Reactions received by OIC1965
-
I agree with your position, and with VCO, and with Eternally Grateful, and certain others as stated, (as far as I understand it from... -
Yes
-
Because if he didn’t, he would be lost.
-
There is a future tense of salvation (of the body) but there is also are present tense and a perfect tense aspects of salvation...
-
Galatians 3:10. If you do not keep the Law completely and perfectly, you are cursed apart from imputed righteousness. That went for...
-
@ Guojing. Justification has always been “ declared righteous by a righteousness not your own, through faith.
-
If they do not have the righteousness of Christ, what righteousness do they have?
-
What they did not have was the permanent indwelling of the Holy Spirit. They were justified. Justification is not just forgiveness of...
-
Amen Note. I did not mean to type imputed faith. That was a typo. Imputed righteousness through faith.
-
I’d like to hear his answer on this
-
It cannot be their own righteousness, because our righteousnesses are filthy rags, and even at our best we miss the Mark completely...
-
So on what basis were they justified?
-
But that has nothing to do with justification. If I agreed with you on this, I would still disagree with you on the basis of the OT...
-
Justification is the judicial act when God declares a guilty sinner righteous.
-
Ohhh! We DO agree on this!
-
It cannot be their own righteousness, because our righteousnesses are filthy rags, and even at our best we miss the Mark completely... -
But that has nothing to do with justification. If I agreed with you on this, I would still disagree with you on the basis of the OT...
-
It cannot be their own righteousness, because our righteousnesses are filthy rags, and even at our best we miss the Mark completely... -
If they do not have the righteousness of Christ, what righteousness do they have? -
Amen Note. I did not mean to type imputed faith. That was a typo. Imputed righteousness through faith.
