Reactions received by GWH
-
Yes, but let us call that flaw TULIPism so as not to disparage the good aspects of Calvinism. -
Unbelievers would not have tasted the heavenly gift, shared in the Holy Spirit, and tasted the goodness of the word of God and the... -
I don't. The Bible tells people struggling with faith to stand firm, persevere, hang in there (well, not in those words :^)...
-
OIt is impossible to imagine how this miracle will occur, because instead of every believer being in Jerusalem at the time of Christ's...
-
Yes, I remember being one of those watchers. My how CNN has fallen from those days! What now--Truth Social? -
Okay, I can see/pick out Jesus in v.7&11. Thanks. -
Yes, and have never been in danger other than a couple of encounters with bullies at school.
-
Amen! The Old Testament (OT) indicates that God chose the Jewish culture for the purpose of providing Messiah, through whom the world... -
BShort answer: Moral. Long answer: A problematic issue is reconciling God’s power and love with the fact of evil and its consequence...
-
Yes, and because sinful humanity retains the image of God or moral free will, every normal adult soul is able by faith to choose between...
-
TThereRoseaLamb reacted
to GWH's post in the thread Will The Actual Calvinists Here Please Stand Up?.
Which would include follower of Christ = Christian. (See Gideon's post #48.) -
TThereRoseaLamb reacted to GWH's post in the thread Will The Actual Calvinists Here Please Stand Up?.
Saints = believers = Christians in my Bible.
-
Saints = believers = Christians in my Bible. -
TThereRoseaLamb reacted
to GWH's post in the thread Will The Actual Calvinists Here Please Stand Up?.
I read the Institutes many years ago, and as well as I can remember the problematic part is TULIP, so the issue on CC is between that... -
P55? You must have good genes. Mine, if inherited, give me hope of about 15 more years, although each year it gets harder to keep up...
-
BCertainly there is slack. Surely you don't claim infallibility?! You'll not read RM 14:1-15:7, 1CR 8 & 10:23-33 regarding how to view...
-
BYes, everyone sought salvation via works/law/water baptism when Jesus lived, and he had a heck of a time getting them to realize those...
-
Is it possible to be a partial Calvinist, who affirms the parts in agreement with the kerygma, but not the problematic TULIP part... -
PWell, just in case, maybe we ought to speed up our study of Ephesians. (Do you want to introduce 1:15-16 ? :^)
-
Yes, the TULIPists do not think very logically in their implicit denial of divine omnilove.
