I am just going to add my comments over yours in red.
Mat_12:30 He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad.
Luk_11:23 He that is not with me is against me: and he that gathereth not with me scattereth.
To say
"If" in regards God's existence is doubt in what He has already said to you, "I AM", and moreso, denial of the Truth you already know, but hold the truth in unrighteousness.
I am guessing you're a presuppositionalist? In which case - there's no point even talking to you because you're not going to get beyond you're first assumption. If not, God hasn't actually said "I AM" to me it's written in the bible it is no more compelling to me than reading any other religious text. You're assuming there is any reason to even begin to take that text at anything beyond face value - what evidence do you have that such words were ever telepathically transmitted to another human being? The fact that someone wrote it down? - that doesn't make it true anymore than other works of human imagination. This is the important part I would like you to understand about my position. Even though I do not think there is sufficient reason to take any of that beyond a philosophical point of interest, that doesn't mean I don't think it has value to you.
Notice:
Psa_14:1 To the chief Musician, A Psalm of David. The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psa_53:1 To the chief Musician upon Mahalath, Maschil, A Psalm of David. The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. Corrupt are they, and have done abominable iniquity: there is none that doeth good.
The fool says, "No" to God, who says to them, "I AM". They say, "No, God, I AM" ... Thus they cut themselves off from Eternal Life (God).
<-- which God? This is no more compelling than a Muslim telling me there is no God but Allah, yes people have beliefs and those people have opinions about the views of others just like the Author of the Psalms. That doesn't = therefore God exists because again, somebody wrote it down. This isn't the big book of easy answers. Again, there is a historical context here, a. The God of the Bible ie YHWH is a God that derived from a Pantheon of Gods much like the Roman or Greek Pantheons. Overtime, after contact with the religion of Zoroaster, which was monotheistic the Hebrews became monotheistic too worshiping only YHWH. It's of no suprise such sentiments would be contained within a bibliography of cultural religious works that centered around a single deity. Yet again just because it is in a book doesn't say anything about the reality of it.
Jesus said:
Joh 8:58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.
Joh 8:24 I said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for
if ye believe not that I am he,
ye shall die in your sins.
<-- Again, historical context and not a surprise...how does that = reality. Also, not that these two versus are examples of this have a read through this page for additional perspective https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Bible_interpolation
The Creator is known by you, and the evidence all around you, and in you.
Perhaps the point you'll have the most trouble digesting but anyway. This is some next level arrogance.
Here, you may utilize the following, and be no longer doubting or in denial:
http://www.pearltrees.com/awhn/biblical-creation-history/id1593499[/QUOTE]
<-- Twice you've made me spit my coffee out. So I entertained the link and watched some of these videos. They're literally presenting the same old fallacious points that have been refuted thousands of times here, you may utilise the following, and no longer be fooled by weak arguments
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Point_refuted_a_thousand_times
Also, I just watched one by Mark Armitage regarding soft tissue in dinosaur...Man the guy literally say's 'I am trying to prove how this can work' <- he doesn't have any evidence, and he is doing the exact opposite of what scientists actually do which is try to falsify a hypothesis. Essentially what he has is an assumption and is now looking for things to fit that assumption - which is not how you do science... also read this article for a bit of perspective https://www.nature.com/news/university-sued-after-firing-creationist-fossil-hunter-1.16281
1
