact.