Recent content by LeeLoving

Matthew 26:28 (KJV) For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins. Hebrews 9:22 (KJV) And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission. Is the correct understanding from these verses that Jesus...

Just wondering if anyone has a good view on this? This is something I struggle with, reconciling the different resurrection accounts. Matthew 28 and John 20 for instance present two different accounts which are seemingly contradictory. I have trouble harmonizing them or reconciling them, though...

Hi Naveen. I've struggled with this. To the best of my knowledge though you cannot commit this sin today as it was only possible for those who were present when the Holy Spirit was at work on the earth through Jesus. I think the sin may be blaspheming against him while he was at work through...

Is this synonymous with saying Jesus was punished for our sins? Or does chastisement connotate another meaning other than punishment?

Do you think the Gospel According to John lays it out succinctly? I find my sister says that you need to "receive Jesus" and maybe other things, other people saying similar things possibly (I think these sayings might be popular in the "church"), while in the Gospel According to John it's...

Well the scripture says that people will be like the angels in heaven, so I think the natural conclusion is that there is no marriage, since they are presumably unmarried. I don't really get it myself.

I think it just means that they won't marry, like the angels in heaven don't marry.

Or must you believe on his name? I read the KJV and have trouble with this. At the end of the Gospel According to John it says that the signs written about are there so that you might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you might have life through his name. The...

Also did you mean that in the first resurrection we will neither marry nor be given in marriage (not be neither male nor female), if I got that right? (looked at Matthew 22:30 KJV on BibleGateway, but it might have an error in it or something since I'm not taking it directly from the Bible)

I'm actually not sure if they all joined the Devil afterward. I just know the Devil apparently has angels. I assume they would be these ones that left their first estate, assuming these are the ones that indeed married the daughters of men in Genesis.

I don't think there are female angels. There are angels that are still in heaven and I believe angels that left their first estate and married the daughters of men, these angels are those that joined the Devil afterwards I believe (though I'm not entirely sure about this) (Revelation 12 KJV -...

Why do you think this if you don't mind me asking?

My guess is that there is not marriage in heaven, since there is no marriage in the first resurrection. It would be a little strange to be married in heaven and then not married when the resurrection happens, or inconvenient, I suppose. Maybe there is though?

Is "strange flesh" as expressed in Jude 1 (KJV) a reference to homosexual behaviour?

Do you know if these baptisms were under the authority of Jesus?