Recent content by wolfwint

Well this is your view 😀

If you call me a liar, it makes no sense to reply anything. In your eyes it seems anyway a lie.

Wow, you wrote in german 😀 I will give response later. I am in preparing for vacation in Sweden with Caravan for 3 Weeks.

I dont know your special doctrine thats right. The pentecostal and charismatic spectrum of doctrines is very wide. But unique is that speaking in tongues is taught as a visible sign that someone is baptisesd in the Holy Spirit. If I am wrong, then tell me. And this particular teachings are...

I hate nobody! But you cant convince me from your doctrine, thats it. A doctrine which is 125 years old and separate christianity.

Later, I will try. But I suppose I cant. We have a different understanding from the scripture. One point I want add. Paul is very clear in what he states about woman pastorship . But you find woman pastorship in almost all pentecostal churches. Womanleadership you find also in many...

Why? Because it fits not in your believe system?

Again, this was an answer to @wanswick. Dont lay words in my post which I not have said. Btw, I agree I dont need to speak in tongues for to be saved ! You should ask @Wansvic what he means about it.

This was an answer to post 94 from @ edify

My post was an answer to @Wansvic

Again, my post was an answer to @Wansvic

My post was an answer to @Wansvic

Your are welcome 😀

Yes, and all the frim you mentioned passages in Acts 2 10 and 19, and I would add Acts 8 too, you can simply understand as an sign for the jews. But not as an theologie which will be an expierince for all believers in all ages till today. If this would be the case, we would not discuss about...

What you QUOTE in Acts 2,1-4 was unique. This never had repeatet in the bible afterwards: I mean the cloven tongues which sat upon each of them. If you would be right, then this particular sign belongs to the gift of speaking in tongues.