God's Existence Is a Mathematical Theorem within Standard Physics

As the title indicates, God's existence is a mathematical theorem within standard physics. Standard physics is the known laws of physics, viz., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics. This theorem has been given in the form of physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology. These aforestated known physical laws have been confirmed by every experiment conducted to date. Hence, the only way to avoid Tipler's Omega Point Theorem is to reject empirical science. As Prof. Stephen Hawking wrote, "one cannot really argue with a mathematical theorem." (From p. 67 of Stephen Hawking, The Illustrated A Brief History of Time [New York, NY: Bantam Books, 1996; 1st ed., 1988].)

Prof. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology has been extensively peer-reviewed and published in a number of the world's leading physics and science journals, such as Reports on Progress in Physics (the leading journal of the Institute of Physics, Britain's main professional organization for physicists), Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (one of the world's leading astrophysics journals), the International Journal of Theoretical Physics (a journal that Nobel Prize in Physics winner Richard Feynman also published in), and Physics Letters, among other journals.

Prof. Tipler's Ph.D. is in the field of Global General Relativity, which is the field created by Profs. Stephen Hawking and Roger Penrose during the formulation of their Singularity Theorems in the 1960s. Global General Relativity is General Relativity applied on the scale of the entire universe as a whole, and is the most elite and rarefied field of physics. Tipler is also an expert in quantum field theory (i.e., Quantum Mechanics combined with special-relativistic particle physics) and computer theory.

For much more on Prof. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology and the details on how it uniquely conforms to, and precisely matches, the cosmology described in the New Testament, see my following article, which also addresses the societal implications of the Omega Point cosmology:

* James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708, https://archive.org/download/ThePhy...TheoryOfEverything/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf , https://purl.org/redford/physics-of-god , https://webcitation.org/74HMsJGbP .

Additionally, in the below resource are different sections which contain some helpful notes and commentary by me pertaining to multimedia wherein Prof. Tipler explains the Omega Point cosmology and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model TOE.

* James Redford, "Video of Profs. Frank Tipler and Lawrence Krauss's Debate at Caltech: Can Physics Prove God and Christianity?", alt.sci.astro, Message-ID: jghev8tcbv02b6vn3uiq8jmelp7jijluqk[at sign]4ax[period]com , July 30, 2013, https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.sci.astro/KQWt4KcpMVo , https://archive.is/a04w9 , https://webcitation.org/6IUTAMEyS .

I thought you might be interested in this one Auntie

I tried to send you a message but your settings shunned me. lol

I'll fix that. I can message you and then you can respond. it's the gatekeeper version of the pm feature

Welcome, and nice to meet you, Brother James.

Wow! Lots of information. I'm still working through your "Physics of God - Theory of Everything" article on the archive.org. Bear with me, I have a few questions, if you don't mind addressing them. Thank you.

Right off the bat:
In The Nature of God article, chapter 7.4, 7.4.1 The Problem of Evil, your statement "a logically paradoxical strange loop whereby the knowledge of good and evil doesn’t exist in existence", am I correct in my assumption that this takes into account and agrees with the written Word of God which proclaims that He created good and evil Himself? [Isaiah 45:7 "I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things."]

Also:
In the 7.2 chapter, The Aseity of God, you explain Existence is the Ultimate Fractal. My question: Do I understand you correctly, when you write about the Absolute Infinite, or God is the Logos, that you are suggesting that the Lord may be found logically?

Thanks again for any additional input. I will continue reading your information and viewing the videos as time permits. Thanks for sharing your work. May the Lord Jesus Christ be glorified.

Welcome, and nice to meet you, Brother James.


Wow! Lots of information. I'm still working through your "Physics of God - Theory of Everything" article on the archive.org. Bear with me, I have a few questions, if you don't mind addressing them. Thank you.


Right off the bat:

In The Nature of God article, chapter 7.4, 7.4.1 The Problem of Evil, your statement "a logically paradoxical strange loop whereby the knowledge of good and evil doesn’t exist in existence", am I correct in my assumption that this takes into account and agrees with the written Word of God which proclaims that He created good and evil Himself? [Isaiah 45:7 "I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things."]

Also:

In the 7.2 chapter, The Aseity of God, you explain Existence is the Ultimate Fractal. My question: Do I understand you correctly, when you write about the Absolute Infinite, or God is the Logos, that you are suggesting that the Lord may be found logically?

Thanks again for any additional input. I will continue reading your information and viewing the videos as time permits. Thanks for sharing your work. May the Lord Jesus Christ be glorified.

Hi Brother James, I read a good portion of the information you posted till it felt like my brain would burst. A few hypotheses threw me, I won't get into it because this is your thread, and I don't want to derail it. May I ask what is it you're hoping to accomplish with this thread? The reason I ask is it would help me to better understand what conclusion you want us to come to and why. Does that make sense? For instance, is the God you say can be proven by physics an actual Person, or just a Math Theorem? That would give me better insight into what your research is stating. Thank you.

As the title indicates, God's existence is a mathematical theorem within standard physics. Standard physics is the known laws of physics, viz., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics. This theorem has been given in the form of physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology. These aforestated known physical laws have been confirmed by every experiment conducted to date. Hence, the only way to avoid Tipler's Omega Point Theorem is to reject empirical science. As Prof. Stephen Hawking wrote, "one cannot really argue with a mathematical theorem." (From p. 67 of Stephen Hawking, The Illustrated A Brief History of Time [New York, NY: Bantam Books, 1996; 1st ed., 1988].)

Prof. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology has been extensively peer-reviewed and published in a number of the world's leading physics and science journals, such as Reports on Progress in Physics (the leading journal of the Institute of Physics, Britain's main professional organization for physicists), Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (one of the world's leading astrophysics journals), the International Journal of Theoretical Physics (a journal that Nobel Prize in Physics winner Richard Feynman also published in), and Physics Letters, among other journals.

Prof. Tipler's Ph.D. is in the field of Global General Relativity, which is the field created by Profs. Stephen Hawking and Roger Penrose during the formulation of their Singularity Theorems in the 1960s. Global General Relativity is General Relativity applied on the scale of the entire universe as a whole, and is the most elite and rarefied field of physics. Tipler is also an expert in quantum field theory (i.e., Quantum Mechanics combined with special-relativistic particle physics) and computer theory.

For much more on Prof. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology and the details on how it uniquely conforms to, and precisely matches, the cosmology described in the New Testament, see my following article, which also addresses the societal implications of the Omega Point cosmology:

* James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708, https://archive.org/download/ThePhy...TheoryOfEverything/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf , https://purl.org/redford/physics-of-god , https://webcitation.org/74HMsJGbP .

Additionally, in the below resource are different sections which contain some helpful notes and commentary by me pertaining to multimedia wherein Prof. Tipler explains the Omega Point cosmology and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model TOE.

* James Redford, "Video of Profs. Frank Tipler and Lawrence Krauss's Debate at Caltech: Can Physics Prove God and Christianity?", alt.sci.astro, Message-ID: jghev8tcbv02b6vn3uiq8jmelp7jijluqk[at sign]4ax[period]com , July 30, 2013, https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.sci.astro/KQWt4KcpMVo , https://archive.is/a04w9 , https://webcitation.org/6IUTAMEyS .

I hope I did not offend you, Brother. I truly am interested in your writings. I was doubting myself as I tend to get obsessed with science (quantum & astrophysics), so much so that I usually think myself into a corner. I am not intelligent enough to grasp it as you do. Most of the time, it's Greek to me. haha

I didn't want to go any further studying it until I knew for sure I was on the right track. I appreciate your answer about wanting to undo the spell the world is in. Praise God! I get so burdened with the demonic veil over the world's eyes. I know God is able to reveal Himself to everyone. I pray He uses your work. I will keep you in prayer that the Lord be glorified thru your ministry. Thank you for being patient with me.