A few more thoughts to add to the discussion:
When I lived overseas I was surprised by two general co-existing attitudes I found. 1) Acceptance that life is hard and painful. To the point that it was no longer evil, suffering, injustice, and corruption that were considered strange or unexpected; rather it was people who were upright and self sacrificing that stuck out as the exception and not the rule. In such a worldview it is not the evil that God permits that seems extreme, but rather the good that he does. Sometimes I wonder how much of our struggle with people being evil is based on the influence of philosophies that believe people are basically good (and is such a belief compatible with the christian doctrine that all have sinned?).
2) Service to God/ idols / spirits/ etc. is primarily for making life easier. And I was really challenged by a friend who asked "Well what is it Christians pray for?" I don't remember what I answered exactly, but the impression was along the lines of health and protection for self and family, guidance to know what to do and my friend responded "OK yeah so that's basically the same as us and our faith then" (which is completely not the impression you want to give when you're supposed to be being a missionary). But as I think about it so often we relate to God on a make things better, more comfortable, less painful for me basis (to the point that now when things are pretty good and stable in my life I struggle with how exactly faith fits in with a life that is good). I'm not sure I like that, my view of God seems to be stuck in such a box, especially when that's a box that doesn't work so well for much of the world. And that's leading to a growing conviction that the good news is only worthy of being called good news if it works for those in the worst situations and is good news to those with the deepest hurts.
I think I first picked up that idea from reading The worthing saga by Orson scott card. Part of the story I remember (and I need to read it again because most of the story is pretty fuzzy) had to do with a planet that had been protected so that the people were spared as much pain as absolutely possible and then what happened when the protectors realized they could no longer do the job and had to start letting pain and bad things happen. I do recommend the book (most of his books, they're really quite good).
When I lived overseas I was surprised by two general co-existing attitudes I found. 1) Acceptance that life is hard and painful. To the point that it was no longer evil, suffering, injustice, and corruption that were considered strange or unexpected; rather it was people who were upright and self sacrificing that stuck out as the exception and not the rule. In such a worldview it is not the evil that God permits that seems extreme, but rather the good that he does. Sometimes I wonder how much of our struggle with people being evil is based on the influence of philosophies that believe people are basically good (and is such a belief compatible with the christian doctrine that all have sinned?).
2) Service to God/ idols / spirits/ etc. is primarily for making life easier. And I was really challenged by a friend who asked "Well what is it Christians pray for?" I don't remember what I answered exactly, but the impression was along the lines of health and protection for self and family, guidance to know what to do and my friend responded "OK yeah so that's basically the same as us and our faith then" (which is completely not the impression you want to give when you're supposed to be being a missionary). But as I think about it so often we relate to God on a make things better, more comfortable, less painful for me basis (to the point that now when things are pretty good and stable in my life I struggle with how exactly faith fits in with a life that is good). I'm not sure I like that, my view of God seems to be stuck in such a box, especially when that's a box that doesn't work so well for much of the world. And that's leading to a growing conviction that the good news is only worthy of being called good news if it works for those in the worst situations and is good news to those with the deepest hurts.
A cogent point. Human brains only seem to have one scale, and we resize all our experiences to fit, as Randal Monroe said.
Now you have me imagining a world where nothing really "bad" as we know it ever happens... and somebody stubs his toe on the corner of a chair and starts questioning why God would allow such a terrible thing to happen, because that's the worst thing they know.
Now you have me imagining a world where nothing really "bad" as we know it ever happens... and somebody stubs his toe on the corner of a chair and starts questioning why God would allow such a terrible thing to happen, because that's the worst thing they know.
- 1
- Show all