Reactions received by GWH
-
I wanna see you vote first. My suggestion is to change the Arminian/Calvinist option to biblical MFW or blasphemous TULIP. I vote for MFW. -
I agree. My understanding is that "some to be pastors and teachers" in Eph. 4:11 should be translated "pastor-teachers" or "pastors =... -
Ppioneermission reacted
to GWH's post in the thread The Error is Baptism in Jesus name only for salvation.
No, the error is failure to view the outward work of WB as indicative of the essential SB that occurs at the moment of saving faith... -
Amen, that is why I converted from believing the OSAS or P part of TULIP that as a Baptist I had been taught. The critical "level" of FW... -
Matt. 10:8 and 1Cor. 4:7 are why I offer my website as a free resource for all; <truthseekersfellowship.com>
-
Pilgrimshope reacted
to GWH's post in the thread At what point in our salvation is the blood of Christ applied?.
Yes, of course, and even reputable paraphrases are sufficient for salvation. For those of us who are not translators, knowing the... -
Now we might return to the analysis of the concluding part of the OP in the UGE thread: 6a. “Romans chapter 9 is the most famous... -
Amen, that is why I converted from believing the OSAS or P part of TULIP that as a Baptist I had been taught. The critical "level" of FW... -
Pilgrimshope reacted to GWH's post in the thread At what point in our salvation is the blood of Christ applied?.
I am right there with you, because that was my experience too--and my appreciation for the expertise of translators. I cited RBT by way...
-
Pilgrimshope reacted to GWH's post in the thread At what point in our salvation is the blood of Christ applied?.
<truthseekersfellowship.com>
