What is Biblical marriage?

It has been a curiosity to me for a long time as to why there are no specific directions for how to get married in the Bible. Marriage permeates our daily life and the fabric of our cultures and society yet the Bible is curiously silent on the topic.

Marriages are mentioned in the Bible, but are there any examples of vows, ceremony, documents, etc. Why?

Today I had a thought about this verse:

Matthew 5:28
28But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.

So if a man or woman looks at someone to lust after them then they have committed adultery with them in their heart.

By process of reverse engineering Matt. 5:28, the implication is that if adultery occurs in the heart then marriage occurs in the heart, too.

Does this explain why there is no clearcut criteria for marriage in the Bible? We just need to look a little deeper and read between the lines a bit.

I believe that it seems logical to me that true marriage occurs in the heart. A document and ceremony doesn't validate a marriage. As we know there are plenty of loveless sham marriages.

So what are your thoughts/opinions/debates/rebukes/etc? Thank you for taking the time to read this.

Naomi gave Ruth specific instructions on how to get married.

Getting married is easy. The details are in how to stay married.

He took after his dad in that regards.

Two becoming one flesh, man and woman. A ceremony of vows does not make one married in the eyes of God.

Two becoming one flesh is a the most concise illustration of a biblical marriage.

So, what is two becoming one flesh? Do you mean to say that only physical intimacy validates a marriage?

Biblically speaking, yes. See the story of Jacob, Leah, and Rachel.

It seems like the first person who has someone's heart is their husband or wife or it would be impossible to commit adultery in their heart. That's how it makes sense to me.

Solomon's first love was his wife. Everyone he lusted after, thereafter, while she remained alive, was an affair. Does that make sense?

That makes sense, but they aren't connected as one flesh like a conjoined twin is. So is there a double meaning to "become one flesh?"

Of course, there is typically a physical application in Scripture and a spiritual.

The sexual act surpasses just emotion, hormones, or design, it is connected to the conscience and soul. As to why casual sex or non-monogamous relationships are a fools playground. If sex carried no higher feelings than just reproduction then rape wouldn't be so devastating.

One flesh shares the truth that now like it or not you are connected in a good or bad way to that individual in memory, feelings, or sometimes disease with STDs.

In the context of marriage one flesh means, well, one not two. Obviously now you act as one and love as one. You love each other how you would want to be loved.

Casual sex is centered in selfish desire to gain the satisfaction of sex without the commitment to oneness. That rebellion has caused broken families for millenniums.

Idk what you guys are on about... if make marriage vows before witnesses and before God- how is that "not marriage"? That's absolutely a binding covenant.
Once you're married, it's actually your responsibility to live as one flesh with the person you marry, but that's not how you get married.

There's been many kinds of marriage agreements, either between the Groom and father of the bride- or with the bride herself... there is no marriage without some kind of agreement and there should definitely be witnesses.

Marriage is not just "in your heart" It's completely incomparable and not likened to an adulterous fantasy in any way, shape or form.

I don't think it's as simple as that though. Does God actually recognize vows and oaths as valid? Jesus said to just say "yes" or "no" and that anything more than a simple yes or no comes from evil. Where in the New Testament is there any teaching to make wedding vows?

It's just that, marriage vows. It's not actually the marriage itself. Biblically, the marriage takes place when two become one flesh.

Seems to be the case, the marriage is not really official until it is consummated in an act of physical intimacy. In most states, if there is no consummation there are grounds for an annulment.

I believe that God only recognizes that which He has joined together with mutual consent of the man and the woman. Vows are binding too so it is best to give serious consideration before entering into an actual vow. The way that I look at it, I would not enter into marriage with a woman who is tentative about the marriage in the first place. It is called lack of commitment.

So, Jesus' teaching on oaths is more complicated than what it looks like. I'm not a language expert, but from my understanding it's a translation issue- Jesus is talking about not using oaths in informal speech. Jesus himself answers when put under oath by the High Priest, and Paul saying stuff like "I speak the truth in Christ. I am not lying. My conscience testifies for me in the Holy Spirit" - He could have gotten his point across without saying all those words- but this is a formal church epistle, so it's not inappropriate. If Paul was discussing something less meaningful (I saw a fox chasing a squirrel this morning- I am not lying, my conscience testifies for me in the Holy spirit), it would be inappropriate to bring the Holy Ghost into the affirmation of that statement.

When asked about principles of marriage, Jesus answes "have you not read...?" and says "from the beginning". Marriage was going on before the Law, so, really, the advent of the NT doesn't have much impact. (The most impact is against polygamy, and divorce, but even then Jesus explained that those things were not what marriage was intended to be from the beginning.)
"wedding vows" is essentially a man and woman agreeing to marriage terms, because these days men don't have the power to give their daughters in marriage anymore- although Christians, if they are trying to marry a Christian woman with a Christian family- are much better off marrying with the approval of the father of the bride... If he is in the picture.

What the State has to say about marriage is irrelevant if it is contradictory to the word of God, and these days, you can pretty much ignore what the State thinks about marriage. At least in the United States.

I can't agree with that interpretation because the Bible doesn't define what constitutes informal or formal speech. That would leave it up to the individual to create their own standard of what is formal or informal. That essentially means there is no right or wrong speech because it's an opinion. I don't want to be disagreeable, but it's an opinion that it isn't necessary to bring the Holy Ghost into mundane topics about squirrels.

My view is simply hang your hat on Matthew 5:34 But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is God's throne:

Amen. I pretty much agree with all of this part.