In heaven we will have a body of flesh and blood. Very interesting because angels can take on human form

I never said that's all they can eat. I said they do have manna to eat so they don't only eat on the Earth.



Everyone KNOWS that.

Where do you get the idea they even eat manna?

Psalms 78:23 Though he had commanded the clouds from above, and opened the doors of heaven,
Psalms 78:24 And had rained down manna upon them to eat, and had given them of the corn of heaven.
Psalms 78:25 Man did eat angels' food: he sent them meat to the full.

The word rendered "angels" - אביר 'abbı̂yr - means properly "strong, mighty," and may be applied to people in general, Judges 5:22; Lamentations 1:15; Jeremiah 46:15; to animals, Psalm 22:13 ("bulls of Bashan"); to princes, Psalm 68:31; or to nobles, Job 24:22. It might be rendered here food of nobles, or princes; that is, food of richer quality, or of a more delicate nature, than common food; such as nobles or princes have on their tables. The immediate connection, however, would rather seem to demand the rendering in our version, as the food is said to have come down from heaven. It is rendered food of angels in the Septuagint, in the Latin Vulgate, in the ancient versions generally, and also by Luther. DeWette renders it, "Each one ate the food of princes;" that is, they all lived like princes.

It's food for angels that was in heaven and was sent down so humans could eat it.

So angels is referring to humans in many examples, but 'strong and mighty men can't 'fall' and be the Nephilim, only angels can?

What says we must regard Satan as included within the nomenclature designating within the group 'sons of God'? Would you assume this if a flock of geese gathered together, and a chicken also came among them?

Oh, I was thinking it was Mary Magdalene
John 20:1 KJV
The first day of the week cometh Mary Magdalene early, when it was yet dark, unto the sepulchre, and seeth the stone taken away from the sepulchre.

I retract my statement. Obviously sons of God at times refers to fallen angels. And if we were to go by the Law of First Mention than in should carry out to all Scripture. But purposely without know for sure to assume that we must be careful.

technically, no one ever seen Jesus bleed after His Resurrection to know if He had blood in His Body.

Jesus here doesn't even mention blood. I am agreeing by the way.

Agreed!

Jesus, even had Thomas put his fingers into the holes in His hands and His Side.
if you stick your finger into a hole that goes into the Body, that's being pierced and should bleed.
but no Blood when Thomas put his finger into the side of Jesus.

if Jesus has no blood, neither would Angels.
you need BLOOD to get WOMEN Pregnant.
why i say, the Fallen Angels of Genesis 6, got women pregnant like the Holy Spirit with Mary...the Spirit planted the fertile Seed/Egg into the womb like in-vitro.

this idea Angels had sex so we will also have sex in Heaven is ludicrous, knowing, YOU NEED BLOOD in Your Body to get someone Pregnant...and Angels, do not have BLOOD [like Jesus, no longer had Blood in His Resurrected Body]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Noone on Earth brings new revelation, that isn't already revealed through the Word of God, which is fullest revelation given to man. Through the moving and operation of the Holy Ghost, I Pray what we say here brings the truth of these Revelations, truth by truth, or precept upon precept, to the heart of the hearer. Lay what we say before the feet of Jesus (Word of God) and compare, the Bible is Always truth, so if they don't match, we need to reevaluate our stance. God Bless and Peace to you all.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

^
Depends upon if you are using the correct Translation. so many errors exist between Hebrew and Greek, Aramaic and Greek, mistakes are all over the English Bibles. But, if you are Jewish, and have access to the Torah/Tanakh, and other ancient Hebrew writings, you will have the Truth.

ד הַנְּפִלִים הָיוּ בָאָרֶץ, בַּיָּמִים הָהֵם, וְגַם אַחֲרֵי-כֵן אֲשֶׁר יָבֹאוּ בְּנֵי הָאֱלֹהִים אֶל-בְּנוֹת הָאָדָם, וְיָלְדוּ לָהֶם: הֵמָּה הַגִּבֹּרִים אֲשֶׁר מֵעוֹלָם, אַנְשֵׁי הַשֵּׁם. 4
The Nephilim were in the earth in those days, and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bore children to them; the same were the mighty men that were of old, the men of renown.
^
if Angels got women pregnant, it was like we read the Holy Spirit and Mary, because, you need Blood to pass Genetics in order to create life.

We disagree. The Holy Spirit involved in this evil act? No; surely not.

you disagree that the Holy Spirit overshadowed Mary, or, you think the Holy Spirit had sex with Mary?

i am saying the Holy Spirit overshadowed Mary.

i then think, if the Angels, got women pregnant, is by overshadowing the human women, not by having sex.

You misunderstand. Of course Mary was overshadowed by the Holy Spirit. This was God’s plan. However, the Holy Spirit would never be involved with fallen angels impregnating human women.