Reactions received by posthuman
-
i see now that i had mis-edited my post. i had meant to remove "worship" and put focus, but left both. my apologies for that -
this doesn't say anything about being commanded to mankind to ceremonially observe as law. that is never found until Exodus 16, given... -
this doesn't say anything about being commanded to mankind to ceremonially observe as law. that is never found until Exodus 16, given... -
it is Salvation Himself which set us free from the Law. no "if" Romans 7 is clear, and it gives the ten commandments as an example of...
-
categorically false, but a weirdly common mistake. easily disproven by the same verse you suppose to prove your fallacy: Romans 5:13...
-
The Law does not create sin. that is a ridiculous position. it's frankly stupid. sin exists before Adam, but the Law doesn't exist...
-
it is Salvation Himself which set us free from the Law. no "if" Romans 7 is clear, and it gives the ten commandments as an example of...
-
Tcategorically false, but a weirdly common mistake. easily disproven by the same verse you suppose to prove your fallacy: Romans 5:13...
-
categorically false, but a weirdly common mistake. easily disproven by the same verse you suppose to prove your fallacy: Romans 5:13...
-
you argued that the ceremonial sabbath observation law wasn't "added because of transgression" per Galatians 3. i pointed out that the...
-
"You still lack one thing." (Luke 18:22) -
are you quite sure that not being able to find scripture that says something is an impediment to your formulation of doctrine? b/c i... -
are you quite sure that not being able to find scripture that says something is an impediment to your formulation of doctrine? b/c i... -
maybe you shouldn't insist Adam was commanded to ceremonially cease from work every 7 days then.
-
Numbers 28:1-2 is definitely scripture. No idea why you call Numbers 28 "not according to scripture"....?
-
Hmm with that in mind, maybe best for you not to insist part of the Law isn't part of the Law.
-
the 1,000 year reign ;)
-
Hmm with that in mind, maybe best for you not to insist part of the Law isn't part of the Law.
-
hmm good thought, could be. If that's the case it would be modular arithmetic, so, whatever is left over after he divides it would be...
-
wow super big stretch to claim that Christ is only referring to the decalogue in Matthew 5:17-19 super false super unsupported claim...
