The Basics of Speaking in Tongues

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Waggles

Senior Member
Sep 21, 2017
3,338
1,262
113
South
adelaiderevival.com
#61
No one will convince me that the modern practice of some ecstatic jibberish portrayed as tongues and practiced by most today is of or from God.....
Then I guess you miss out on all the benefits of praying in other tongues for God acknowledges and embraces what you call
gibberish. God fully understands this marvellous spiritual language that is over and beyond mere human utterances; and responds
with much answered prayer, miracles and healings.
 
J

jaybird88

Guest
#62
Then I guess you miss out on all the benefits of praying in other tongues for God acknowledges and embraces what you call
gibberish. God fully understands this marvellous spiritual language that is over and beyond mere human utterances; and responds
with much answered prayer, miracles and healings.
does the Most High not acknowledge and embrace our prayers in our common language like the way His Son prayed and taught others to pray?
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,742
3,670
113
#63
Yep......."LANGUAGES" A.K.A. tongues <---NOT for those which believe, yet practiced every week in churches of so called believers and not after the manner of Acts 2 where a MAN like PETER speaks and 17 or 18 different nationalities HEAR in their own language.....

I personally believe a honest look into the matter reveals the end of these things when the word of God was completed......and for sure, No one will convince me that the modern practice of some ecstatic jibberish portrayed as tongues and practiced by most today is of or from God.....
Right, tongues = languages. And I believe the Acts 2 phenomenom did not necessarily cease when God's Word (the Canon) was completed. They are still a sign for the unbeliever...and there are plenty of them today.
 
#64
The biggest damage has been done by translating the word tongue or tongues instead of language or languages IMV.......replace with the word language and then think about the truth that it sets forth........
When one speaks audibly, out loud, especially within an open assembly there is a chance of pretense, or overthinking, or spending too much time "over thinking" what words are chosen.....How many times have we seen someone pray openly in a LANGUAGE "speaking" and pray in the KING JAMES language or stumble in their prayer etc.......
Jesus said when you pray enter the closet "of your mind" and pray in secret.....
I really believe this whole debacle of "tongues" has been overplayed by many......too many times we see examples that are contrary to what took place in Acts 2, too many examples that flies against Paul's words concerning speaking words of understanding, etc.......
The word is LANGUAGES or LANGUAGE.......and what took place in Acts were simple men speaking in their own language and the people hearing in their own native languages.........
and I cannot get around the word cease and the practical application and 1st century A.D. usage of the word perfect........
Hello dcontroversal;

Good point! There has to be a discernment of tongues in an open assembly. A Pastor I know once refuted someone in the congregation (about 300) for displaying exactly what you shared, and this hindered the flow of the spirit, the overplay part.

God bless you and your family.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
#66
Then I guess you miss out on all the benefits of praying in other tongues for God acknowledges and embraces what you call
gibberish. God fully understands this marvellous spiritual language that is over and beyond mere human utterances; and responds
with much answered prayer, miracles and healings.
He understands my English just fine and looks upon the heart of man, not some mumbo jumbo ecstatic jibberish passed off as languages.......
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
#67
Right, tongues = languages. And I believe the Acts 2 phenomenom did not necessarily cease when God's Word (the Canon) was completed. They are still a sign for the unbeliever...and there are plenty of them today.
That is fine and I do believe it ceased with the completion of the word of God....I don't believe that.....Faith comes by hearing and hearing by the word, not signs...........has supernaturally imparted knowledge continued, what about new prophetic utterances.........?

We have the mind of Christ, the completed word of God and all that we need in scriptures......the words cease, vanish and fail are clear, so are the words,"when that which is perfect is come"...the word perfect means complete, Jesus is not described as a "THAT" no where in scriptures and the implication is obvious....there is not one indication it means when JESUS comes and can be applied grammatically unto the word being completed......I have yet to see it done the way it was done in the bible, I have yet to hear one person when "explaining" what takes place in their church explain something similar to what took place in the bible and almost without exception it is women that are the ones doing it, without exception there are no "proof" that it is of or from God and everyone I know that has seen it has said it was some fleshly, ecstatic, emotionally charged experience where no discernible language was present.............and I will point out yet again.....THE ONLY church that had to be corrected was the spiritually immature Corinthian assembly....NO other church is given any instruction on it, no other church is corrected and or is it even mentioned in the church letters, and on top of that....PAUL said to COVET the best gifts with tongues "languages" not listed as the BEST yet almost to a T ALL boast and brag of this supposed gift while saying that those who do not buy it based upon the above evidences have no clue and do not understand the word.........
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
5,247
1,104
113
#68
Only Pentecostals and Charismatics hold to that doctrine. The genuine spiritual gift of tongues was evident during the Apostolic Age. God enabled men to SUPERNATURALLY speak foreign languages which they had never learned or heard. This was primarily to convince unbelieving Jews that the power behind the Gospel was that of God, and this was a sign gift, a miracle.

And as Paul made it crystal clear in 1 Corinthians (1) not all would have the spiritual gift of tongues, (2) those who spoke would need an interpreter within the assembly, (3) Paul would rather have spoken 5 words of prophecy than 10,000 words in tongues, and (4) women were to keep silence in the churches.
There are two types of "tongue" experiences:
1. Upon the initial infilling of the Holy Ghost baptism each person will speak in tongues. (Acts 2:1-4, 2:38-41, 8:12-18, 10:44-48, 19:1-6)
2. Spiritual gift of speaking in different tongues or interpretation of tongues for the edification of the church body. (1 Cor 12:1-11)
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
5,247
1,104
113
#69
An interesting truth.....Paul spoke at least 3 languages......and being educated probably 4 to 5.......in the Minimum he spoke Hebrew, Latin, Greek and probably Aramaic which is 4....

1st Corinthians 14:18 I thank my God, I speak with languages more than ye all............key word bolded ^^^^^^^^
Absolutely amazing attempt at diversion. Come on be serious.
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
5,247
1,104
113
#70
Had these 3,000 spoken in tongues (as did the 120 or a portion thereof) surely it would have been recorded by divine inspiration. What happened that day was phenomenal as to the salvation of souls.

Acts 8 must be excluded.
14 Now when the apostles which were at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the word of God, they sent unto them Peter and John:
15 Who, when they were come down, prayed for them, that they might receive the Holy Ghost:
16 (For as yet he was fallen upon none of them: only they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.)
17 Then laid they their hands on them, and they received the Holy Ghost.
[NO MENTION OF TONGUES]
38 And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and they went down both into the water, both Philip and the eunuch; and he baptized him. [NO MENTION OF TONGUES]
39 And when they were come up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord caught away Philip, that the eunuch saw him no more: and he went on his way rejoicing.

But there were VERY GOOD REASONS for tongues in Acts 10 and 19 cases.

THE BELIEVING JEWS NEEDED EVIDENCE ABOUT GENTILE CONVERSION
And they of the circumcision which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost. For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God... (Acts 10:45,46)
[NOTE: Peter had to be strongly persuaded by God that the door of salvation was open to the Gentiles. His Jewish companions had the same mindset. Therefore both Peter and the Jews needed to see evidence of the baptism with the Holy Spirit for Gentiles]

JOHN THE BAPTIST'S DISCIPLES NEEDED TO SEE THE POWER OF THE HOLY SPIRIT

ACTS 19
1 And it came to pass, that, while Apollos was at Corinth, Paul having passed through the upper coasts came to Ephesus: and finding certain disciples, 2 He said unto them, Have ye received the Holy Ghost since ye believed? And they said unto him, We have not so much as heard whether there be any Holy Ghost. 3 And he said unto them, Unto what then were ye baptized? And they said, Unto John's baptism. 4 Then said Paul, John verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people, that they should believe on him which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus. 5 When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. 6 And when Paul had laid his hands upon them, the Holy Ghost came on them; and they spake with tongues, and prophesied. 7 And all the men were about twelve.
[NOTE: Since they had not even heard about the Holy Spirit, God wanted them to see the power of the Spirit through (a) tongues and (b) prophecies.
It is not unreasonable to conclude that not every component of an event is going to be recorded. We see this throughout scripture. This is clearly why the Word itself confirms that a concept is established by 2-3 witnesses recorded within its pages.
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
5,247
1,104
113
#71
I have given that challenge....and no one seems to want to take it up......if they can speak in tongues they can also drink bleach or antifreeze with no harm <---the logical conclusion based upon their push of Mark.......
Scripture does not lie: "and if they drink any deadly poison, it will not hurt them; " This statement indicates God's children are protected in the event they unknowingly consume something harmful.
However, scripture records Jesus words after Satan told Him to do something harmful to Himself: Jesus said unto him, It is written again, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God." Matt 4:7
So if some idiot chooses to consume something deadly thinking God is going to intervene he is sadly mistaken.
 

Kavik

Senior Member
Mar 25, 2017
795
159
43
#72
@Wansvic
I will pray with the spirit, and I will pray with the understanding also:

This would seem to me to support what I stated in my previous post regarding “praying in the spirit”. It’s how he is praying; not the words he’s saying.

@ Waggles –
No where does scripture teach that praying in the Spirit is about attitude or effort or emotion. No where! Praying in the Spirit is clearly and unequivocally described as NOT praying with understanding - that is NOT praying with our minds in our own language.

I’ll need to respectfully disagree. What you describe is the Pentecostal/Charismatic definition of the phrase.

@ Crossnote –
What kind of sign would that be, people speaking in their own language? We do that everyday.

The ‘sign’ to the Jews was that their God was now accessible to any person in the (known) world and (most importantly) in any language. A concept that was virtually unheard of at the time and for some, almost unthinkable.
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
5,247
1,104
113
#73
Yes its called having a conversation. One spoke in their language the other heard it in theirs own And then the other spoke in their language and the first heard it in their own. The word of God is the interpreter in both cases. No private interpretations . Why trust the interpterion of another perhaps they are influenced by the father of lies and not brining the gospel ?
Scripture always conveys truth and it says they spoke with other tongues, by the Holy Spirit. And in the church setting an individual speaks in an unknown tongue which is then interpreted for edification.

Just because an individual has not experienced it does not discount the fact that God gave this gift to His children for spiritual edification.

God says to ask Him for the gift of the baptism of the Holy Ghost.

And Paul said pray that God bestow a spiritual gift(s) upon you so you can be used to help others in the church body.

Why there is such hostility toward receiving and exercising God's Spirit in order to help others is a mystery to me.
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
5,247
1,104
113
#74
@Wansvic
I will pray with the spirit, and I will pray with the understanding also:

This would seem to me to support what I stated in my previous post regarding “praying in the spirit”. It’s how he is praying; not the words he’s saying.

@ Waggles –
No where does scripture teach that praying in the Spirit is about attitude or effort or emotion. No where! Praying in the Spirit is clearly and unequivocally described as NOT praying with understanding - that is NOT praying with our minds in our own language.

I’ll need to respectfully disagree. What you describe is the Pentecostal/Charismatic definition of the phrase.

@ Crossnote –
What kind of sign would that be, people speaking in their own language? We do that everyday.

The ‘sign’ to the Jews was that their God was now accessible to any person in the (known) world and (most importantly) in any language. A concept that was virtually unheard of at the time and for some, almost unthinkable.
Paul said he prayed and sang WITH the spirit.
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
5,247
1,104
113
#75
That the whole Pentecostal.. I need a sign before I will believe gospel, in a nut shell.
You have it backwards.
Believing takes place before any signs appear.

One believes the gospel, repents, gets water baptized in Jesus name (sometimes before, sometime after the Spirit baptism). Then one of three things happen; God pours out His Spirit upon the person, the person asks for the gift (Luke 11:13), or someone lays hands upon the person and the individual is miraculously filled to overflowing with the Spirit of God with the evidence of speaking in tongues.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,742
3,670
113
#76
That is fine and I do believe it ceased with the completion of the word of God....I don't believe that.....Faith comes by hearing and hearing by the word, not signs...........has supernaturally imparted knowledge continued, what about new prophetic utterances.........?

We have the mind of Christ, the completed word of God and all that we need in scriptures......the words cease, vanish and fail are clear, so are the words,"when that which is perfect is come"...the word perfect means complete, Jesus is not described as a "THAT" no where in scriptures and the implication is obvious....there is not one indication it means when JESUS comes and can be applied grammatically unto the word being completed......I have yet to see it done the way it was done in the bible, I have yet to hear one person when "explaining" what takes place in their church explain something similar to what took place in the bible and almost without exception it is women that are the ones doing it, without exception there are no "proof" that it is of or from God and everyone I know that has seen it has said it was some fleshly, ecstatic, emotionally charged experience where no discernible language was present.............and I will point out yet again.....THE ONLY church that had to be corrected was the spiritually immature Corinthian assembly....NO other church is given any instruction on it, no other church is corrected and or is it even mentioned in the church letters, and on top of that....PAUL said to COVET the best gifts with tongues "languages" not listed as the BEST yet almost to a T ALL boast and brag of this supposed gift while saying that those who do not buy it based upon the above evidences have no clue and do not understand the word.........
Again, tongues (speaking in other languages) are a sign to unbelievers. That truth has never been revoked as we still have unbelievers, and....
Romans 11:29 NKJV
[29] For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable.

I would like to see some Scripture indicating that that gift would cease when the Canon would be complete instead of poor hermeneutical practices by some of taking a verse from 1Cor 13 out of it's context (that chapter is about love plopped in the middle of other chapters on gifts indicating a rebuke to spiritual pride), or by using human reasoning to force our presuppositions onto the text.

Whatever happened to Sola Scriptura?

(Yes, there are abuses, but that could indicate the real McCoy is close at hand as satan loves to counterfeit in order to discredit what is true.)
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
5,247
1,104
113
#77
The logical conclusion is some like the drama show it brings excitement and wonderment to the flesh which they call a faith that follows. Showtime keeps them on the edge of their seat. Prophecy leads a person to believe God (.no outward sign)

They in there desire for show time say...

John 6:30 They said therefore unto him, What sign shewest thou then, "that we may see", and believe thee? what dost thou work?

Jesus knew better.

John 4:48Then said Jesus unto him, Except ye see signs and wonders, ye will not believe
I shared this in another thread but feel it could be useful here as well:
I recalled something that occurred years ago that was very interesting. Our church purchased pews and upon arriving to get them a discussion ensued. The sellers shared that they were "Bapticostals." Well that certainly peaked interest. This was their testimony:
The group of men decided to come together and pray to strengthen their walk with Jesus. As they sincerely cried out in prayer, to their amazement, the entire group was filled with the Holy Ghost and began to speak in tongues. Afterward, they were so filled with joy they could barely contain their excitement as they waited to share the good news with the members of their church.

Sunday came and the men proudly stood before he congregation and relayed their experience. "We were all infilled and spoke in tongues just like the others on the Day of Pentecost. We could hardly believe it ourselves! There is no doubt that what happened to us was from God," they said with smiles beaming from ear to ear.

They went on to say you could have heard a pin drop, when the pastor ushered them to the door and told them they were no longer welcome to fellowship with his church.

The men were surprised by the response of their congregation. However they decided not to be discouraged and to go forward and share the true plan of salvation. They began a church and still refer to themselves as "Bapticostals."

I enjoy this testimony because it gives God all the glory! Our Lord and Savior will honor those who sincerely seek Him.
 

Kavik

Senior Member
Mar 25, 2017
795
159
43
#78
Paul said he prayed and sang WITH the spirit.
OK - that seems to me to indicate that he prayed and sang in the power of the Spirit, by the leading of the Spirit, and according to His will. Nothing about what language he did it in.
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
5,247
1,104
113
#79
OK - that seems to me to indicate that he prayed and sang in the power of the Spirit, by the leading of the Spirit, and according to His will. Nothing about what language he did it in.
God's Word says what it says. Not what we would like it to say. As I noted Paul said he prayed and sang WITH the spirit not in the power of the spirit. Big difference.

"All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works." 2 Tim 3:16-17
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
5,247
1,104
113
#80
Yep......."LANGUAGES" A.K.A. tongues <---NOT for those which believe, yet practiced every week in churches of so called believers and not after the manner of Acts 2 where a MAN like PETER speaks and 17 or 18 different nationalities HEAR in their own language.....

I personally believe a honest look into the matter reveals the end of these things when the word of God was completed......and for sure, No one will convince me that the modern practice of some ecstatic jibberish portrayed as tongues and practiced by most today is of or from God.....
The Word says what it means and means what it says. An individual's lack of the experience of speaking in tongues does not change the fact that the Word of God says it did and will continue to take place.
"For with stammering lips and another tongue will he speak to this people." Isa 28:11
"And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues;" Mark 16:17

The apostles even warned that there would be mockers in the last days that have not the Spirit.
Those who do have the Spirit are to build up their most holy faith by praying in the Holy Ghost. That comes directly from the Word.

Jude 18-20
"How that they told you there should be mockers in the last time, who should walk after their own ungodly lusts.
These be they who separate themselves, sensual, having not the Spirit.
But ye, beloved, building up yourselves on your most holy faith, praying in the Holy Ghost,"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.