Most Christians simply do not have a clear understanding about the nature of mental illness. I think when most Christians use the term they are talking about hard and complicated problems that produce significant debilitating effects. When they see these problems they find them to be so extreme and troubling that they believe they must require some type of medication to correct a perceived physical problem.
Christians are right to want to provide all the help possible for these kinds of problems. If we want to provide real help, however, it will be important to know what we’re talking about when we use the term.
MORE
I agree.
It really only takes a bit of calm, rational thought to sort it out.
A. Do you have a brain?
B. Is that a physical thing which might encounter physical maladies?
C. Do you live in a fallen world where physical maladies are common?
The answer to the existence of mental illness just logically appears.
Fallen World / Multiple Problems
In a fallen world, it is possible to have physical ailments which affect any part of us, including our physical brains.
I think the theological disconnect occurs when we try to explain the overlap between these physical ailments, demon possession, sin, and emotional problems... all of which can cause a person to be irrational.
As Christians, we needn't just PICK ONE explanation, and disregard all others.
We live in a fallen world, it is possible for their to be multiple causes for our problems.
A. Demon possession, according to scripture, is real.
B. Sin, and the entire vast array of emotional problems it creates, is real.
C. Physical illness, which can affect any part of your physical body, including your brain, is real.
As Christians, we needn't tie ourselves to only one of these explanations, in some attempt to be more theological.
They ALL SQUARE WITH SCRIPTURE.
All of these explanations square with scripture.
So, mental illness is a real thing.
But it isn't necessarily the only explanation for a person being irrational.
Also, to believe mental illness exists, is NOT to necessarily tie us to every conclusion or diagnosis the modern psychological establishment arrives at.
We don't have to commit ouselves to agreeing with every little thing they say.
(A few years back homosexuality was clinically diagnosed as a mental illness, and now it is not. Well, whatever homosexuality is, it certainly cannot be an illness one day, and then not an illness the next day. Therefore, although mental illness exists, we needn't rationally have to agree to every little thing the medical establishment comes up with. To commit ourselves to the existence of mental illness in general is not to commit ourselves to the existence of every mental illness in particular.)
Alright guys, I'm just chucking out a few ideas about WHY I think we have so much disagreement on this issue.
There is usually disagreement for some reason.
God Bless.
.