Ok
I am "all for" telling people the truth about the VAX - warning them of the dangers; however, I also believe in doing so only with truth. I don't believe in "making something up" in an effort to "obtain the desired result" - even with the best intentions.
I question the validity of this video.
I know for a fact that nothing "goes in" as a clear liquid and "becomes" a microchip. That would be an impossible feat.
A lot of detail-precision equipment is required to produce a working microchip of any size.
What he said about using the same bar-code and QR-code reader to scan the 'microchip' - that has to be balony - as far as I am aware, the hardware involved is strictly optical.
Also - why did he not scan the 'microchip' with his scanner at the end of the video?
Now, I am not going to say that the "clear liquid going in" could not become something after being injected - affected by heat, blood, whatever - but, it would be a chemical process - not something "built" by 'nanobots'.
I question the real extent of the capability of 'nanotechnology'. For the most part, I believe it is nothing more than a propaganda tool.
The real actual dangers of the VAX exist in the realm of bio-chemistry.
And, that is plenty enough.
Gary,
Thanks for the comment. You make a good point about the gentleman not scanning the ‘microchip’ with his scanner at the end of the video. I don’t believe in “making something up” to “obtain the desired result” either. I’m still learning and reading about all these various technologies. This video was posted by a brother who has given sound biblical teachings on youtube for years. I think I may have been too trusting of him.
I do think it is very possible that this microchip component will be part of the final mark of the beast once it is complete. My apologies to my brothers and sisters for posting this video without mentioning the questionable aspects of it.
I recently read about the process of “straintronics.” Earlier this year, researchers engaged in a process where they have created kinks in the structure of graphene. This caused the nanomaterial to behave like a transistor or microchip. Although this is a different process than what was shown, apparently graphemes can be manipulated to produce microchip/transistor like properties.
Yes, the biochemical aspects of the vaccine/gene therapy shots give sufficient reason for alarm.
I also believe there is good reason to be concerned about nanotechnology that can act as biosensors. These quantum dots present in the vaccines could be activated by an electromagnetic signal. These computational biosensors within the cells could send/receive signals with a quantum computing network.
The biosensor notes the status of a gene, and that status could then be related to a quantum computer. Thus, the chemistry of the brain and/or other systems of the body could be changed when a signal is received by a quantum computer. AI uses pattern recognition in the form digitizing of genes (0’s and 1’s) or on/off that combine into an algorithm that can be recognized and understood by AI.