I have just done a quick search on fell away, fallen away, fall away, abandoned as in abandoned their faith, turned away.
You missed this one and I find it interesting that the term
'fall away' was used by Jesus Christ of His 11 disciples at the time He was being arrested. The disciples deserted Jesus as was predicted and Peter obviously denied Jesus three times. They were said to
'fall away'. (see Matthew 21:31-35)
Obviously, this is not a loss of salvation.
*Matthew 26:31 - Then Jesus said to them, "You will all
fall away because of Me this night, for it is written, 'I WILL STRIKE DOWN THE SHEPHERD, AND THE SHEEP OF THE FLOCK SHALL BE SCATTERED.' 32 "But after I have been raised, I will go ahead of you to Galilee." 33 But Peter said to Him, "Even though all may
fall away because of You, I will never
fall away."
We also see in Proverbs 24:16 - For a
righteous man may fall seven times and rise again, But the wicked shall fall by calamity. hmm..
This doesn't fit that criteria:
For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame. (Heb 6:4-6 KJV)
I've heard three different interpretations for this passage - lost salvation, never saved, hypothetical view.
In regards to the never saved view, see:
http://www.preceptaustin.org/hebrews_64-5
http://www.preceptaustin.org/hebrews_66
The hypothetical interpretation holds that this passage is written about Christians, and that the phrases “partakers of the Holy Ghost,” “enlightened,” and “tasted of the heavenly gift” are all descriptions of true believers.
According to this interpretation, the key word in the passage is if (verse 6). The writer of Hebrews is setting up a hypothetical statement: “IF a Christian were to fall away . . .” The point being made is that it would be impossible (IF a Christian falls away) to renew salvation. That’s because Christ died once for sin (Hebrews 9:28), and if His sacrifice is insufficient, then there’s no hope at all.
The passage, therefore, presents an argument based on a false premise (that a true Christian can fall away) and follows it to its senseless conclusion (that Jesus would have to be sacrificed again and again). The absurdity of the conclusion points up the impossibility of the original assumption. This reasoning is called reductio ad absurdum, in which a premise is disproved by showing that it logically leads to an absurdity. -
https://www.gotquestions.org/Hebrews-6.html
*So your interpretation of believers actually losing their salvation is INCONCLUSIVE.
Of all that the Father has given to Jesus, how many did Jesus say He would cast out or lose? - John 6:37-39; 10:27-29.
How long will God preserve His saints? - Psalm 37:28.
How long will believers be sealed in Christ with the Holy Spirit? - Ephesians 1:13-14; 4:30.
Of all those who are justified, how many of them will be glorified? - Romans 8:28-30.
Neither does this, but they are both concerning:
For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths.
2 Timothy 4:3-4
Who said these people were "saved" and "lost their salvation?" I've witnessed this for myself, in which "nominal" Christians leave a church that teaches sound doctrine, only to follow after teachers who tell them what their itching ears want to hear.
Other verses that speak of the perils that beset us are:
Heb_6:6 If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.
Obviously you believe they must have been true Christians for it says they were enlightened, tasted the word of God, and had partook of the Holy Spirit. But all these words can still be true the unsaved individual who has come to a knowledge of the truth, seen the power of the Holy Spirit, and felt the convicting and drawing of the Holy Spirit in their life. Judas Iscariot was an extreme example of this! He knew all there was to know been in the company of Jesus for three years. He had experienced the Holy Spirit’s power having been among the twelve sent out, two by two, to cast out demons and heal the sick. Yet he was never truly saved! Jesus own testimony about him confirms that he was not a true sheep that would be kept safe to the end. (John 17:11-12, John 13:18) but was a devil! (John 6:70). None of the key words for truly saved individuals such as ‘saving faith’, ‘eternal life’, ‘born again’, ‘redeemed by his blood’, ’saved’, ’salvation’ are used in this passage. In ‘Hebrews verse by verse’, William Newell quotes R.A Torrey on this passage saying ‘there is a quickening short of regeneration’. In other words, this passage speaks of the work of the Holy Spirit within the lives of these people that occurs before and leading up to salvation. But these people do not receive salvation, and openly rejecting it, they go back to the mud even if for a while they looked like the real thing.
So according to the never saved view, greater evidence of the fact that these people were not saved is given in verse 9. Things change in this verse, for now He is speaking to those truly saved (calls them BELOVED). He says that even though he speaks like this concerning
THOSE types of people, He is convinced of better things concerning YOU. Things that accompany SALVATION. In other words, the people he was talking about in verses 4-8 didn’t have salvation (and their open rejection testifies to this as well). But he has confidence in the beloved because they are saved! And this will show in their life through their perseverance.
To be continued..