No major doctrines changed?

And those differences will also reveal DOCTRINAL differences.

And those differences will also reveal DOCTRINAL differences.

Truth matters when it comes to God and his word, yes? Wouldn't you agree? Even if it is a truth that you deem "minor"?

How many were appointed by the Lord and sent out? Seventy or seventy two? You may not think it is no big deal, but when the bible claims itself to be true, then all things therein must be true. A faithful witness cannot lie. Is the bible a faithful witness?

The KJV states seventy, and most all other modern versions gives seventy two. Which is the faithful witness?

Luke 10:1 After these things the Lord appointed other seventy also, and sent them two and two before his face into every city and place, whither he himself would come.

ESV Luke 10:1 After this the Lord appointed seventy-two others and sent them on ahead of him, two by two, into every town and place where he himself was about to go.

Just like anyone who has studied Latin in high school can understand the Vulgate.

smh...

There are MANY more texts available now, and newer translations take those into account. The KJV couldn't.

How does that even compare to a person who speaks, reads, writes English and studies Shakespeare?

A rather poor comparison, anyone who studied Latin in school, did not use Latin as their native tongue.

The KJV is not "incomprehensible in parts" as you stated, if English is the persons native tongue. We aren't talking about 12 year olds are we?

SMH

I read the Op and dont see a doctrinal change due to the wording differences.

What i have observed is that there are many kjvo who disagree doctrinally, and that under kjvo conditions and times many denominations have cropped up.

NIV was written (if i am not wrong) in 1973. And is the first critical text only English Bible. The ASB. NASB, AND RSV, are simply the KJV written in the "modern" English of the time. While the critical text is taken into concideration the differences between the the critical text and the recieved texts are simply italicized.

Not "many more" but simply "the Minority Text" to be found in the corrupt Critical Texts (such as Nestle, Nestle-Aland, UBS, etc. which are all essentially the same). And you should do your own personal research to discover the truth.

Shakespear invented many words, and phrases.
Also why should someone have to study a heathen inorder to be able to read the Bible?
Also contrary to popular opinion shakespear is aweful, the same ole rehashed stories in flambouyant wording to cover that they are the same tale yet again.
Also it would be much more useful to study Latin, and more useful still to study Greek. So why bother with something as useless a shakespearian plop.

If a person does not like Shakespeare that is fine, but that is not my point.

The English of the the KJV is not incomprehensible for an English speaking person who has finished high school. The language of the KJV has been shown to be at a grade 11 to 12th grade level.

is different enough from modern English that it is, in places, incomprehensible.

This is what you stated.

Let's put it this way there is no evidence to support this.

What makes text incomprehensible to someone is based on a lot of different factors not just how different it is from modern English.

So no not a logical fallacy, it is a broad sweeping claim with no evidence that is my main point.

If a person does not like Shakespeare that is fine, but that is not my point.

The English of the the KJV is not incomprehensible for an English speaking person who has finished high school. The language of the KJV has been shown to be at a grade 11 to 12th grade level.

Seems like @Dino246 didn't really have a response except "boring."

No evidence except the KJB itself.


"He that is surety for a stranger shall smart for it: and he that hateth suretiship is sure."

"He runneth upon him, even on his neck, upon the thick bosses of his bucklers: Because he covereth his face with his fatness, and maketh collops of fat on his flanks."

"And the unicorns shall come down with them, and the bullocks with the bulls; and their land shall be soaked with blood, and their dust made fat with fatness.

"O ye Corinthians, our mouth is open unto you, our heart is enlarged. Ye are not straitened in us, but ye are straitened in your own bowels. Now for a recompense in the same, (I speak as unto my children,) be ye also enlarged."

" And Elisha came again to Gilgal: and there was a dearth in the land; and the sons of the prophets were sitting before him: and he said unto his servant, Set on the great pot, and seethe pottage for the sons of the prophets."

"girt about the paps with a golden girdle"

" ...he that rebuketh a wicked man getteth himself a blot."

" the mantles, and the wimples, and the crisping pins,"

You can tell me what these words are:
Neesings,
Ague,
Besom,
Ossifrage,
Pygarg,
Almug,
Churl,
Hoarfrost,
Beeves,
Horseleach,
Helves,
And calves of lips.

You are not getting my point, its okay.

Have a good day, cold but the sun is shining here, so its all good.

I think this very well fits the point.
These are the types of words, that make reading the KJV difficult for mkdern readers.
Words that no one knows what they actually mean.
Its not thees and thous, it actually words that are so far out of use that the meaning is actually lost.

There are many people who know what these words mean, as well nothing is incomprehensible in the age of the internet.