Can We Eliminate the Divide Between Calvinism and Arminianism?
- Thread starter xjohnson
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Notice the word predestined is there for elect men and elect angels. It is not there speaking of the reprobates, however.
God has ORDAINED that all the wicked that are found outside of Christ at the White Throne Judgment.......that is two different things that you wrongly attempt to conflate. Do you understand that predestination is used positively for the sanctification of the elect.
God has ORDAINED that all the wicked that are found outside of Christ at the White Throne Judgment.......that is two different things that you wrongly attempt to conflate. Do you understand that predestination is used positively for the sanctification of the elect.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
Let’s take the entire statement from Romans 9:15-18:
After reading the above, doesn’t it naturally follow that you would ask: upon whom has God chosen to give mercy, and who has God chosen to harden? Why is it that I don’t find people asking this question? If God said, “I will give a million dollars to whomever I will”, then won’t people be asking the question: “to whom will God give a million dollars”?
Upon whom did God choose to give mercy? The answer is found in the very same letter in Romans 11:30-32:
The Gentiles obtained mercy. Mercy was shown to the Gentiles. Apparently, God willed to show mercy to the Gentiles.
Who did God choose to harden? The answer to this question is found in Romans 11:7:
The vast majority of Jews were blinded to the Gospel - hardened, if you will. Apparently, God willed to harden the Jews.
What errors do you find in the approach I have taken here? Thanks.
For He says to Moses, “I will have mercy on whomever I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whomever I will have compassion. So, then it is not of him who wills, nor of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy. Therefore He has mercy on whom He wills, and whom He wills He hardens.
After reading the above, doesn’t it naturally follow that you would ask: upon whom has God chosen to give mercy, and who has God chosen to harden? Why is it that I don’t find people asking this question? If God said, “I will give a million dollars to whomever I will”, then won’t people be asking the question: “to whom will God give a million dollars”?
Upon whom did God choose to give mercy? The answer is found in the very same letter in Romans 11:30-32:
For as you [Gentiles] were once disobedient to God, yet have now obtained mercy through their [Jews'] disobedience, even so these also have now been disobedient, that through the mercy shown you they also may obtain mercy. For God has committed them all to disobedience, that He might have mercy on all.
The Gentiles obtained mercy. Mercy was shown to the Gentiles. Apparently, God willed to show mercy to the Gentiles.
Who did God choose to harden? The answer to this question is found in Romans 11:7:
What then? Israel has not obtained what it seeks; but the elect have obtained it, and the rest were blinded.
The vast majority of Jews were blinded to the Gospel - hardened, if you will. Apparently, God willed to harden the Jews.
What errors do you find in the approach I have taken here? Thanks.
-
1
- Show all
And you should know (as well as anyone else) that that was A DODGE. So they used the word "fore-ordained", but as far as Calvinists are concerned there is no difference between predestined and foreordained. Honesty should have required the same word in both cases. But then Reformed Theology would have to admit that God arbitrarily chooses some for salvation and others for damnation.
The error is in attempting to separate Israel into Jews and Gentiles.
The error is in thinking that the Lord Jesus Christ was plan B and He was a failed plan for the Jews.
The error is in thinking that the elect applies only to the Jews of physical Israel.
Romans 9:6-8
6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:
7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called.
8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.
Galatians 3:6-7
6 Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.
7 Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham.
The error is in thinking that the Lord Jesus Christ was plan B and He was a failed plan for the Jews.
The error is in thinking that the elect applies only to the Jews of physical Israel.
Romans 9:6-8
6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:
7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called.
8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.
Galatians 3:6-7
6 Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.
7 Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham.
-
1
- Show all
calvinists seem to assume that God hardens some for no real reason and saves others for no real reason..
But the Bible time and time again says that God hardens and gives over to delusion those who hate the Love of the truth and love evil....
So yes God will have mercy upon whom so ever He will have mercy and He will harden those He wills to harden .. But He has reason for doing this.. He is not up their spinning a coin,, Heads I will save him tails he goes to hell..
2 Thessalonians 2: KJV
8 "And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming: {9} Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, {10} And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. {11} And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: {12} That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness."
But the Bible time and time again says that God hardens and gives over to delusion those who hate the Love of the truth and love evil....
So yes God will have mercy upon whom so ever He will have mercy and He will harden those He wills to harden .. But He has reason for doing this.. He is not up their spinning a coin,, Heads I will save him tails he goes to hell..
2 Thessalonians 2: KJV
8 "And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming: {9} Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, {10} And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. {11} And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: {12} That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness."
Once again i have to say i included seems in my statement.. You cannot have it both ways.. Saying i made a definitive statement and when i point out the word seems then you change tack and say i do not know.. And then swing back to make again the statement that i made a definitive statement.. All the while responding as a non-calvinist and thus you do not know what stance the calvinists have on the issue..
Amazing.. Why are you trying to throw a spanner in the discussion? If you are not a Calvinist or an anti-calvinist what are you doing injecting nothing but disruption into this discussion?
Amazing.. Why are you trying to throw a spanner in the discussion? If you are not a Calvinist or an anti-calvinist what are you doing injecting nothing but disruption into this discussion?
-
1
- Show all
