So what...has nothing to to with my biblical reference and what Paul said about men with long hair.....
I would offer the subject matter is "representative glory" throughout the whole chapter is to cover it or to uncover it. The subject matter does not change in regard to the statement... "Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered." Still in reference to covering or uncovering glory. Saying even look to the customs of the world that the heathen who had no direct revelation did (by regarding long hair as a woman’s glory) “by nature” the things contained in the cerinimoinal Law. They see it as a glory .
The Nazarene vow could be of either a woman or a man . Paul was under the temporal vow, some say Jesus had also taken the vow. It was not a shame that his hair was long. Again length has nothing to do with it. Whether it is covered or unconverted it remains the purpose. Mans hair is not given as a glory. His uncovered hair/head is his own representative glory .Together as one to represent one bride of Christ the church. Its something that has all been but lost in exchange for.... oh well fashions come and fashions go.
Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a
woman pray unto God
uncovered? Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him? But if a woman have long hair,
it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering. 1 Corithgians 11:13 to 15