New York Times Stalking Fox's Tucker Carlson, Posting Home Address And Harassment?

Washington Examiner

Tucker Carlson accuses New York Times of endangering his family with forthcoming story

July 20, 2020 - 9:23 PM

Fox News host Tucker Carlson said the New York Times will put his family in danger by publishing a story about where he lives.
Carlson said during his Monday show that the decision to include information about the location of his home in the forthcoming story is politically motivated and claimed the New York Times "hates [his] politics."

"They hate my politics," he said. "They want this show off the air. If one of my children gets hurt because of a story they wrote, they won't consider it collateral damage. They know it's the whole point of the exercise to inflict pain on our family, to terrorize us, to control what we say. That's the kind of people they are."

Carlson said he became aware that the New York Times was working on a story about where he and his family live. He said there was "no conceivable justification" for the story and that it doesn't detail any wrongdoing or a scandalous tiff with a neighbor.

Like in the discussion, this cannot be allowed to continue, reporting about a district attorney backed by the anti-America billionaire George Soros, so too is the New York Times something he backs. He uses people he gives money to as a weapon to further his agenda against America and the Republicans he targets for destruction.

I think we should hold Tucker Carlson in our prayers for sure. And pray he has a huge security team to protect him from the evil of ANTIFA and BLM. ANTIFA is another Soros weapon. BLM is Muslim Brotherhood. Not a good combination to have teamed together in America.

And the Liberal politicians that want to defund police in the midst of the chaos going on and while allowing the chaos makers to proceed unencumbered by the laws are the same folk who want to take our guns.
It's easier to overcome victims when the victims can't fight back.

Are We Getting A Taste Of What Socialism is like ?

I once again watched Tucker Carlson on Friday night. NYC along cities in CA.are now telling people of whom want to go to a bar they are NO LONGER ALLOWED to eat the dollar chips offered (since previously they were not allowed to drink only (NY) they had to also eat. The establishments came up with a creative idea: Serve chips with their beverage the cost being a dollar for the chips.

Tucker reported this: CHIPS ARE NO LONGER ALLOWED !!!! Individuals are no longer allowed to have (with their beverage) cheese sticks, chicken wings and calamari and of course the inexpensive chips. PLUS: Tacos yes, rolled tacos no, chicken breasts yes chicken wings no. Note: previously these items were allowed.

I think CA. has a law that if you are drinking you must also eat something. I can go along with that its just the above I have difficulty with. Tacos yes but rolled tacos no to include but not limited to the chicken mandate etc. Tucker's statement " Since the virus, states have a lot more power then they use to have and, once again they are using it. NY and CA. are now using this power to police restaurant menus, what is allowed and what is not allowed." It appears the states are now allowed to tell people who live there what they can and cannot eat. Eating a bowl of soup is ok it will keep an individual sober, really ????? Leaves me to wonder what's next ?

I will be the first one to admit I am possibly over-reacting yet this really bothered me.

Yours is a really good question. Are we getting a taste of socialism. The Democratic lawmakers for sure support Marxism and Socialism. Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio Cortez being two of the most vocal to that end that I can recall.

What I can't figure out is why Democrat leaders, Mayors and Governors, would threaten police at the federal level who want to stop domestic terrorists acting out in those cities we read about. Portland, Seattle, and others. While the law abiding are being threatened if they resist the terrorists acting out upon them.

Isn't enabling domestic terrorists as an elected leader an act of treason?

And the allowance issues, like you mention. People not allowed, people allowed to this or that, with limits. It does sound like Communism actually.

Like the Supremes recent decision against a church that wanted to open to allow parishioners to enter in full capacity. Justice Roberts was the swing vote and he sided with allowing casinos and theaters to open to capacity while limiting churches to 50 people.
Where's the reasoning in that? There is none! Casinos and theaters have more rights than an institution protected under the inalienable right written out in the first amendment?

The churches don't have to follow the orders of that court. The supreme court cannot amend the constitution. But their opinion says a lot about how far they've fallen. In God we trust must have skipped their minds.

I agree 100% Roberts is "Scary" in his recent decisions

Casinos, Theatres, having precedent over religious liberty?

Yes the Democrat Governor's, Mayor's, and Congress, are supporting (Domestic Terrorist) in Antifa, and Violent protesters, yes these are acts of treason as defined by the constitution.

These are times never seen before in history in the US as I'm aware of?

I believe AG Barr openly classifying Antifa as a Terrorist as a domestic Terrorist group will see enforcement in the near future.

The demonstrations in Chicago started out peacefully, as they moved closer to the park and statue are they assembled with umbrellas, trying to cover while changing into black clothes, as weapons in rocks, bottles, cans, etc were distributed

Several police officers were injured, it's been recorded that many of these violent Terrorist are traveling around the country, assisting in various states.

Absolutely organized domestic (Terroism)

Police have been injured by lasers used and aimed at their eyes! And Mayors and even a DA claim these actions by these domestic terrorists are acts of free speech? In what world? Then one DA, their name I don't recall now, claimed federal police sent to these areas where domestic terrorists are active are kidnapping people! And he will prosecute them. When did arresting criminals become labeled, kidnapping?

Did someone put something in the water in these major cities so that the officials there lose their mind? Sponsoring domestic terrorism while threatening their victims and federal law enforcement to stand down and let it happen?

Am I in a coma somewhere and this is all just a nightmare in my unconscious state?

Speaking of NYT, anyone read the resignation letter of Bari Weiss? Outstanding! Highly recommend.
https://www.bariweiss.com/resignation-letter