A lot of people have asked why Jesus was crucified by the Romans rather than stoned by the Jews. After all, He, according to the Jewish leaders, had committed blasphemy by claiming to be God. In the Old Testament, the prescribed penalty for blasphemy was stoning.
There's also the issue of whether the Romans reserved ALL capital punishment for themselves, or if they sometimes granted the Jews permission to carry out CP against convicted offenders of their own people. In John 18, the Jewish leaders told Pilate that it was unlawful for them to put anyone to death. This was after Pilate has told them to take Jesus and judge Him by their law. Now, whether the Romans in fact forbade the Jews during that time from executing anyone or if the Jews had a limited allowance to do so is up for debate. It's hard to say whether they lied to Pilate or told him the truth when they said they weren't allowed to put anyone to death.
In addition, the Scriptures say in both Deuteronomy 21 and Galatians 3 that anyone who is hung on a tree is "cursed by God".
I believe that (aside from God's plan and other theological reasons), the Jews really wanted Jesus to be crucified rather than stoned. They hated Him so much that they felt He deserved to be hung on a tree and thus "cursed by God". On the other hand, when someone was stoned, that person was justly punished for breaking the specific law that prescribed the death penalty. However, that doesn't mean that the offender was necessarily cursed.
Of course, there's also the matter of Jesus shedding His blood for sin. A stoning wouldn't have accomplished that.
To be sure, Jesus was almost stoned at least once (John 8), but His time had not yet come.
I'm not questioning the fact that Jesus had to be crucified; I just like to dig into the theological and human reasons for it. To better understand the interplay between God's plans and human decisions/events.
$0.02
There's also the issue of whether the Romans reserved ALL capital punishment for themselves, or if they sometimes granted the Jews permission to carry out CP against convicted offenders of their own people. In John 18, the Jewish leaders told Pilate that it was unlawful for them to put anyone to death. This was after Pilate has told them to take Jesus and judge Him by their law. Now, whether the Romans in fact forbade the Jews during that time from executing anyone or if the Jews had a limited allowance to do so is up for debate. It's hard to say whether they lied to Pilate or told him the truth when they said they weren't allowed to put anyone to death.
In addition, the Scriptures say in both Deuteronomy 21 and Galatians 3 that anyone who is hung on a tree is "cursed by God".
I believe that (aside from God's plan and other theological reasons), the Jews really wanted Jesus to be crucified rather than stoned. They hated Him so much that they felt He deserved to be hung on a tree and thus "cursed by God". On the other hand, when someone was stoned, that person was justly punished for breaking the specific law that prescribed the death penalty. However, that doesn't mean that the offender was necessarily cursed.
Of course, there's also the matter of Jesus shedding His blood for sin. A stoning wouldn't have accomplished that.
To be sure, Jesus was almost stoned at least once (John 8), but His time had not yet come.
I'm not questioning the fact that Jesus had to be crucified; I just like to dig into the theological and human reasons for it. To better understand the interplay between God's plans and human decisions/events.
$0.02
- 1
- Show all