Romans 8:3–4 (NASB95)
3 "For what the Law could not do, weak as it was through the flesh, God did: sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and as an offering for sin, He condemned sin in the flesh,
4 so that the requirement of the Law might be fulfilled in us, who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit."
1 Timothy 1:9–10 (NASB95)
9 "Realizing the fact that law is not made for a righteous person, but for those who are lawless and rebellious, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers
10 and immoral men and homosexuals and kidnappers and liars and perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound teaching."
Based on these scriptures, the requirements of the LAW are still expected to be fulfilled which would apply to both believers and non-believers (to all peoples) with the exception that believers have fulfilled the requirements of the law by proxy, that is, they have placed their faith in the Lord who fulfilled the Law FOR them and AS them (as covenantal representative).
For unbelievers, the requirement is the same which would indicate that God judges the world according to His moral law (the Ten Commandments) that is revealed first through their conscience (knowing the difference between right from wrong) which at the same time, should cause them to recognize that they need help from God because, in themselves, they cannot do it.
However, when unbelievers take a step further and ridicule the preaching (or the sharing) of the gospel (good news of what God has done through Christ) and right out reject it, they are condemning themselves because they are responsible before God to fulfill the law perfectly or be condemned.
Should we then believe that preaching the law to unbelievers is correct because it exposes their guilt and hypocrisy, or should we share the grace of God that draws them to the Lord? Which of the two methods is most effective? *
*This thread is intended to engage in healthy discussions. 🤠
.
3 "For what the Law could not do, weak as it was through the flesh, God did: sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and as an offering for sin, He condemned sin in the flesh,
4 so that the requirement of the Law might be fulfilled in us, who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit."
1 Timothy 1:9–10 (NASB95)
9 "Realizing the fact that law is not made for a righteous person, but for those who are lawless and rebellious, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers
10 and immoral men and homosexuals and kidnappers and liars and perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound teaching."
Based on these scriptures, the requirements of the LAW are still expected to be fulfilled which would apply to both believers and non-believers (to all peoples) with the exception that believers have fulfilled the requirements of the law by proxy, that is, they have placed their faith in the Lord who fulfilled the Law FOR them and AS them (as covenantal representative).
For unbelievers, the requirement is the same which would indicate that God judges the world according to His moral law (the Ten Commandments) that is revealed first through their conscience (knowing the difference between right from wrong) which at the same time, should cause them to recognize that they need help from God because, in themselves, they cannot do it.
However, when unbelievers take a step further and ridicule the preaching (or the sharing) of the gospel (good news of what God has done through Christ) and right out reject it, they are condemning themselves because they are responsible before God to fulfill the law perfectly or be condemned.
Should we then believe that preaching the law to unbelievers is correct because it exposes their guilt and hypocrisy, or should we share the grace of God that draws them to the Lord? Which of the two methods is most effective? *
*This thread is intended to engage in healthy discussions. 🤠
.