Reactions given by BibleloverBill
-
BibleloverBill reacted
to CS1's post in the thread "Hyper Grace " and preachers of the doctrine on CC.
Good morning , it has been a long - suffering and very patient with many in here pertaining to the topic of "hyper-grace" and those who... -
Show me where the Bible says God did this to mock the Jews. If you cannot, you should not say that He was mocking them lest you bear...
-
Look in the book of Acts. In chapter 8, the Samaritans believed and were baptized. In Acts 19, about 12 men who had previously been...
-
Paul said quench not the Spirit. Despise not prophesyings. Prove all things, Hold fast to that which is good. He did not limit...
-
that is a false narrative there is no doctrine of a second Baptism but One of water and of the Holy Spirit which The Lord Jesus is the...
-
Your logic is flawed and your comprehension is darkened on this matter. Even the verses you quote further down say clearly that the one...
-
I do not believe in the concept of "replacement theology" other than replacing the theology that comes from the word of God in exchange...
-
You are wrong it is not a teaching of Pentecostals and charismatics but from the word of God as recorded in the book of Acts and many...
-
Thanks. Still not sure I'm getting your meaning clearly... oh well. :) I do believe that God still speaks to individuals... by whatever...
-
I have heard many prophecies that sounded like quoted or paraphrased scriptures together, and I certainly believe the Spirit can give...
-
I think your questions are very good ones but, please know some of the questions you asked has nothing to do with the benefit of others...
-
It is sad that some here result to mocking the gifts of the Holy Spirit and gets many laughs from Christians who cannot use the word of...
-
Garee, I'm tired of your circular reasoning and repeated errors. I'm not going to continue this discussion when I see no movement on...
-
Yes, we have alot who do that too. Some legitimate. Some not so much.
-
You can offer it all you like, but it's still wrong. If you ignore context, you are likely to end up with incorrect and indefensible...