Elon Responds to Alleged Attack on Pelosi Husband

i wish that folks would learn that just because someone says or does a " few good things" does not mean they are on our side.

if someone does not confess Christ as Lord, they are not.

It seems very strange to me that a hammer wielding nut job could get into that gated community, smash his way into the Pelosi house and begin beating this guy with a hammer. These are multi million dollar mansions with constant police presence, cameras everywhere , and it seems to me all these very wealthy homes like this would all have a "panic room". But let's not speculate, give us the video tape showing him busting in or else the evidence that Paul Pelosi brought him in his car.

I would think that if this story were false that both Nancy and Paul would respond forcefully and perhaps through their lawyers to Elon's tweet. In this case silence will speak volumes.

I'm also wondering if Nancy could possibly lose her election?

This is not acceptable!


Nancy Pelosi is the third most powerful person in the country and she doesn't even have an alarm system on her house! This nut job was able to break his way in from the back door without setting off an alarm! I am stunned that there is such lax security around the Pelosi house. Fire the Secret Service, fire whatever police are involved in her detail. How could they allow this? I would think the very first thing they would do when she became speaker so many years ago was to make sure her house had proper security.

i wish that folks would learn that just because someone says or does a " few good things" does not mean they are on our side.

if someone does not confess Christ as Lord, they are not.

That’s true, but these days Christians are so desperate, they’ll latch on to anything that walks like or talks like a duck.

Are you a Christian? If so then I assume you include yourself in your comment.

Impeccable logic Mr. Spock. Obviously, my statement was a general statement since I didn't say 'all Christians'.

Impeccable logic Mr. Spock. Obviously, my statement was a general statement since I didn't say 'all Christians'.

You did say all Christians. And you didn't confess to be one when I asked.

I did not say 'all' Christians (post #64); that's your addition. (I hope you don't handle Scripture the same way).
I was born again in '72. So yes, I am very much a Christian..

I'm glad to here you're Christian but whether you meant to or not you absolutely included all Christians in your statement. Perhaps in the future you will think twice before painting people with such a broad brush.
I also suggest you remove the log from your eye before you comment on how I may or may not handle scripture.

Which post number did I say ’all Christians’?

I will quote what you said "but these days Christians are so desperate". You didn't say some Christians, and in that context it could only mean all Christians. But hey if you want to continue to walk it back then that's your choice.

I will quote what you said "but these days Christians are so desperate". You didn't say some Christians, and in that context it could only mean all Christians. But hey if you want to continue to walk it back then that's your choice.

When I read that It seems implied that he wasn't including himself, since he considers himself a Christian I think it is fair to say that he didn't mean all Christians, he only meant everyone except for himself.

Do you add words to Scripture as well when you read it? I failed to see the word ‘all’. You just added ‘all’ in your interpretation.

My thoughts exactly.


Well Einstein I failed to see you use the word few or some or anything else that would differentiate your statement from meaning all Christians.
But I tire of this game, so I will be moving on and you can have the last word.

I was just listening to a podcast yesterday when they were talking about this. This guy is Q Anon has a long history of doing crazy stuff
I don't know if that state has castle doctrine but there's a way to deal with Intruders in your home
A permanent way