Son of Joseph

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Dec 22, 2018
59
19
8
#1
Hi,
I'm not a Christian, but I've been reading the Bible, an ESV New Testament, and straight off, chapter 1 of Matthew I'm stuck!
It seems important to put down Jesus's genealogy..

A) why is it important to know why Jesus is descended from Abraham, David etc.

B) why is it important that it is 14 generations from this person to that person etc.? Is 14 a special number.

C) If Mary was a Virgin then how can Jesus be a descendant via Joseph? Joseph was not his biological father.

Thanks for your answers.
Many blessings.
 

tourist

Senior Member
Mar 13, 2014
42,663
17,117
113
69
Tennessee
#2
Perhaps if you reading the remaining chapters it will begin to make some sense to you. My best guess is that the linage provided in Mathew is a legal one and not strictly genealogical. Jesus does have the blood of his mother Mary though.
 

Deuteronomy

Well-known member
Jun 11, 2018
3,344
3,720
113
68
#3
Hi,
I'm not a Christian, but I've been reading the Bible, an ESV New Testament, and straight off, chapter 1 of Matthew I'm stuck!
It seems important to put down Jesus's genealogy..

A) why is it important to know why Jesus is descended from Abraham, David etc.

B) why is it important that it is 14 generations from this person to that person etc.? Is 14 a special number.

C) If Mary was a Virgin then how can Jesus be a descendant via Joseph? Joseph was not his biological father.

Thanks for your answers.
Many blessings.
Hi Meditator, just wait until you get to the last third of Luke 3, because that genealogy (which is different from Matthew's) takes you from Jesus, all the way back to our progenitors, Adam/Eve, and finally, back to God Himself.

Here are a couple of short articles that I hope will prove useful to you in answering some of your questions. If you have more questions however, please don't hesitate to ask.

https://www.gotquestions.org/Jesus-son-of-David.html

https://www.gotquestions.org/Jesus-genealogy.html

Merry Christmas!

~Deut
p.s. - here are a couple more that might be of interest to you as well:

https://www.gotquestions.org/Bible-genealogies.html

https://www.gotquestions.org/who-is-Jesus.html
 

Deuteronomy

Well-known member
Jun 11, 2018
3,344
3,720
113
68
#4
...why is it important to know why Jesus is descended from Abraham, David etc.
Hi again Meditator, I meant to leave you with this thought in my last post. These are some of Jesus' very last words in the Bible:

Revelation 22
16 “I, Jesus, have sent My angel to testify to you these things for the churches. I am the root and the descendant of David, the bright morning star.”

Since you are reading about Matthew's genealogy right now and asking these questions, there is something else about Jesus that you may want to consider, how can He be both the "root" ~and~ the "offspring" of King David?

Jesus actually posed that very same question to the Pharisees of His day.

Matthew 22
41 While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them a question:
42 “What do you think about the Christ, whose son is He?” They said to Him, “The son of David.”
43 He said to them, “Then how does David in the Spirit call Him ‘Lord,’ saying,
44 ‘THE LORD SAID TO MY LORD,
“SIT AT MY RIGHT HAND,
UNTIL I PUT YOUR ENEMIES BENEATH YOUR FEET” ’?
45 “If David calls Him ‘Lord,’ how is He his son?
46 No one was able to answer Him a word, nor did anyone dare from that day on to ask Him another question.

~Deut
 

Adstar

Senior Member
Jul 24, 2016
7,600
3,624
113
#5
Hi,
I'm not a Christian, but I've been reading the Bible, an ESV New Testament, and straight off, chapter 1 of Matthew I'm stuck!
It seems important to put down Jesus's genealogy..

A) why is it important to know why Jesus is descended from Abraham, David etc.

B) why is it important that it is 14 generations from this person to that person etc.? Is 14 a special number.

C) If Mary was a Virgin then how can Jesus be a descendant via Joseph? Joseph was not his biological father.

Thanks for your answers.
Many blessings.
Welcome to CC Mediator..

A) Because it was foretold that the Messiah would come from the Family line of David.. So the geniology shows that Jesus came from david..

B) No 14 is not a special number as far as i know..

C) Mary was also a decendant of David..
 
Dec 22, 2018
59
19
8
#6
Welcome to CC Mediator..

A) Because it was foretold that the Messiah would come from the Family line of David..

C) Mary was also a decendant of David..
I would have thought that it would make more sense to give Mary's genealogy to establish the bloodline.
 

Adstar

Senior Member
Jul 24, 2016
7,600
3,624
113
#7
I would have thought that it would make more sense to give Mary's genealogy to establish the bloodline.
Well Jesus was the adopted son of Joseph.. And when it comes to legal principle of the time a person becomes the child of the adopting parent..
 
Dec 22, 2018
59
19
8
#8
Well Jesus was the adopted son of Joseph.. And when it comes to legal principle of the time a person becomes the child of the adopting parent..
Perhaps in law at the time, but that wouldn't make him a descendent in any real sense. You can't adopt ancestors like that, it's not a reasonable explanation.
Maybe after the spirit of Jesus went into Mary and she was expecting, maybe then Joseph also went into her and added the biological aspect through his sperm? That would make more sense to me.
I know it doesn't say that exactly in the Bible, but maybe it was something like that? Or maybe God gave Jesus the genetics of Joseph even though Joseph hadn't been with Mary?
I think there must be some way that Jesus was really also biologically connected to Joseph, the 'adopted' or 'legal' explanations just sound inadequate to me.
 

Deuteronomy

Well-known member
Jun 11, 2018
3,344
3,720
113
68
#9
Hi Meditator, actually, the virgin birth of Jesus was prophesied in the Old Testament, and the prophesy is not only repeated and confirmed in the New Testament, it's also spoken of in very exacting terms there as well. For instance:

Isaiah 7
14 The Lord himself shall give you a sign;
Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a Son,
And shall call His name Immanuel.
Matthew 1
18 The birth of Jesus Christ was as follows: when His mother Mary had been betrothed to Joseph, before they came together she was found to be with child by the Holy Spirit.
19 And Joseph her husband, being a righteous man and not wanting to disgrace her, planned to send her away secretly.
20 But when he had considered this, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, “Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary as your wife; for the Child who has been conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit.
21 “She will bear a Son; and you shall call His name Jesus, for He will save His people from their sins.”
22 Now all this took place to fulfill what was spoken by the Lord through the prophet:
23 “BEHOLD, THE VIRGIN SHALL BE WITH CHILD AND SHALL BEAR A SON, AND THEY SHALL CALL HIS NAME IMMANUEL,” which translated means, “GOD WITH US.”
24 And Joseph awoke from his sleep and did as the angel of the Lord commanded him, and took Mary as his wife,
25 but kept her a virgin until she gave birth to a Son; and he called His name Jesus.

~Deut
 
Dec 22, 2018
59
19
8
#10
Hi Meditator, actually, the virgin birth of Jesus was prophesied in the Old Testament, and the prophesy is not only repeated and confirmed in the New Testament, it's also spoken of in very exacting terms elsewhere in the New Testament. For instance:


Isaiah 7
14 The Lord himself shall give you a sign;
Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a Son,
And shall call His name Immanuel.
Matthew 1
18 The birth of Jesus Christ was as follows: when His mother Mary had been betrothed to Joseph, before they came together she was found to be with child by the Holy Spirit.
19 And Joseph her husband, being a righteous man and not wanting to disgrace her, planned to send her away secretly.
20 But when he had considered this, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, “Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary as your wife; for the Child who has been conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit.
21 “She will bear a Son; and you shall call His name Jesus, for He will save His people from their sins.”
22 Now all this took place to fulfill what was spoken by the Lord through the prophet:
23 “BEHOLD, THE VIRGIN SHALL BE WITH CHILD AND SHALL BEAR A SON, AND THEY SHALL CALL HIS NAME IMMANUEL,” which translated means, “GOD WITH US.”
24 And Joseph awoke from his sleep and did as the angel of the Lord commanded him, and took Mary as his wife,
25 but kept her a virgin until she gave birth to a Son; and he called His name Jesus.

~Deut
Then perhaps it's the other thing I said, that God must have given Jesus the blood line/ genetics of Joseph, as I really can't accept that being adopted or being a son by the law gives you actual ancestors.
 

Adstar

Senior Member
Jul 24, 2016
7,600
3,624
113
#11
Perhaps in law at the time, but that wouldn't make him a descendent in any real sense. You can't adopt ancestors like that, it's not a reasonable explanation.
Maybe after the spirit of Jesus went into Mary and she was expecting, maybe then Joseph also went into her and added the biological aspect through his sperm? That would make more sense to me.
I know it doesn't say that exactly in the Bible, but maybe it was something like that? Or maybe God gave Jesus the genetics of Joseph even though Joseph hadn't been with Mary?
I think there must be some way that Jesus was really also biologically connected to Joseph, the 'adopted' or 'legal' explanations just sound inadequate to me.
Well as i said in my initial response Mary was a decendant of David.. So any debate over the validity or otherwise of Joseph's adoption of Jesus is irrelevant.. So if you reject the status of the adopted then move back to Mary and we can move on..

The Bible declares that Joseph did not have sexual relations with Mary until after Jesus was born.. So Joseph made no genetic contribution to the body of Jesus..

Matthew 1: KJV
24 "Then Joseph being raised from sleep did as the angel of the Lord had bidden him, and took unto him his wife: 25 And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS."

I am not sure as to your understanding of old English expression but the term Knew her not is referring to carnal knowledge.. That being sexual intercourse..

Also on a general principle if a person does not believe that an all powerful God can exist then Mary becoming pregnant by the power of God becomes an impossibility they cannot accept.. They will search for a ""natural"" answer to the Super natural.. But once a person believes in the existence of an all powerful God that can cause miracles to happen with just to power of Their will then all the events and happening that are told in the Bible become easy to believe..
 
Dec 22, 2018
59
19
8
#12
Well as i said in my initial response Mary was a decendant of David.. So any debate over the validity or otherwise of Joseph's adoption of Jesus is irrelevant.. So if you reject the status of the adopted then move back to Mary and we can move on..

The Bible declares that Joseph did not have sexual relations with Mary until after Jesus was born.. So Joseph made no genetic contribution to the body of Jesus..

Matthew 1: KJV
24 "Then Joseph being raised from sleep did as the angel of the Lord had bidden him, and took unto him his wife: 25 And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS."

I am not sure as to your understanding of old English expression but the term Knew her not is referring to carnal knowledge.. That being sexual intercourse..

Also on a general principle if a person does not believe that an all powerful God can exist then Mary becoming pregnant by the power of God becomes an impossibility they cannot accept.. They will search for a ""natural"" answer to the Super natural.. But once a person believes in the existence of an all powerful God that can cause miracles to happen with just to power of Their will then all the events and happening that are told in the Bible become easy to believe..
But Matthew describes his descendence through Joseph, specifically, that's not an Accident! There must be meaning in that.
 

Deuteronomy

Well-known member
Jun 11, 2018
3,344
3,720
113
68
#13
Then perhaps it's the other thing I said, that God must have given Jesus the blood line/ genetics of Joseph, as I really can't accept that being adopted or being a son by the law gives you actual ancestors.
I have to run, but quickly, it is the mother who determines the blood line for the Jews (cf a person cannot claim to be a Jew based upon being a child of Abraham alone, rather, they must be a descendant of both Abraham and Sarah, as Hagar also bore Abraham a child, and through their son, Abraham's 1st born, a separate people).

As for adoption, I believe you may find that it's a bit more important in God's eyes than you realize, because it's only through adoption that we are able to become the sons and daughters of the Most High, and receive from Him the inheritance He promised to members of His own family alone (which includes, among many other wondrous things, the gift of eternal life).

Talk to you later today (Dv).

~Deut
 
L

LPT

Guest
#14
I would have thought that it would make more sense to give Mary's genealogy to establish the bloodline.
It was customary in those days to establish bloodlines through the males of a family tree, thus Heli in Luke’s Geno was Mary’s father. the language of the time didn’t have the English equal to (Son In Law) thus written as such Joseph son of heli.
 

Adstar

Senior Member
Jul 24, 2016
7,600
3,624
113
#15
But Matthew describes his descendence through Joseph, specifically, that's not an Accident! There must be meaning in that.
Well i have endeavoured to explain it.. You seem to have rejected the explanation i offered.. So be it.. We can move on to the next question or point if you like..
 
L

LPT

Guest
#16
If your just getting into reading the four gospels, one thing to note, the originals were pretty worn, at times only fragments of a single sentence was recovered so the four gospels are not in chronological order at all more like torn into four pieces and shuffled. you mentioned the geno, here I have put together the verses into a more readable flow, if your interested. and yes 14 does have meaning.

Mt1:1
A record of the genealogy of Jesus Christ the son of David, the son of Abraham:

Mt1:17
Thus there were fourteen generations in all from Abraham to David,
Fourteen from David to the exile to Babylon, and fourteen from the exile to the Christ.

(14) ~ generations ~ Mt1:6b: (1st) David was the father of Solomon, whose mother had been Uriah's wife,

Mt1:7
(2nd) Solomon the father of Rehoboam,
(3rd) Rehoboam the father of Abijah,
(4th) Abijah the father of Asa,

Mt1:8
(5th) Asa the father of Jehoshaphat,
(6th) Jehoshaphat the father of Jehoram,
(7th) Jehoram the father of Uzziah,

Mt1:9
(8th) Uzziah the father of Jotham,
(9th) Jotham the father of Ahaz,
(10th) Ahaz the father of Hezekiah,

Mt1:10
(11th) Hezekiah the father of Manasseh,
(12th) Manasseh the father of Amon,
(13th) Amon the father of Josiah,

Mt1:11 and (14th) Josiah the father of (Jeconiah) and his brothers at the time of the exile to Babylon.

(14) ~ generations ~ Mt1:12
After the exile to Babylon:
(1st) Jeconiah was the father of Shealtiel,
(2nd) Shealtiel the father of Zerubbabel,

Mt1:13
(3rd) Zerubbabel the father of Abiud,
(4th) Abiud the father of Eliakim,
(5th) Eliakim the father of Azor,

Mt1:14
(6th) Azor the father of Zadok,
(7th) Zadok the father of Akim,
(8th) Akim the father of Eliud,

Mt1:15
(9th) Eliud the father of Eleazar,
(10th) Eleazar the father of Matthan,
(11th) Matthan the father of Jacob,

Mt1:16
and (12th) Jacob the father of (13th) Joseph,
the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus,
who is called (14th) Christ.

(40) ~ generations ~ Lk3:23
Now Jesus himself was about thirty years old, when he began his ministry. [Baptism]
He was the son, so it was thought, of Joseph, and the son of (40th) Heli, [Mary’s father]

Lk3:24
the son of (39th) Matthat,
the son of (38th) Levi,
the son of (37th) Melki,
the son of (36th) Jannai,
the son of (35th) Joseph,
Lk3:25
the son of (34th) Mattathias,
the son of (33rd) Amos,
the son of (32nd) Nahum,
the son of (31st) Esli,
the son of (30th) Naggai,
Lk3:26
the son of (29th) Maath,
the son of (28th) Mattathias,
the son of (27th) Semein,
the son of (26th) Josech,
the son of (25th) Joda,
Lk3:27
the son of (24th) Joanan,
the son of (23rd) Rhesa,
the son of (22nd) Zerubbabel,
the son of (21st) Shealtiel,
the son of (20th) Neri,
Lk3:28
the son of (19th) Melki,
the son of (18th) Addi,
the son of (17th) Cosam,
the son of (16th) Elmadam,
the son of (15th) Er,
Lk3:29
the son of (14th) Joshua,
the son of (13th) Eliezer,
the son of (12th) Jorim,
the son of (11th) Matthat,
the son of (10th) Levi,
Lk3:30
the son of (9th) Simeon,
the son of (8th) Judah,
the son of (7th) Joseph,
the son of (6th) Jonam,
the son of (5th) Eliakim,
Lk3:31
the son of (4th) Melea,
the son of (3rd) Menna,
the son of (2nd) Mattatha,
the son of (1st) Nathan,
the son of David,
(14) ~ generations
Mt1:6a: and (13th) Jesse the father of (14th) King David. Lk3:32a: the son of Jesse,

Mt1:5c: (12th) Obed the father of Jesse, Lk3:32b: the son of Obed,
Mt1:5b: (11th) Boaz the father of Obed, whose mother was Ruth, Lk3:32c: the son of Boaz,
Mt1:5a: (10th) Salmon the father of Boaz, whose mother was Rahab, Lk3:32d: the son of Salmon,

Mt1:4c: (9th) Nahshon the father of Salmon, Lk3:32e: the son of Nahshon,
Mt1:4b: (8th) Amminadab the father of Nahshon, Lk3:33a: the son of Amminadab,
Mt1:4a: (7th) Ram the father of Amminadab, Lk3:33b: the son of Ram,

Mt1:3c: (6th) Hezron the father of Ram, Lk3:33c: the son of Hezron,
Mt1:3b: (5th) Perez the father of Hezron, Lk3:33d: the son of Perez,
Mt1:3a: (4th) Judah the father of Perez and Zerah, whose mother was Tamar, Lk3:33e: the son of Judah,

Mt1:2c: (3rd) Jacob the father of Judah and his brothers, Lk3:34a: the son of Jacob,
Mt1:2b: (2nd) Isaac the father of Jacob, Lk3:34b: the son of Isaac,
Mt1:2a: (1st) Abraham was the father of Isaac, Lk3:34c: the son of Abraham,

(20) ~ generations
Lk3:34d: the son of (20th) Terah,
Lk3:34e: the son of (19th) Nahor,

Lk3:35
the son of (18th) Serug,
the son of (17th) Reu,
the son of (16th) Peleg,
the son of (15th) Eber,
the son of (14th) Shelah,
Lk3:36
the son of (13th) Cainan,
the son of (12th) Arphaxad,
the son of (11th) Shem,
the son of (10th) Noah,
the son of (9th) Lamech,
Lk3:37
the son of (8th) Methuselah,
the son of (7th) Enoch,
the son of (6th) Jared,
the son of (5th) Mahalalel,
the son of (4th) Kenan,
Lk3:38
the son of (3rd) Enosh,
the son of (2nd) Seth,
the son of (1st) Adam,
the son of God.
 
Dec 22, 2018
59
19
8
#17
God at the beginning and God as Christ at the end.
My instinct tells me this is more important than it seems and may be related to God's whole purpose? It just seems to me as a non-Christian that to highlight genealogy 1st chapter, 1st book of the NT is trying to tell us something... It's not to be skipped over, but to be considered.
3x14?
 
L

LPT

Guest
#18
God at the beginning and God as Christ at the end.
My instinct tells me this is more important than it seems and may be related to God's whole purpose? It just seems to me as a non-Christian that to highlight genealogy 1st chapter, 1st book of the NT is trying to tell us something... It's not to be skipped over, but to be considered.
3x14?
The number 14 represents deliverance or salvation and is used twenty-two times in the Bible. The term "14th" is found 24 times in scriptures.

Seven represents completion - thus 7 + 7 = 14, indicating a double completions
1 Jesus' ministry in the flesh was completed.
2 Jesus' sacrifice ended or fulfilled the need for animal sacrifices.
 
L

LPT

Guest
#19
Deliverance from bondage thus the Passover was on the 14th.