Reactions received by Dirtman
-
BBluesproverb reacted
to Dirtman's post in the thread Next Big Debate, Obergefell v. Hodges, Gay Marriage.
She has no grasp of the two kingdom principle. Maybe she should read Luther along with Locke. -
BBluesproverb reacted to Dirtman's post in the thread Next Big Debate, Obergefell v. Hodges, Gay Marriage.
Maybe also Philip Melanchthon, and possible Bonhoeffer as well.
-
BBluesproverb reacted to Dirtman's post in the thread Next Big Debate, Obergefell v. Hodges, Gay Marriage.
The whole issue and debate over govco cosigning fetish unions and life styles is absurd. The founders of western culture would have...
-
I dont know when marriage became the estate of the state. It was always the estate of God, delegated to the family. The state usurping... -
JaumeJ reacted to Dirtman's post in the thread The trinity ,can you be saved and not believe in it?.
I think its hard to believe in God if you dont believe in him. Thats a kind of weird idea. I think you can believe in God and not know... -
So we arent to call out evil? Nonsense. I think you should do a study concerning what that passage actually means Ironically you...
-
Y'all gonna butcher the doctrine of the Trinity now? -
FFreeGrace2 reacted to Dirtman's post in the thread Research: Majority of Americans Believe Works Are the Key to Salvation.
The papists and the arminians have really fouled grace alone.
-
Lucy-Pevensie reacted to Dirtman's post in the thread The trinity ,can you be saved and not believe in it?.
I think its hard to believe in God if you dont believe in him. Thats a kind of weird idea. I think you can believe in God and not know... -
This is a non sequitor. Civil rights are enumerated in the constitution. Slavery was a violation pf that document and it took a war to...
-
Roughsoul1991 reacted to Dirtman's post in the thread Next Big Debate, Obergefell v. Hodges, Gay Marriage.
This is a non sequitor. Civil rights are enumerated in the constitution. Slavery was a violation pf that document and it took a war to... -
Roughsoul1991 reacted to Dirtman's post in the thread Next Big Debate, Obergefell v. Hodges, Gay Marriage.
Already done. Sure slavery was before the constitution. However once the constitution was ratified slavery was a stark violation of the...
-
HealthAndHappiness reacted to Dirtman's post in the thread Next Big Debate, Obergefell v. Hodges, Gay Marriage.
Bingo, you win the gold medal. It good to meet someone capable of abstract thought. Who can look behind the proverbial curtain and see... -
That's her choice, she is free to make it. Jeans arent sexually provocative necessarily; I guess they could be, but not normally...
-
What does jeans have to do with modesty? Does anyone ever read that passage in the bible about dressing modest. That passage is more...
-
HealthAndHappiness reacted to Dirtman's post in the thread Next Big Debate, Obergefell v. Hodges, Gay Marriage.
Vac injury really makes me angry because its swept under the rug and ignored. Not only the companies but also the politicians should be...
-
JIt really does male me wonder how folks can trust any teaching here. If simple statements here lead to so much inference and conjecture...
-
Cool I dont have a goal of offending folks. I just wanted to add some levity. These debates become heated and angry fast. Some humor... -
Cabrillo reacted to Dirtman's post in the thread Next Big Debate, Obergefell v. Hodges, Gay Marriage.
While those are horrible destructive sins as well they arent the subject of the thread.. I do advocate that adultery should carry some... -
BHow much?