@abcdef I'm just curious if you actually can confirm, with links to articles, or any credible sources, anything you're saying here, or not?
Please provide your proof. (ei links to articles, or anything credible) You might as well be saying bread comes from Mars if you don't have any verifiable evidence.
Please provide your proof.
Please provide proof. Where did you get this information? Rachel Madow, MSNBC?
I'm not sure you've heard about the most recent events. Trump said he'd drain the swamp, and then the media threw mud about Russian collusion. You have to be skeptical in this situation, don't you think? BEFORE you accuse a real person with colluding with the Russians don't you think you should get the most recent info?
Congress had the Russian collusion investigated thoroughly with both the Special Counsel John Durham and the Robert Mueller probe. Please read these articles:
"
John Durham called by Jim Jordan to testify on his scathing report NEXT WEEK as Republicans clamor for accountability, FBI defends 'missteps' that could have been prevented"
And:
"Rachel Maddow Show loses 19 percent of its audience the day after the Robert Mueller probe appears to clear Trump of Russian collusion"
and/or:
Durham special counsel investigation - Wikipedia ;
Mueller special counsel investigation - Wikipedia
Excerts: "Durham writes in the report: 'Based on the evidence gathered in the multiple exhaustive and costly federal investigations of these matters, including the instant investigation, neither U.S. law enforcement nor the Intelligence Community appears to have possessed any actual evidence of collusion in their holdings at the commencement of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation.' "
"But quoting directly from Mueller's report, Barr said that the special counsel's investigation 'did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.'