Mark of the Beast PRECONDITIONING National Lockdown /Chip Implant (666 Resistance Prayer)
- Thread starter SpiritDove05
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
What you said above is true for those who will be on the earth during that time. However, the church won't be here to have to make that choice and that because the mark will become the only way of buying and selling during the time of God's wrath, which believers are not appointed to suffer.
-
3
-
1
- Show all
What about the "Real ID"? The federally compliant drivers license/ID card that allows a person to board flights, enter federal buildings and other federal facilities? Deadline for getting one is October 1, 2020. Real-ID Department Homeland Security
That sounds like the national ID card that was spoken of shortly after 9-11.
I'd wonder if it has a tracking chip installed.
That sounds like the national ID card that was spoken of shortly after 9-11.
I'd wonder if it has a tracking chip installed.
Only the ones who die before those days come.
Watch ye therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of man (Luke 21:36).
It won't be "forced" on these:
And I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus (believers in Christ that you said would not be around for the mark), and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years...This is the first resurrection (Revelation 20:4-5).
The first resurrection is described further by Paul:
For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven...and the dead in Christ shall rise first: Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with him in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air (1 Thessalonians 4:16-17).
I respectfully disagree with you.
I agree with the plain teaching of the scriptures.
Watch ye therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of man (Luke 21:36).
It won't be "forced" on these:
And I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus (believers in Christ that you said would not be around for the mark), and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years...This is the first resurrection (Revelation 20:4-5).
The first resurrection is described further by Paul:
For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven...and the dead in Christ shall rise first: Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with him in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air (1 Thessalonians 4:16-17).
I respectfully disagree with you.
I agree with the plain teaching of the scriptures.
-
1
- Show all
Your example supports my position. Notice "accounted worthy to escape all these things." The escape will be the Lord appearing and removing His church from the earth. Since the wrath of God will come upon the whole world, there would be no place to escape to while being here.
Those above that you quoted under the alter at the opening of the 5th seal, will be those who die during the first 3 1/2 years, which prior to the mark becoming mandatory. Not only that, but you have misapplied scripture with those under the alter vs the great tribulation saints, who will be killed during the last 3 1/2 years.
The first resurrection is made up of phases or stages, as follows:
* Jesus the first fruits of the first resurrection
* The church at the Lord's appearing
* The male child/144,000 (caught up)
* The two witnesses
* The great tribulation saints
All of the above belong to the first resurrection. The error that people make, is that they interpret the word "first" as meaning "only" making it the only resurrection.
The church is the next phase of the first resurrection, with the male child and two witnesses being resurrected and caught up in the middle of the seven years and with the great tribulation saints who died being resurrected after Jesus returns to the earth to end the age.
These are all apart of the first resurrection. It's just that the "first resurrection" is only used to describe the resurrection of the great tribulation saints and so people automatically think that this is the only resurrection that takes place, which is false.
The resurrection of the dead and the living being changed and caught up, is referring to the church being caught up. Where Rev.20:4-6 is in reference to the resurrection of the great tribulation saints which takes place after the Lord returns to the earth to end the age. Both of these resurrections, one taking place prior to God's wrath and the other taking place after God's wrath, belong to the first resurrection.
Those above that you quoted under the alter at the opening of the 5th seal, will be those who die during the first 3 1/2 years, which prior to the mark becoming mandatory. Not only that, but you have misapplied scripture with those under the alter vs the great tribulation saints, who will be killed during the last 3 1/2 years.
The first resurrection is made up of phases or stages, as follows:
* Jesus the first fruits of the first resurrection
* The church at the Lord's appearing
* The male child/144,000 (caught up)
* The two witnesses
* The great tribulation saints
All of the above belong to the first resurrection. The error that people make, is that they interpret the word "first" as meaning "only" making it the only resurrection.
The church is the next phase of the first resurrection, with the male child and two witnesses being resurrected and caught up in the middle of the seven years and with the great tribulation saints who died being resurrected after Jesus returns to the earth to end the age.
These are all apart of the first resurrection. It's just that the "first resurrection" is only used to describe the resurrection of the great tribulation saints and so people automatically think that this is the only resurrection that takes place, which is false.
The resurrection of the dead and the living being changed and caught up, is referring to the church being caught up. Where Rev.20:4-6 is in reference to the resurrection of the great tribulation saints which takes place after the Lord returns to the earth to end the age. Both of these resurrections, one taking place prior to God's wrath and the other taking place after God's wrath, belong to the first resurrection.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
https://biblehub.com/kjv/1_thessalonians/4-15.htm not before...
Ahwatukee,
All I can say is that the book of Revelation does not present everything in a strict sequence of order. So when I see a marker like "this is the first resurrection" I am forced to look at all other events in light of this clear revelation. We see where John is seeing certain events, then suddenly he's in the spirit and see's a detailed description of an event prior to, and/or after, the narrative. For example, in chapter 11 at verse 15 the seventh angel has sounded his trumpet. Then on the very next chapter (12) he describes the appearance of a great wonder in heaven talking about the woman clothed with the sun, and so on (events of the past described in a parable, if you will).
I don't see any evidence for a multiple phased "first resurrection" in scripture. The resurrection clearly alluded to by Paul is the first resurrection mentioned in Revelation 20:5. Christ was already resurrected and the resurrection of those who got the victory over the beast is referred to as the "first" resurrection, even after the two witnesses are already taken to heaven in Revelation 11:3. So we can see that scripture did not take into consideration the taking up of the two witnesses; otherwise it would have told us at Revelations 20:5, this is the second resurrection (or third, if you want to count Christ's resurrection as well).
All I can say is that the book of Revelation does not present everything in a strict sequence of order. So when I see a marker like "this is the first resurrection" I am forced to look at all other events in light of this clear revelation. We see where John is seeing certain events, then suddenly he's in the spirit and see's a detailed description of an event prior to, and/or after, the narrative. For example, in chapter 11 at verse 15 the seventh angel has sounded his trumpet. Then on the very next chapter (12) he describes the appearance of a great wonder in heaven talking about the woman clothed with the sun, and so on (events of the past described in a parable, if you will).
I don't see any evidence for a multiple phased "first resurrection" in scripture. The resurrection clearly alluded to by Paul is the first resurrection mentioned in Revelation 20:5. Christ was already resurrected and the resurrection of those who got the victory over the beast is referred to as the "first" resurrection, even after the two witnesses are already taken to heaven in Revelation 11:3. So we can see that scripture did not take into consideration the taking up of the two witnesses; otherwise it would have told us at Revelations 20:5, this is the second resurrection (or third, if you want to count Christ's resurrection as well).
You will know what you are about to take is against the Most High.
So many declare they make a pact with the devil.
If you want to be part of the peace and safety world they propose then you will most probably take an oath or renounce your Faith in return for a place in the New world.
Those not willing will not be able to buy and sell.. which eventually will catch up with all men even the off grid folk.
For the control they have is capable of such oppression.
So many will do anything to live but the Faithful will not renounce their Faith in the Most High!
Peace and love.
So many declare they make a pact with the devil.
If you want to be part of the peace and safety world they propose then you will most probably take an oath or renounce your Faith in return for a place in the New world.
Those not willing will not be able to buy and sell.. which eventually will catch up with all men even the off grid folk.
For the control they have is capable of such oppression.
So many will do anything to live but the Faithful will not renounce their Faith in the Most High!
Peace and love.
I believe It Will happen after ww3.
I Remember Hegelian doctrine.
Problem reaction solution
Pope Will create problem, make big war
This is a link that tell jesuit help create ww1 and ww2
http://www.remnantofgod.org/jeswar.htm
After big war, people cry for peace
Than pope offer solution, If you want peace let make one world government.
I believe we have to start prepare spiritualy, I believe in post tribulation rapture
Doctrine Pretrib create by jesuit aswell.
https://www.talkjesus.com/threads/p...e-a-lie-created-by-the-jesuits-of-rome.53942/
I Remember Hegelian doctrine.
Problem reaction solution
Pope Will create problem, make big war
This is a link that tell jesuit help create ww1 and ww2
http://www.remnantofgod.org/jeswar.htm
After big war, people cry for peace
Than pope offer solution, If you want peace let make one world government.
I believe we have to start prepare spiritualy, I believe in post tribulation rapture
Doctrine Pretrib create by jesuit aswell.
https://www.talkjesus.com/threads/p...e-a-lie-created-by-the-jesuits-of-rome.53942/
-
3
- Show all
Reformer was believe pope is the antichrist.
That was believe 1200 day in Daniel mean 1200 years
So all pope was antichrist, antichrist is not one. To Prof that doctrine wrong jesuit make another doctrine, 1200 day was literal day so pope that time was not antichrist.
I my self believe pope is the antichrist all pope. But I believe the last pope Will be the antichrist that enforce mark of the beast.
http://www.velocity.net/~edju70/Pretrib4.htm
Quote
Also during this period, acclaimed Jesuit apologist Cardinal Robert Bellarmine, wrote "Polemic Lectures Concerning the Disputed Points of the Christian Belief Against the Heretics of This Time." His purpose in doing so was to refute the Historic theory of figuring Daniel's 1260, 1290 and 2300 days as years, relegating these to actual days, e.g., 1260 days, etc. By doing so, the reign of Antichrist was pushed into a future time and negated Catholicism and its pope as the man of sin and his system during his time.
End quote
That was believe 1200 day in Daniel mean 1200 years
So all pope was antichrist, antichrist is not one. To Prof that doctrine wrong jesuit make another doctrine, 1200 day was literal day so pope that time was not antichrist.
I my self believe pope is the antichrist all pope. But I believe the last pope Will be the antichrist that enforce mark of the beast.
http://www.velocity.net/~edju70/Pretrib4.htm
Quote
Also during this period, acclaimed Jesuit apologist Cardinal Robert Bellarmine, wrote "Polemic Lectures Concerning the Disputed Points of the Christian Belief Against the Heretics of This Time." His purpose in doing so was to refute the Historic theory of figuring Daniel's 1260, 1290 and 2300 days as years, relegating these to actual days, e.g., 1260 days, etc. By doing so, the reign of Antichrist was pushed into a future time and negated Catholicism and its pope as the man of sin and his system during his time.
End quote
If you want read more about Hegelian dialectic this is the link
,https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hegel-dialectics/
Thesis > antithesis > synthesis.
You want to create one world government.
Not easy to convince people to follow what you want,
So let secretly create a big war, It Will couse famine and suffering, this is thesis
Than people cry for peace. This is antithesis
We come pretend to be savior over solution, let make one world government
This is synthesis.
Hypocrit create war, to achieve their goal Enslave all people in the name of peace one world government
,https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hegel-dialectics/
Thesis > antithesis > synthesis.
You want to create one world government.
Not easy to convince people to follow what you want,
So let secretly create a big war, It Will couse famine and suffering, this is thesis
Than people cry for peace. This is antithesis
We come pretend to be savior over solution, let make one world government
This is synthesis.
Hypocrit create war, to achieve their goal Enslave all people in the name of peace one world government
-
2
- Show all
If you were to research the word "mark" spoken of in Rev. 13:16&17 and Rev. 14:9&11 you will find that the word "mark is talking about "to engrave" or a mark that will be"stamped" or an"imprinted mark".
Today if you were to put into your computer "RFID TATTOO" you will find that there has been an ink created that can be programed with information and can be read by a reader of some sort and they are already using this programmable ink on cattle and have been tattooing cattle since 2007. This ink can also be an invisible ink.
They are pushing the micro chip thing because right now people are not mentally ready to receive mark as in a programmable tattoo.
Back when I did the research one example I found was a bar in Barcelona Spain that would for a price insert a micro chip into your hand or arm so that you would get status at the bar. You could walk up to the door and the door would open for you and you never had to take out your wallet because as soon as you walked through the door they would know how much money you had and who you banked with.
But a micro chip can be dug out and but into someone else so it has a flaw. A tattoo however would need to be carved off or covered over with another tattoo. But if the tattoo is programed can simply covering a RFID tattoo stop a reader from reading the covered tattoo?
And if a tattoo was put into the same spot on every human and it was against the law to remove that tattoo and carving a tattoo out of your skin would be impossible to do without leaving a scare of some sort. The we would be forced to keep the mark even if we were to change our mind. Bottom line is "Don't take the mark in the first place".
Today if you were to put into your computer "RFID TATTOO" you will find that there has been an ink created that can be programed with information and can be read by a reader of some sort and they are already using this programmable ink on cattle and have been tattooing cattle since 2007. This ink can also be an invisible ink.
They are pushing the micro chip thing because right now people are not mentally ready to receive mark as in a programmable tattoo.
Back when I did the research one example I found was a bar in Barcelona Spain that would for a price insert a micro chip into your hand or arm so that you would get status at the bar. You could walk up to the door and the door would open for you and you never had to take out your wallet because as soon as you walked through the door they would know how much money you had and who you banked with.
But a micro chip can be dug out and but into someone else so it has a flaw. A tattoo however would need to be carved off or covered over with another tattoo. But if the tattoo is programed can simply covering a RFID tattoo stop a reader from reading the covered tattoo?
And if a tattoo was put into the same spot on every human and it was against the law to remove that tattoo and carving a tattoo out of your skin would be impossible to do without leaving a scare of some sort. The we would be forced to keep the mark even if we were to change our mind. Bottom line is "Don't take the mark in the first place".