Reactions received by UnitedWithChrist
-
mailmandan reacted
to UnitedWithChrist's post in the thread Are you a Trinitarian, and if so, can you defend the doctrine?.
Do you deny that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit have each always existed as distinct persons? or Do you deny that the Father, Son... -
mailmandan reacted to UnitedWithChrist's post in the thread Are you a Trinitarian, and if so, can you defend the doctrine?.
This is based on the assumption that being = person, with the claim that there can only be one person per being. This is reducing God...
-
mailmandan reacted
to UnitedWithChrist's post in the thread Are you a Trinitarian, and if so, can you defend the doctrine?.
Christianity teaches that the Son was eternally begotten. Sonship did not occur at a particular point in time, and the Son had no... -
mailmandan reacted to UnitedWithChrist's post in the thread Are you a Trinitarian, and if so, can you defend the doctrine?.
I notice that you are continuing to define God in terms of the natural creation. That's the fundamental issue. The natural creation...
-
It's what the Bible teaches. Anyone who can read knows it. No person on this website has successfully exegeted 1 Cor 1:26ff from a...
-
Deuteronomy reacted
to UnitedWithChrist's post in the thread Are you a Trinitarian, and if so, can you defend the doctrine?.
Amusing cartoon and it does point to a lot of the erroneous analogies folks come up with. -
Deuteronomy reacted
to UnitedWithChrist's post in the thread Are you a Trinitarian, and if so, can you defend the doctrine?.
This is based on the assumption that being = person, with the claim that there can only be one person per being. This is reducing God... -
Deuteronomy reacted to UnitedWithChrist's post in the thread Are you a Trinitarian, and if so, can you defend the doctrine?.
Do you deny that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit have each always existed as distinct persons? or Do you deny that the Father, Son...
-
Deuteronomy reacted to UnitedWithChrist's post in the thread Are you a Trinitarian, and if so, can you defend the doctrine?.
Christianity teaches that the Son was eternally begotten. Sonship did not occur at a particular point in time, and the Son had no...
-
Deuteronomy reacted to UnitedWithChrist's post in the thread Are you a Trinitarian, and if so, can you defend the doctrine?.
I notice that you are continuing to define God in terms of the natural creation. That's the fundamental issue. The natural creation...
-
Sackcloth-N-Ashes reacted to UnitedWithChrist's post in the thread Are you a Trinitarian, and if so, can you defend the doctrine?.
This is based on the assumption that being = person, with the claim that there can only be one person per being. This is reducing God... -
Sackcloth-N-Ashes reacted to UnitedWithChrist's post in the thread Are you a Trinitarian, and if so, can you defend the doctrine?.
Do you deny that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit have each always existed as distinct persons? or Do you deny that the Father, Son...
-
Sackcloth-N-Ashes reacted
to UnitedWithChrist's post in the thread Is the doctrine of limited atonement biblical?.
Reformed theology largely agrees, in terms of the "general call". However, there is an "effective call" that the elect receive, which... -
Sackcloth-N-Ashes reacted to UnitedWithChrist's post in the thread Is the doctrine of limited atonement biblical?.
So, the claim is that the unsaved are not under the bondage of Satan. Man, you'd have to be blind not to see that. Do you realize that...
-
Sackcloth-N-Ashes reacted to UnitedWithChrist's post in the thread Is the doctrine of limited atonement biblical?.
Do what you want. Jesus' sheep listens to his voice. Salvation is of the LORD. We are not co-saviors, and to think so is simply...
-
Sackcloth-N-Ashes reacted to UnitedWithChrist's post in the thread Is the doctrine of limited atonement biblical?.
Of course they can. The mind of the unsaved dwells in chaos. Man is in the image of God, and retains a knowledge of what holiness...
-
Sackcloth-N-Ashes reacted to UnitedWithChrist's post in the thread Is the doctrine of limited atonement biblical?.
It surprises me that you would admit that, because if you do, you know that the unsaved are under Satan's bondage.
-
Sackcloth-N-Ashes reacted to UnitedWithChrist's post in the thread Is the doctrine of limited atonement biblical?.
How can you relegate the verses I quoted to believers? It is not. All unbelievers are under the bondage of Satan. And besides that...
-
Sackcloth-N-Ashes reacted to UnitedWithChrist's post in the thread Is the doctrine of limited atonement biblical?.
LOL KJV Only guys are ridiculous. Many of them are Independent Fundamental Baptists. They are a joke. Largely, they don't believe...
-
Sackcloth-N-Ashes reacted to UnitedWithChrist's post in the thread Is the doctrine of limited atonement biblical?.
That fits your theology, so you are glad to declare it to be true. However, I think unbelievers are opposing themselves too....they are...
