PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE GET THE COVID SHOT.

There is no fruit in going back and forth with you. I will post the accompanying article and people can make up their own minds.

Caught Red-Handed: CDC Changes Test Thresholds To Virtually Eliminate New COVID Cases Among Vaxx'd

SUNDAY, MAY 23, 2021 - 09:45 AM
Authored by Kit Knightly via Off-Guardian.org,
New policies will artificially deflate “breakthrough infections” in the vaccinated, while the old rules continue to inflate case numbers in the unvaccinated.

The US Center for Disease Control (CDC) is altering its practices of data logging and testing for “Covid19” in order to make it seem the experimental gene-therapy “vaccines” are effective at preventing the alleged disease.
They made no secret of this, announcing the policy changes on their website in late April/early May, (though naturally without admitting the fairly obvious motivation behind the change).
The trick is in their reporting of what they call “breakthrough infections” – that is people who are fully “vaccinated” against Sars-Cov-2 infection, but get infected anyway.
Essentially, Covid19 has long been shown – to those willing to pay attention – to be an entirely created pandemic narrative built on two key factors:

1. False-positive tests. The unreliable PCR test can be manipulated into reporting a high number of false-positives by altering the cycle threshold (CT value)
2. Inflated Case-count. The incredibly broad definition of “Covid case”, used all over the world, lists anyone who receives a positive test as a “Covid19 case”, even if they never experienced any symptoms.

Without these two policies, there would never have been an appreciable pandemic at all, and now the CDC has enacted two policy changes which means they no longer apply to vaccinated people.
Firstly, they are lowering their CT value when testing samples from suspected “breakthrough infections”.

From the CDC’s instructions for state health authorities on handling “possible breakthrough infections” (uploaded to their website in late April):


Throughout the pandemic, CT values in excess of 35 have been the norm, with labs around the world going into the 40s.

Essentially labs were running as many cycles as necessary to achieve a positive result, despite experts warning that this was pointless (even Fauci himself said anything over 35 cycles is meaningless).

But NOW, and only for fully vaccinated people, the CDC will only accept samples achieved from 28 cycles or fewer. That can only be a deliberate decision in order to decrease the number of “breakthrough infections” being officially recorded.


Secondly, asymptomatic or mild infections will no longer be recorded as “covid cases”.

That’s right. Even if a sample collected at the low CT value of 28 can be sequenced into the virus alleged to cause Covid19, the CDC will no longer be keeping records of breakthrough infections that don’t result in hospitalisation or death.

From their website:

Just like that, being asymptomatic – or having only minor symptoms – will no longer count as a “Covid case” but only if you’ve been vaccinated.

The CDC has put new policies in place which effectively created a tiered system of diagnosis. Meaning, from now on, unvaccinated people will find it much easier to be diagnosed with Covid19 than vaccinated people.

Consider…

The CDC is demonstrating the beauty of having a “disease” that can appear or disappear depending on how you measure it.

To be clear: If these new policies had been the global approach to “Covid” since December 2019, there would never have been a pandemic at all.

If you apply them only to the vaccinated, but keep the old rules for the unvaccinated, the only possible result can be that the official records show “Covid” is much more prevalent among the latter than the former.

This is a policy designed to continuously inflate one number, and systematically minimise the other.
What is that if not an obvious and deliberate act of deception?

You were told that Revelation 3:10 is pre-trib rapture.
That is contradicting the very scripture itself by adding to it what Jesus did not say = Perfect example.
Do a study on the word 'kept' in the New Testament.
Saying that 'kept' means 'rapture' is twisting, changing and adding.

We should poll people who have had the vaccine. If the 62% is accurate we should see 2/3 of people having issues with shortness of breath and hypertension. The blood clots can also cause issues with your brain and nervous system.

Debunked

PCR tests on vaccinated and unvaccinated people are evaluated using the same criteria; the CDC didn’t change criteria for detecting infection in vaccinated people, as alleged in OffGuardian article

I try to put my finger on the pulse of what's prophetically possible from a word of God, Bible standpoint. Not claiming everything I would muse upon would be correct....but I do have to go with as one said here a gut feeling.

I am a NYC teacher. I was in a union meeting where we were told the union is basically split, half are vaccinated and half aren't. This is why they are not mandating the vaccine for teachers (it would be a catastrophe if half left). However, what they are doing is only testing unvaccinated people. Now even if you have a public school education you should be able to understand that if we only test unvaccinated people on a weekly basis we will identify much more "positive cases" among unvaccinated. The only time a vaccinated person would get tested is if they got so sick they had to go to the hospital.

Therefore, if you wanted to do a truly "apples to apples" comparison you would only be talking about those in the hospital testing positive.

Fascists continue their blitzkrieg in Australia:

Nordlund told AP that “CDC and state health departments will be focusing only on investigating vaccine breakthrough cases that result in hospitalization or death […] Every breakthrough case of COVID will still be reported. We just won’t call it out in a certain place on the website”.

The website also explains that the CDC is recording vaccine breakthrough cases in a separate database for the time being:

As demonstrated above, the article once again misinterpreted the CDC’s statements. The citation it used to support the claim explained that only fatal or hospitalized cases would be monitored and investigated further. However, this doesn’t mean that mild or asymptomatic cases aren’t reported. As stated above, COVID-19 is a reportable disease by law, therefore all cases need to be reported, regardless of the severity or vaccination status. But only reported cases that are severe are monitored and investigated.


COVID-19 vaccines are highly effective at preventing severe COVID-19 and death; they aren’t “experimental gene therapy”
The article claimed that the CDC was moving the goalposts for PCR testing in order to make it seem as if “the experimental gene-therapy ‘vaccines’ are effective at preventing” COVID-19.

This claim is inaccurate and poorly reasoned. Firstly, scientists already had a pool of evidence demonstrating that the COVID-19 vaccines are effective at preventing disease, predating the alleged change in PCR cycle thresholds in May 2021.

This evidence comes from the clinical trials examining the COVID-19 vaccines authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which demonstrated that the vaccines are highly effective at preventing severe COVID-19. In November 2020, Pfizer and BioNTech reported that the vaccine has 95% efficacy at preventing symptomatic COVID-19, while Moderna reported 94% efficacy. Johnson and Johnson reported that their vaccine has 85% efficacy at preventing severe illness.

In addition, real-world evidence from ongoing vaccination campaigns, also predating the alleged change, demonstrated that the vaccines are highly effective at protecting people from severe disease and death, as seen in this CDC study on the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna RNA vaccines, conducted between December 2020 and April 2021[1], as well as this study in Israel conducted between January and April 2021, published in The Lancet[2].


In other words, there was already reliable evidence showing that the vaccines are effective, without having to resort to the alleged change in PCR test methodology. Had the vaccines not worked, this would have been evident during clinical trials and the vaccines wouldn’t have received emergency use authorization by the FDA.

Thirdly, COVID-19 vaccines are neither “experimental” nor “gene therapy”. Their effectiveness and safety was demonstrated during clinical trials before being released to the public. Gene therapy involves the modification of a person’s genes to treat disease. COVID-19 vaccines cannot modify DNA, as previously explained by Health Feedback, thus disqualifying them as “gene therapy”.

PCR tests detect infection, but not necessarily contagiousness; most positive tests are true positives
The article brought up inaccurate and misleading claims dating back last year to at least November 2020, specifically that the COVID-19 PCR test is overly sensitive and inflates the number of COVID-19 cases. These claims were reviewed by Health Feedback and found to be inaccurate (see here and here).

As explained in our previous reviews, the claim is based on a misinterpretation of scientists’ statements, including that of the director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Anthony Fauci. The scientists discussed concerns about the issue of positive PCR tests with high Ct values, namely that many people with such results may no longer be infectious.

This issue calls into question whether PCR tests are a practical way of informing a person infected with COVID-19 of what steps they should take after their diagnosis, specifically whether they should self-isolate. This consideration is also relevant to helping public health authorities determine whether contact tracing for that individual is needed.

However, some wrongly took these concerns to mean that PCR tests produce many false-positive results. Whether one has a high or low Ct determines whether contact tracing and self-isolation measures would be useful. This is because high viral load (low Ct value) likely indicates that a person is infectious, whereas a low viral load (high Ct value) likely indicates that a person is not infectious or has low transmissibility.

However, being infected isn’t the same as being contagious. It is inaccurate to label high Ct positive results as “false positives”. The term “false positive” indicates that a person tested positive but doesn’t have the infection[3]. However, a person is or has been infected if they test positive, regardless of whether the test had a high or low Ct value. This also means that a person with a positive result and high Ct value would correctly be classified as a COVID-19 case.

The sensitivity of the PCR test is not responsible for the high number of COVID-19 cases worldwide, which led to the declaration of a pandemic. Simply put, the detected number of COVID-19 cases are high because there are many infected people. The claim fails to distinguish between the test’s ability to confirm an infection—which is what case numbers measure—with the test’s ability to determine contagiousness.

Proverbs 18 comes to mind.

I am a NYC teacher. I was in a union meeting where we were told the union is basically split, half are vaccinated and half aren't.

However, what they are doing is only testing unvaccinated people. Now even if you have a public school education you should be able to understand that if we only test unvaccinated people on a weekly basis we will identify much more "positive cases" among unvaccinated. The only time a vaccinated person would get tested is if they got so sick they had to go to the hospital.

Now I do find that interesting. You're a teacher and half your union membership don't want vaccinated? Seems like the media is wanting to say everybody, everybody is getting it and only the less informed less educated individuals are declining. And yet you and your fellow teachers are educated and it doesn't seem like an uniformed crowd. Not that the ones vaccinated I'm criticizing as uniformed but not wanting to be vaccinated can still be in the realm of basic reasonable thought. Educated people are having reservations it's not just a bunch of yahoos that the powers which be try to portray them to be.

And one question is how often is one supposed to submit to tests. I've heard maybe twice a week in some places AND possibly at the employees own expense. Look if that's what it all means being tested twice a week at one's own expense that really in effect is mandating the vaccine. Who could really sustain getting that done forever not to mention how I'd effect one psychologically
having to submit to such a thing.

The job ahead for managers: Enforcing new rules for unvaccinated employees at work - CNN

You take life way too seriously if that bothers you.

You were told that Revelation 3:10 is pre-trib rapture.
That is contradicting the very scripture itself by adding to it what Jesus did not say = Perfect example.
Do a study on the word 'kept' in the New Testament.
Saying that 'kept' means 'rapture' is twisting, changing and adding.

apparently, and I heard this from my vet, people have killed their dogs by dosing them with ivermectin meant for horses

a friend of ours has been able to order ivermectin and we intend to follow suit.. still taking the c and all the other stuff...

They will most likely push harder to mandate the vaccine once it's FDA approved.