This is going to be a long read...
I do not have good grammar or sentence structure, so it will be a hard read....
But, I can promise you, this just shook my faith to the core and made me realize God is so much more powerful and real than we can even fathom...
This journey starts with an experiment called the "electron double slot experiment".
Link provided here ---> CLICK HERE
Before I start they do explain the experiment wrong, for instance, the way they explain the experiment with super-positions would mean the pattern would be 2 bands with a gradient of potential hits filtering out...
The only way to account for the interference wave is if the electron is a wave when not observed and a particle when observed IE it hits the board.
Basically with that experiment you are left with 4 plausible conclusions.
1.) The electrons being tested are constructs of your imagination.
2.) The universe is one of an infinite amount of universes.
3.) The electron is sentient, meaning it is a living being.
4.) We live in a hologram/computer.
We will start with them in chronological order and see which one holds weight...
1.) If the electrons are figments of our imaginations this would mean either A every experiment would yield different results depending on who is testing or B we are apart of a hive mind.
A.) we know we don't get different results therefore we can rule that possibility out.
B.) everyone has completely different thoughts, actions, experiences. etc. so we can rule hive mind out.
Conclusion, theory 1 is wrong.
2.) We are one of an infinite amount of universes.
This theory assumes an astronomically improbable event, meaning every single time an electron moves in the universe, another universe is creating with 2 possibilities of the electron being a particle and another universe where it is a wave. We would have to be in the only universe in existence where it is correct every single time...
This is impossible.
Conclusion theory 2 is wrong.
3.) Holds true so far, electrons being sentient would explain all phenomena shown under the experiment. So far this can not be ruled out.
conclusion needs more testing.
4.) The theory that we are apart of an hologram/computer simulation holds water as well.
Conclusion needs more testing.
Further testing is here ------> Further Testing
So with our last two theory's we can conclude that if the electron was sentient that it would have an innate nature... This nature would to be either observed or not observed... For simplicity lets assume its nature was to not be observed... According to that nature the particle would constantly land on D1 and or D2, to prevent any possible forced observation of which slit it went through...
However, what we see its a statistically perfectly random event where it is a 50/50 chance of recording or not. Meaning the electron is not sentient, but in fact behaving by bound laws.
This leaves us with the last plausible conclusion we are in a computer simulation.
I do not have good grammar or sentence structure, so it will be a hard read....
But, I can promise you, this just shook my faith to the core and made me realize God is so much more powerful and real than we can even fathom...
This journey starts with an experiment called the "electron double slot experiment".
Link provided here ---> CLICK HERE
Before I start they do explain the experiment wrong, for instance, the way they explain the experiment with super-positions would mean the pattern would be 2 bands with a gradient of potential hits filtering out...
The only way to account for the interference wave is if the electron is a wave when not observed and a particle when observed IE it hits the board.
Basically with that experiment you are left with 4 plausible conclusions.
1.) The electrons being tested are constructs of your imagination.
2.) The universe is one of an infinite amount of universes.
3.) The electron is sentient, meaning it is a living being.
4.) We live in a hologram/computer.
We will start with them in chronological order and see which one holds weight...
1.) If the electrons are figments of our imaginations this would mean either A every experiment would yield different results depending on who is testing or B we are apart of a hive mind.
A.) we know we don't get different results therefore we can rule that possibility out.
B.) everyone has completely different thoughts, actions, experiences. etc. so we can rule hive mind out.
Conclusion, theory 1 is wrong.
2.) We are one of an infinite amount of universes.
This theory assumes an astronomically improbable event, meaning every single time an electron moves in the universe, another universe is creating with 2 possibilities of the electron being a particle and another universe where it is a wave. We would have to be in the only universe in existence where it is correct every single time...
This is impossible.
Conclusion theory 2 is wrong.
3.) Holds true so far, electrons being sentient would explain all phenomena shown under the experiment. So far this can not be ruled out.
conclusion needs more testing.
4.) The theory that we are apart of an hologram/computer simulation holds water as well.
Conclusion needs more testing.
Further testing is here ------> Further Testing
So with our last two theory's we can conclude that if the electron was sentient that it would have an innate nature... This nature would to be either observed or not observed... For simplicity lets assume its nature was to not be observed... According to that nature the particle would constantly land on D1 and or D2, to prevent any possible forced observation of which slit it went through...
However, what we see its a statistically perfectly random event where it is a 50/50 chance of recording or not. Meaning the electron is not sentient, but in fact behaving by bound laws.
This leaves us with the last plausible conclusion we are in a computer simulation.